Cargando…

Co-creation of activities to promote health and well-being of older people – a scoping review

BACKGROUND: The global population is ageing and the need to promote health and well-being of this generation is essential. Co-creative practices can be solutions to welfare challenges in the health care sector and local policies. However, literature addressing co-creation of activities to promote he...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Terkelsen, AS, Wester, CT, Gulis, G, Jespersen, J, Andersen, PT
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9593707/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac129.279
_version_ 1784815228733620224
author Terkelsen, AS
Wester, CT
Gulis, G
Jespersen, J
Andersen, PT
author_facet Terkelsen, AS
Wester, CT
Gulis, G
Jespersen, J
Andersen, PT
author_sort Terkelsen, AS
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The global population is ageing and the need to promote health and well-being of this generation is essential. Co-creative practices can be solutions to welfare challenges in the health care sector and local policies. However, literature addressing co-creation of activities to promote health and well-being is sparse. The review aimed to identify health promotive activities co-created between the public and older people, the influence of co-creative activities on health and well-being of older people, and facilitators and barriers for doing co-creation. METHODS: We searched for peer-reviewed and grey literature in eight scientific and five non-scientific databases. Two reviewers independently screened publications for eligibility according to inclusion and exclusion criteria and extracted data. An inductive thematic content analysis was applied for the analysis. RESULTS: We included nineteen publications. Four themes related to co-creative activities emerged: “Social activities”, “Activities to create age-friendly environments”, “Discussions of healthy ageing”, and “Physical activities”. The co-creative activities influenced the overall well-being, and promoted active and healthy ageing, physical functioning, and quality of life. Identified facilitators for co-creation were the role of the facilitator, a supportive environment, recognition of competencies, while the main barriers were time and resources, and recruitment of participants. CONCLUSIONS: Few studies have investigated co-creation of activities to promote health and well-being of older people. The included studies dealt with activities in any form and not merely social and physical activities co-created. Future co-creation of activities with older people should consider the role of facilitators, the environment in which the co-creation takes place and value time, resources, and competencies of participants. KEY MESSAGES: • Studies on co-creation of activities to promote health and well-being of older people is sparse and must be explored further. • Future research may focus on co-creation of social and physical activities to promote health and well-being of older people and consider known facilitators for co-creation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9593707
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95937072022-11-22 Co-creation of activities to promote health and well-being of older people – a scoping review Terkelsen, AS Wester, CT Gulis, G Jespersen, J Andersen, PT Eur J Public Health Parallel Programme BACKGROUND: The global population is ageing and the need to promote health and well-being of this generation is essential. Co-creative practices can be solutions to welfare challenges in the health care sector and local policies. However, literature addressing co-creation of activities to promote health and well-being is sparse. The review aimed to identify health promotive activities co-created between the public and older people, the influence of co-creative activities on health and well-being of older people, and facilitators and barriers for doing co-creation. METHODS: We searched for peer-reviewed and grey literature in eight scientific and five non-scientific databases. Two reviewers independently screened publications for eligibility according to inclusion and exclusion criteria and extracted data. An inductive thematic content analysis was applied for the analysis. RESULTS: We included nineteen publications. Four themes related to co-creative activities emerged: “Social activities”, “Activities to create age-friendly environments”, “Discussions of healthy ageing”, and “Physical activities”. The co-creative activities influenced the overall well-being, and promoted active and healthy ageing, physical functioning, and quality of life. Identified facilitators for co-creation were the role of the facilitator, a supportive environment, recognition of competencies, while the main barriers were time and resources, and recruitment of participants. CONCLUSIONS: Few studies have investigated co-creation of activities to promote health and well-being of older people. The included studies dealt with activities in any form and not merely social and physical activities co-created. Future co-creation of activities with older people should consider the role of facilitators, the environment in which the co-creation takes place and value time, resources, and competencies of participants. KEY MESSAGES: • Studies on co-creation of activities to promote health and well-being of older people is sparse and must be explored further. • Future research may focus on co-creation of social and physical activities to promote health and well-being of older people and consider known facilitators for co-creation. Oxford University Press 2022-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9593707/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac129.279 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Parallel Programme
Terkelsen, AS
Wester, CT
Gulis, G
Jespersen, J
Andersen, PT
Co-creation of activities to promote health and well-being of older people – a scoping review
title Co-creation of activities to promote health and well-being of older people – a scoping review
title_full Co-creation of activities to promote health and well-being of older people – a scoping review
title_fullStr Co-creation of activities to promote health and well-being of older people – a scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Co-creation of activities to promote health and well-being of older people – a scoping review
title_short Co-creation of activities to promote health and well-being of older people – a scoping review
title_sort co-creation of activities to promote health and well-being of older people – a scoping review
topic Parallel Programme
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9593707/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac129.279
work_keys_str_mv AT terkelsenas cocreationofactivitiestopromotehealthandwellbeingofolderpeopleascopingreview
AT westerct cocreationofactivitiestopromotehealthandwellbeingofolderpeopleascopingreview
AT gulisg cocreationofactivitiestopromotehealthandwellbeingofolderpeopleascopingreview
AT jespersenj cocreationofactivitiestopromotehealthandwellbeingofolderpeopleascopingreview
AT andersenpt cocreationofactivitiestopromotehealthandwellbeingofolderpeopleascopingreview