Cargando…

Elevated risk of depression and anxiety disorder by „high strain“ occupations: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: Poor working conditions might lead to mental illness. METHODS: We performed a systematic review with meta-analyses as an update of a review published in 2013. We registered the study protocol with PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42020170032) and searched for epidemiological studies in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Seidler, A, Freiberg, A, Drössler, S, Hussenoeder, FS, Conrad, I, Riedel-Heller, S, Starke, K Romero, Schubert, M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9594164/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac130.091
_version_ 1784815346095489024
author Seidler, A
Freiberg, A
Drössler, S
Hussenoeder, FS
Conrad, I
Riedel-Heller, S
Starke, K Romero
Schubert, M
author_facet Seidler, A
Freiberg, A
Drössler, S
Hussenoeder, FS
Conrad, I
Riedel-Heller, S
Starke, K Romero
Schubert, M
author_sort Seidler, A
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Poor working conditions might lead to mental illness. METHODS: We performed a systematic review with meta-analyses as an update of a review published in 2013. We registered the study protocol with PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42020170032) and searched for epidemiological studies in MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Embase. Two reviewers carried out independently all review steps including title-abstract screening, full-text screening, risk-of-bias assessment and data extraction. Discordances were solved by consensus. We determined the certainty of evidence using the GRADE-approach. RESULTS: Ten cohort studies with acceptable study quality examined the relationship between high job strain and the incidence of depression. In the “classic” demand-control-model, ‘high strain’ (combination of high demands and low control) is compared with ‘low strain’ (combination of low demands and high job control). For high strain, the risk of depression was elevated by 73%, the pooled effect estimate for the risk of depression was 1.73 (95% CI 1.32-2.27. In a dichotomous analysis (without dividing job strain into the four dimensions mentioned above), there was a doubled risk of depression with high job strain (pooled effect estimate=1.99, 95% CI 1.68-2.35). We found comparable risk estimates for men and women. The GRADE assessment revealed a high certainty of evidence of the association between job strain and depression. We also found a considerably increased risk of anxiety disorder among individuals prone to high job strain. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review finds a clear association between high job strain (high demands in combination with low control) and depression as well as anxiety disorders. Acknowledgment: This study was financially supported by SUVA (Schweizerische Unfallversicherungsanstalt). KEY MESSAGES: High job strain (high demands, low control) is clearly associated with depression and anxiety disorders. The GRADE assessment revealed a high certainty of evidence of the association between job strain and depression.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9594164
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95941642022-11-22 Elevated risk of depression and anxiety disorder by „high strain“ occupations: a systematic review Seidler, A Freiberg, A Drössler, S Hussenoeder, FS Conrad, I Riedel-Heller, S Starke, K Romero Schubert, M Eur J Public Health Poster Walks BACKGROUND: Poor working conditions might lead to mental illness. METHODS: We performed a systematic review with meta-analyses as an update of a review published in 2013. We registered the study protocol with PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42020170032) and searched for epidemiological studies in MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Embase. Two reviewers carried out independently all review steps including title-abstract screening, full-text screening, risk-of-bias assessment and data extraction. Discordances were solved by consensus. We determined the certainty of evidence using the GRADE-approach. RESULTS: Ten cohort studies with acceptable study quality examined the relationship between high job strain and the incidence of depression. In the “classic” demand-control-model, ‘high strain’ (combination of high demands and low control) is compared with ‘low strain’ (combination of low demands and high job control). For high strain, the risk of depression was elevated by 73%, the pooled effect estimate for the risk of depression was 1.73 (95% CI 1.32-2.27. In a dichotomous analysis (without dividing job strain into the four dimensions mentioned above), there was a doubled risk of depression with high job strain (pooled effect estimate=1.99, 95% CI 1.68-2.35). We found comparable risk estimates for men and women. The GRADE assessment revealed a high certainty of evidence of the association between job strain and depression. We also found a considerably increased risk of anxiety disorder among individuals prone to high job strain. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review finds a clear association between high job strain (high demands in combination with low control) and depression as well as anxiety disorders. Acknowledgment: This study was financially supported by SUVA (Schweizerische Unfallversicherungsanstalt). KEY MESSAGES: High job strain (high demands, low control) is clearly associated with depression and anxiety disorders. The GRADE assessment revealed a high certainty of evidence of the association between job strain and depression. Oxford University Press 2022-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9594164/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac130.091 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Poster Walks
Seidler, A
Freiberg, A
Drössler, S
Hussenoeder, FS
Conrad, I
Riedel-Heller, S
Starke, K Romero
Schubert, M
Elevated risk of depression and anxiety disorder by „high strain“ occupations: a systematic review
title Elevated risk of depression and anxiety disorder by „high strain“ occupations: a systematic review
title_full Elevated risk of depression and anxiety disorder by „high strain“ occupations: a systematic review
title_fullStr Elevated risk of depression and anxiety disorder by „high strain“ occupations: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Elevated risk of depression and anxiety disorder by „high strain“ occupations: a systematic review
title_short Elevated risk of depression and anxiety disorder by „high strain“ occupations: a systematic review
title_sort elevated risk of depression and anxiety disorder by „high strain“ occupations: a systematic review
topic Poster Walks
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9594164/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac130.091
work_keys_str_mv AT seidlera elevatedriskofdepressionandanxietydisorderbyhighstrainoccupationsasystematicreview
AT freiberga elevatedriskofdepressionandanxietydisorderbyhighstrainoccupationsasystematicreview
AT drosslers elevatedriskofdepressionandanxietydisorderbyhighstrainoccupationsasystematicreview
AT hussenoederfs elevatedriskofdepressionandanxietydisorderbyhighstrainoccupationsasystematicreview
AT conradi elevatedriskofdepressionandanxietydisorderbyhighstrainoccupationsasystematicreview
AT riedelhellers elevatedriskofdepressionandanxietydisorderbyhighstrainoccupationsasystematicreview
AT starkekromero elevatedriskofdepressionandanxietydisorderbyhighstrainoccupationsasystematicreview
AT schubertm elevatedriskofdepressionandanxietydisorderbyhighstrainoccupationsasystematicreview