Cargando…

Evaluation of the quality of cause of death statistics of the last decades in the European Union: Lluís Cirera

INTRODUCTION: The European Union (EU) do not publish the quality of cause-of-death statistics, when is possible to assess quality by reliability. Quality does not present consolidated indicators. Ill-defined and other inaccurate causes have presented different groupings. OBJECTIVE: To assess the qua...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cirera, L, Ballesta, M, Uroz, V, Sameron, D
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9594217/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac129.761
_version_ 1784815359780454400
author Cirera, L
Ballesta, M
Uroz, V
Sameron, D
author_facet Cirera, L
Ballesta, M
Uroz, V
Sameron, D
author_sort Cirera, L
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The European Union (EU) do not publish the quality of cause-of-death statistics, when is possible to assess quality by reliability. Quality does not present consolidated indicators. Ill-defined and other inaccurate causes have presented different groupings. OBJECTIVE: To assess the quality of official cause-of-death statistics of the European Union by member states from 2006 to 2020. METHODS: Cases and population were from the WHO repertory. We selected causes in EU27 countries by up to fourth code-character of ICD10 -on the EuroStat website were not available-. Case counts were grouped into ill- defined, unspecific, less specific (the latter two, in inaccurate), and judicial (inaccurate external causes) categories, based on literature and expertise. We calculated age-adjusted rates to the Standard European Population by country, sex, period (2006-, 2011- and 2016-2020), and quality category. We tested the Comparative Mortality Ratio (CMR) of each country to the European Union median by a Bayesian approach, at 5% statistical significance. We plotted the rates proportion of each quality category in its all causes. RESULTS: We included 25 countries. Some did not report all years. Six countries showed >19% for ill-defined causes and 3 member states had <5% in both sex and last period. In inaccurate, for the same time period and sex, average pointed 10% with a range of 3-19%. In the same period, CMR exceeded significantly the EU median in 19 and 18 countries for women and men, respectively; and exceeded in unspecific causes in 12 countries for women and men. DISCUSSION: Literature showed that incorrect causes of death were random distributed. Probably major causes were biased and underestimated. CONCLUSIONS: Quality of cause of death is a useful indicator of mortality statistics reliability. Quality indicators targeted national gaps across EU. We need a new EU task force on statistics of causes of death in accordance with the XXI century. KEY MESSAGES: • Quality indicators of causes of death statistics targeted national gaps across the European Union. • The statistics of death causes underestimated the main causes of death in the European Union.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9594217
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95942172022-11-22 Evaluation of the quality of cause of death statistics of the last decades in the European Union: Lluís Cirera Cirera, L Ballesta, M Uroz, V Sameron, D Eur J Public Health Parallel Programme INTRODUCTION: The European Union (EU) do not publish the quality of cause-of-death statistics, when is possible to assess quality by reliability. Quality does not present consolidated indicators. Ill-defined and other inaccurate causes have presented different groupings. OBJECTIVE: To assess the quality of official cause-of-death statistics of the European Union by member states from 2006 to 2020. METHODS: Cases and population were from the WHO repertory. We selected causes in EU27 countries by up to fourth code-character of ICD10 -on the EuroStat website were not available-. Case counts were grouped into ill- defined, unspecific, less specific (the latter two, in inaccurate), and judicial (inaccurate external causes) categories, based on literature and expertise. We calculated age-adjusted rates to the Standard European Population by country, sex, period (2006-, 2011- and 2016-2020), and quality category. We tested the Comparative Mortality Ratio (CMR) of each country to the European Union median by a Bayesian approach, at 5% statistical significance. We plotted the rates proportion of each quality category in its all causes. RESULTS: We included 25 countries. Some did not report all years. Six countries showed >19% for ill-defined causes and 3 member states had <5% in both sex and last period. In inaccurate, for the same time period and sex, average pointed 10% with a range of 3-19%. In the same period, CMR exceeded significantly the EU median in 19 and 18 countries for women and men, respectively; and exceeded in unspecific causes in 12 countries for women and men. DISCUSSION: Literature showed that incorrect causes of death were random distributed. Probably major causes were biased and underestimated. CONCLUSIONS: Quality of cause of death is a useful indicator of mortality statistics reliability. Quality indicators targeted national gaps across EU. We need a new EU task force on statistics of causes of death in accordance with the XXI century. KEY MESSAGES: • Quality indicators of causes of death statistics targeted national gaps across the European Union. • The statistics of death causes underestimated the main causes of death in the European Union. Oxford University Press 2022-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9594217/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac129.761 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Parallel Programme
Cirera, L
Ballesta, M
Uroz, V
Sameron, D
Evaluation of the quality of cause of death statistics of the last decades in the European Union: Lluís Cirera
title Evaluation of the quality of cause of death statistics of the last decades in the European Union: Lluís Cirera
title_full Evaluation of the quality of cause of death statistics of the last decades in the European Union: Lluís Cirera
title_fullStr Evaluation of the quality of cause of death statistics of the last decades in the European Union: Lluís Cirera
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the quality of cause of death statistics of the last decades in the European Union: Lluís Cirera
title_short Evaluation of the quality of cause of death statistics of the last decades in the European Union: Lluís Cirera
title_sort evaluation of the quality of cause of death statistics of the last decades in the european union: lluís cirera
topic Parallel Programme
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9594217/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac129.761
work_keys_str_mv AT cireral evaluationofthequalityofcauseofdeathstatisticsofthelastdecadesintheeuropeanunionlluiscirera
AT ballestam evaluationofthequalityofcauseofdeathstatisticsofthelastdecadesintheeuropeanunionlluiscirera
AT urozv evaluationofthequalityofcauseofdeathstatisticsofthelastdecadesintheeuropeanunionlluiscirera
AT samerond evaluationofthequalityofcauseofdeathstatisticsofthelastdecadesintheeuropeanunionlluiscirera