Cargando…
Promoting implementation of “Good and Best Practices” through Health Promotion and Prevention Registries
Health promotion and disease prevention programme registries can play an important role in increasing transparency of “good/ best Practices” and promoting their implementation. In the EU, there are different approaches to how registries seek to support the implementation of practices. However, there...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9593913/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac129.444 |
_version_ | 1784815281194926080 |
---|---|
author | Rossmann, C van Dale, D Rados-Krnel, S Kylanen, M Lewtak, K Grasso, M Tortone, C Ragazzoni, P Costa, L Maassen, A |
author_facet | Rossmann, C van Dale, D Rados-Krnel, S Kylanen, M Lewtak, K Grasso, M Tortone, C Ragazzoni, P Costa, L Maassen, A |
author_sort | Rossmann, C |
collection | PubMed |
description | Health promotion and disease prevention programme registries can play an important role in increasing transparency of “good/ best Practices” and promoting their implementation. In the EU, there are different approaches to how registries seek to support the implementation of practices. However, there is limited knowledge of the extent to which there are informative differences or overlaps in the mechanisms chosen for accreditation, capacity building and implementation. This presentation focuses on six national registries in the EU (Finland, Germany, Italy, Netherlands, Poland, Slovenia) and the European Public Health Best Practice Portal. Information was obtained through a working group on Good/ Best Practice Portals, established in 2019. Information on the process of adding good/best practices to the registry and on measures that promote implementation was gathered and evaluated through a descriptive case comparison. The comparison suggests that implementation can be promoted through different approaches for capacity building measures and incentives for implementation. The latter included funding resources, titling/awarding of practice and professional feedback in only a few registries. Registries may be useful not only for transparency of good and best Practices but also for implementation through capacity building and several incentives. The information provided in this presentation may be informative in guiding development of similar resources elsewhere and a starting point for discussion on how to support best the implementation of good/ best practices. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9593913 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95939132022-11-22 Promoting implementation of “Good and Best Practices” through Health Promotion and Prevention Registries Rossmann, C van Dale, D Rados-Krnel, S Kylanen, M Lewtak, K Grasso, M Tortone, C Ragazzoni, P Costa, L Maassen, A Eur J Public Health Parallel Programme Health promotion and disease prevention programme registries can play an important role in increasing transparency of “good/ best Practices” and promoting their implementation. In the EU, there are different approaches to how registries seek to support the implementation of practices. However, there is limited knowledge of the extent to which there are informative differences or overlaps in the mechanisms chosen for accreditation, capacity building and implementation. This presentation focuses on six national registries in the EU (Finland, Germany, Italy, Netherlands, Poland, Slovenia) and the European Public Health Best Practice Portal. Information was obtained through a working group on Good/ Best Practice Portals, established in 2019. Information on the process of adding good/best practices to the registry and on measures that promote implementation was gathered and evaluated through a descriptive case comparison. The comparison suggests that implementation can be promoted through different approaches for capacity building measures and incentives for implementation. The latter included funding resources, titling/awarding of practice and professional feedback in only a few registries. Registries may be useful not only for transparency of good and best Practices but also for implementation through capacity building and several incentives. The information provided in this presentation may be informative in guiding development of similar resources elsewhere and a starting point for discussion on how to support best the implementation of good/ best practices. Oxford University Press 2022-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9593913/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac129.444 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Parallel Programme Rossmann, C van Dale, D Rados-Krnel, S Kylanen, M Lewtak, K Grasso, M Tortone, C Ragazzoni, P Costa, L Maassen, A Promoting implementation of “Good and Best Practices” through Health Promotion and Prevention Registries |
title | Promoting implementation of “Good and Best Practices” through Health Promotion and Prevention Registries |
title_full | Promoting implementation of “Good and Best Practices” through Health Promotion and Prevention Registries |
title_fullStr | Promoting implementation of “Good and Best Practices” through Health Promotion and Prevention Registries |
title_full_unstemmed | Promoting implementation of “Good and Best Practices” through Health Promotion and Prevention Registries |
title_short | Promoting implementation of “Good and Best Practices” through Health Promotion and Prevention Registries |
title_sort | promoting implementation of “good and best practices” through health promotion and prevention registries |
topic | Parallel Programme |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9593913/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac129.444 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rossmannc promotingimplementationofgoodandbestpracticesthroughhealthpromotionandpreventionregistries AT vandaled promotingimplementationofgoodandbestpracticesthroughhealthpromotionandpreventionregistries AT radoskrnels promotingimplementationofgoodandbestpracticesthroughhealthpromotionandpreventionregistries AT kylanenm promotingimplementationofgoodandbestpracticesthroughhealthpromotionandpreventionregistries AT lewtakk promotingimplementationofgoodandbestpracticesthroughhealthpromotionandpreventionregistries AT grassom promotingimplementationofgoodandbestpracticesthroughhealthpromotionandpreventionregistries AT tortonec promotingimplementationofgoodandbestpracticesthroughhealthpromotionandpreventionregistries AT ragazzonip promotingimplementationofgoodandbestpracticesthroughhealthpromotionandpreventionregistries AT costal promotingimplementationofgoodandbestpracticesthroughhealthpromotionandpreventionregistries AT maassena promotingimplementationofgoodandbestpracticesthroughhealthpromotionandpreventionregistries |