Cargando…

The development of the Physical Activity Environment Policy Index (PA-EPI): a tool for monitoring and benchmarking government policies and actions to improve physical activity: Catherine Woods

BACKGROUND: Insufficient physical activity (PA) is a global issue for health. A multifaceted response, including government action, is essential to improve population levels of PA. The purpose of this study was to develop the ‘Physical Activity Environment Policy Index’ (PA-EPI) monitoring framework...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Woods, C, Kelly, L, Volf, K, Gelius, P, Messing, S, Forberger, S, Lakerveld, J, den Braver, N, Zukowska, J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9594287/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac129.270
_version_ 1784815377164795904
author Woods, C
Kelly, L
Volf, K
Gelius, P
Messing, S
Forberger, S
Lakerveld, J
den Braver, N
Zukowska, J
author_facet Woods, C
Kelly, L
Volf, K
Gelius, P
Messing, S
Forberger, S
Lakerveld, J
den Braver, N
Zukowska, J
author_sort Woods, C
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Insufficient physical activity (PA) is a global issue for health. A multifaceted response, including government action, is essential to improve population levels of PA. The purpose of this study was to develop the ‘Physical Activity Environment Policy Index’ (PA-EPI) monitoring framework to assess government policies and actions for creating a healthy PA environment. METHODS: An iterative process was undertaken. This involved a review of policy documents from authoritative organisations, a policy audit of four European countries, and systematic reviews of scientific literature. This was followed by an online consultation with academic experts (N = 101; 20 countries, 72% response rate), and policymakers (N = 40, 4 EU countries). During this process, consensus workshops where quantitative and qualitative data alongside theoretical and pragmatic considerations were used to inform PA-EPI development. RESULTS: The PA-EPI is conceptualised as a two-component ‘policy’ and ‘infrastructure support’ framework. The two components comprise eight policy and seven infrastructure support domains. The policy domains are education, transport, urban design, healthcare, public education (including mass media), sport-for-all, workplaces and community. The infrastructure support domains are leadership, governance, monitoring and intelligence, funding and resources, platforms for interaction, workforce development, and health-in-all-policies. Forty-five ‘good practice statements’ (GPS) or indicators of ideal good practice within each domain concludes the PA-EPI. A potential eight-step process for conducting the PA-EPI is described. CONCLUSIONS: Once pre-tested and piloted in several countries of various sizes and income levels, the PA-EPI GPS will evolve into benchmarks established by governments at the forefront of creating and implementing policies to address inactivity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9594287
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95942872022-11-22 The development of the Physical Activity Environment Policy Index (PA-EPI): a tool for monitoring and benchmarking government policies and actions to improve physical activity: Catherine Woods Woods, C Kelly, L Volf, K Gelius, P Messing, S Forberger, S Lakerveld, J den Braver, N Zukowska, J Eur J Public Health Parallel Programme BACKGROUND: Insufficient physical activity (PA) is a global issue for health. A multifaceted response, including government action, is essential to improve population levels of PA. The purpose of this study was to develop the ‘Physical Activity Environment Policy Index’ (PA-EPI) monitoring framework to assess government policies and actions for creating a healthy PA environment. METHODS: An iterative process was undertaken. This involved a review of policy documents from authoritative organisations, a policy audit of four European countries, and systematic reviews of scientific literature. This was followed by an online consultation with academic experts (N = 101; 20 countries, 72% response rate), and policymakers (N = 40, 4 EU countries). During this process, consensus workshops where quantitative and qualitative data alongside theoretical and pragmatic considerations were used to inform PA-EPI development. RESULTS: The PA-EPI is conceptualised as a two-component ‘policy’ and ‘infrastructure support’ framework. The two components comprise eight policy and seven infrastructure support domains. The policy domains are education, transport, urban design, healthcare, public education (including mass media), sport-for-all, workplaces and community. The infrastructure support domains are leadership, governance, monitoring and intelligence, funding and resources, platforms for interaction, workforce development, and health-in-all-policies. Forty-five ‘good practice statements’ (GPS) or indicators of ideal good practice within each domain concludes the PA-EPI. A potential eight-step process for conducting the PA-EPI is described. CONCLUSIONS: Once pre-tested and piloted in several countries of various sizes and income levels, the PA-EPI GPS will evolve into benchmarks established by governments at the forefront of creating and implementing policies to address inactivity. Oxford University Press 2022-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9594287/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac129.270 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Parallel Programme
