Cargando…
Co-creation of activities to promote health and well-being of older people – a scoping review
BACKGROUND: The global population is ageing and the need to promote health and well-being of this generation is essential. Co-creative practices can be solutions to welfare challenges in the health care sector and local policies. However, literature addressing co-creation of activities to promote he...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9593707/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac129.279 |
_version_ | 1784815228733620224 |
---|---|
author | Terkelsen, AS Wester, CT Gulis, G Jespersen, J Andersen, PT |
author_facet | Terkelsen, AS Wester, CT Gulis, G Jespersen, J Andersen, PT |
author_sort | Terkelsen, AS |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The global population is ageing and the need to promote health and well-being of this generation is essential. Co-creative practices can be solutions to welfare challenges in the health care sector and local policies. However, literature addressing co-creation of activities to promote health and well-being is sparse. The review aimed to identify health promotive activities co-created between the public and older people, the influence of co-creative activities on health and well-being of older people, and facilitators and barriers for doing co-creation. METHODS: We searched for peer-reviewed and grey literature in eight scientific and five non-scientific databases. Two reviewers independently screened publications for eligibility according to inclusion and exclusion criteria and extracted data. An inductive thematic content analysis was applied for the analysis. RESULTS: We included nineteen publications. Four themes related to co-creative activities emerged: “Social activities”, “Activities to create age-friendly environments”, “Discussions of healthy ageing”, and “Physical activities”. The co-creative activities influenced the overall well-being, and promoted active and healthy ageing, physical functioning, and quality of life. Identified facilitators for co-creation were the role of the facilitator, a supportive environment, recognition of competencies, while the main barriers were time and resources, and recruitment of participants. CONCLUSIONS: Few studies have investigated co-creation of activities to promote health and well-being of older people. The included studies dealt with activities in any form and not merely social and physical activities co-created. Future co-creation of activities with older people should consider the role of facilitators, the environment in which the co-creation takes place and value time, resources, and competencies of participants. KEY MESSAGES: • Studies on co-creation of activities to promote health and well-being of older people is sparse and must be explored further. • Future research may focus on co-creation of social and physical activities to promote health and well-being of older people and consider known facilitators for co-creation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9593707 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95937072022-11-22 Co-creation of activities to promote health and well-being of older people – a scoping review Terkelsen, AS Wester, CT Gulis, G Jespersen, J Andersen, PT Eur J Public Health Parallel Programme BACKGROUND: The global population is ageing and the need to promote health and well-being of this generation is essential. Co-creative practices can be solutions to welfare challenges in the health care sector and local policies. However, literature addressing co-creation of activities to promote health and well-being is sparse. The review aimed to identify health promotive activities co-created between the public and older people, the influence of co-creative activities on health and well-being of older people, and facilitators and barriers for doing co-creation. METHODS: We searched for peer-reviewed and grey literature in eight scientific and five non-scientific databases. Two reviewers independently screened publications for eligibility according to inclusion and exclusion criteria and extracted data. An inductive thematic content analysis was applied for the analysis. RESULTS: We included nineteen publications. Four themes related to co-creative activities emerged: “Social activities”, “Activities to create age-friendly environments”, “Discussions of healthy ageing”, and “Physical activities”. The co-creative activities influenced the overall well-being, and promoted active and healthy ageing, physical functioning, and quality of life. Identified facilitators for co-creation were the role of the facilitator, a supportive environment, recognition of competencies, while the main barriers were time and resources, and recruitment of participants. CONCLUSIONS: Few studies have investigated co-creation of activities to promote health and well-being of older people. The included studies dealt with activities in any form and not merely social and physical activities co-created. Future co-creation of activities with older people should consider the role of facilitators, the environment in which the co-creation takes place and value time, resources, and competencies of participants. KEY MESSAGES: • Studies on co-creation of activities to promote health and well-being of older people is sparse and must be explored further. • Future research may focus on co-creation of social and physical activities to promote health and well-being of older people and consider known facilitators for co-creation. Oxford University Press 2022-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9593707/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac129.279 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Parallel Programme Terkelsen, AS Wester, CT Gulis, G Jespersen, J Andersen, PT Co-creation of activities to promote health and well-being of older people – a scoping review |
title | Co-creation of activities to promote health and well-being of older people – a scoping review |
title_full | Co-creation of activities to promote health and well-being of older people – a scoping review |
title_fullStr | Co-creation of activities to promote health and well-being of older people – a scoping review |
title_full_unstemmed | Co-creation of activities to promote health and well-being of older people – a scoping review |
title_short | Co-creation of activities to promote health and well-being of older people – a scoping review |
title_sort | co-creation of activities to promote health and well-being of older people – a scoping review |
topic | Parallel Programme |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9593707/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac129.279 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT terkelsenas cocreationofactivitiestopromotehealthandwellbeingofolderpeopleascopingreview AT westerct cocreationofactivitiestopromotehealthandwellbeingofolderpeopleascopingreview AT gulisg cocreationofactivitiestopromotehealthandwellbeingofolderpeopleascopingreview AT jespersenj cocreationofactivitiestopromotehealthandwellbeingofolderpeopleascopingreview AT andersenpt cocreationofactivitiestopromotehealthandwellbeingofolderpeopleascopingreview |