Woods, C
Kelly, L
Volf, K
Gelius, P
Messing, S
Forberger, S
Lakerveld, J
den Braver, N
Zukowska, J
The development of the Physical Activity Environment Policy Index (PA-EPI): a tool for monitoring and benchmarking government policies and actions to improve physical activity: Catherine Woods
title The development of the Physical Activity Environment Policy Index (PA-EPI): a tool for monitoring and benchmarking government policies and actions to improve physical activity: Catherine Woods
title_full The development of the Physical Activity Environment Policy Index (PA-EPI): a tool for monitoring and benchmarking government policies and actions to improve physical activity: Catherine Woods
title_fullStr The development of the Physical Activity Environment Policy Index (PA-EPI): a tool for monitoring and benchmarking government policies and actions to improve physical activity: Catherine Woods
title_full_unstemmed The development of the Physical Activity Environment Policy Index (PA-EPI): a tool for monitoring and benchmarking government policies and actions to improve physical activity: Catherine Woods
title_short The development of the Physical Activity Environment Policy Index (PA-EPI): a tool for monitoring and benchmarking government policies and actions to improve physical activity: Catherine Woods
title_sort development of the physical activity environment policy index (pa-epi): a tool for monitoring and benchmarking government policies and actions to improve physical activity: catherine woods
topic Parallel Programme
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9594287/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac129.270
work_keys_str_mv AT woodsc thedevelopmentofthephysicalactivityenvironmentpolicyindexpaepiatoolformonitoringandbenchmarkinggovernmentpoliciesandactionstoimprovephysicalactivitycatherinewoods
AT kellyl thedevelopmentofthephysicalactivityenvironmentpolicyindexpaepiatoolformonitoringandbenchmarkinggovernmentpoliciesandactionstoimprovephysicalactivitycatherinewoods
AT volfk thedevelopmentofthephysicalactivityenvironmentpolicyindexpaepiatoolformonitoringandbenchmarkinggovernmentpoliciesandactionstoimprovephysicalactivitycatherinewoods
AT geliusp thedevelopmentofthephysicalactivityenvironmentpolicyindexpaepiatoolformonitoringandbenchmarkinggovernmentpoliciesandactionstoimprovephysicalactivitycatherinewoods
AT messings thedevelopmentofthephysicalactivityenvironmentpolicyindexpaepiatoolformonitoringandbenchmarkinggovernmentpoliciesandactionstoimprovephysicalactivitycatherinewoods
AT forbergers thedevelopmentofthephysicalactivityenvironmentpolicyindexpaepiatoolformonitoringandbenchmarkinggovernmentpoliciesandactionstoimprovephysicalactivitycatherinewoods
AT lakerveldj thedevelopmentofthephysicalactivityenvironmentpolicyindexpaepiatoolformonitoringandbenchmarkinggovernmentpoliciesandactionstoimprovephysicalactivitycatherinewoods
AT denbravern thedevelopmentofthephysicalactivityenvironmentpolicyindexpaepiatoolformonitoringandbenchmarkinggovernmentpoliciesandactionstoimprovephysicalactivitycatherinewoods
AT zukowskaj thedevelopmentofthephysicalactivityenvironmentpolicyindexpaepiatoolformonitoringandbenchmarkinggovernmentpoliciesandactionstoimprovephysicalactivitycatherinewoods
AT thedevelopmentofthephysicalactivityenvironmentpolicyindexpaepiatoolformonitoringandbenchmarkinggovernmentpoliciesandactionstoimprovephysicalactivitycatherinewoods
AT woodsc developmentofthephysicalactivityenvironmentpolicyindexpaepiatoolformonitoringandbenchmarkinggovernmentpoliciesandactionstoimprovephysicalactivitycatherinewoods
AT kellyl developmentofthephysicalactivityenvironmentpolicyindexpaepiatoolformonitoringandbenchmarkinggovernmentpoliciesandactionstoimprovephysicalactivitycatherinewoods
AT volfk developmentofthephysicalactivityenvironmentpolicyindexpaepiatoolformonitoringandbenchmarkinggovernmentpoliciesandactionstoimprovephysicalactivitycatherinewoods
AT geliusp developmentofthephysicalactivityenvironmentpolicyindexpaepiatoolformonitoringandbenchmarkinggovernmentpoliciesandactionstoimprovephysicalactivitycatherinewoods
AT messings developmentofthephysicalactivityenvironmentpolicyindexpaepiatoolformonitoringandbenchmarkinggovernmentpoliciesandactionstoimprovephysicalactivitycatherinewoods
AT forbergers developmentofthephysicalactivityenvironmentpolicyindexpaepiatoolformonitoringandbenchmarkinggovernmentpoliciesandactionstoimprovephysicalactivitycatherinewoods
AT lakerveldj developmentofthephysicalactivityenvironmentpolicyindexpaepiatoolformonitoringandbenchmarkinggovernmentpoliciesandactionstoimprovephysicalactivitycatherinewoods
AT denbravern developmentofthephysicalactivityenvironmentpolicyindexpaepiatoolformonitoringandbenchmarkinggovernmentpoliciesandactionstoimprovephysicalactivitycatherinewoods
AT zukowskaj developmentofthephysicalactivityenvironmentpolicyindexpaepiatoolformonitoringandbenchmarkinggovernmentpoliciesandactionstoimprovephysicalactivitycatherinewoods
AT developmentofthephysicalactivityenvironmentpolicyindexpaepiatoolformonitoringandbenchmarkinggovernmentpoliciesandactionstoimprovephysicalactivitycatherinewoods