Cargando…

Evaluation of a universal early intervention for parents and children from birth to age five

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate the health and economic outcomes of a universal early intervention for parents and children, the Salut Programme, from birth to when the child completed five years of age. METHODS: This study adopted a retrospective observational design using routinely col...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sampaio, F, Häggström, J, Ssegonja, R, Eurenius, E, Ivarsson, A, Pulkki-Brännström, AM, Feldman, I
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9594394/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac131.247
_version_ 1784815405541359616
author Sampaio, F
Häggström, J
Ssegonja, R
Eurenius, E
Ivarsson, A
Pulkki-Brännström, AM
Feldman, I
author_facet Sampaio, F
Häggström, J
Ssegonja, R
Eurenius, E
Ivarsson, A
Pulkki-Brännström, AM
Feldman, I
author_sort Sampaio, F
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate the health and economic outcomes of a universal early intervention for parents and children, the Salut Programme, from birth to when the child completed five years of age. METHODS: This study adopted a retrospective observational design using routinely collected register data with respect to both exposures and outcomes from a county in northern Sweden. Areas that received care-as-usual (non-Salut area) were compared to areas where the Programme was implemented after 2006 (Salut area) in terms of: i) health outcomes, healthcare resource use and related costs around pregnancy, delivery and birth, and ii) healthcare resource use and related costs, as well as costs related to care of sick child. Costs were estimated for inpatient care and specialised outpatient care for mothers and children. Two analyses were conducted: a matched difference-in difference analysis using the total sample and an analysis including a longitudinal subsample. RESULTS: The longitudinal analysis on mothers who had given birth in both the pre- and post-measure periods showed that those that had been exposed to the Salut Programme, had on average 6% (95% CI 3-9%) more full-term pregnancies and 2% (95% CI 0.03-3%) more babies born within normal weight range, compared to mothers who had only care-as-usual. Savings were incurred in terms of outpatient care related costs for children of mothers in the Salut area ($826). The difference-in-difference analysis using the total sample did not result in any significant differences in health outcomes or cumulative resource use over time. CONCLUSIONS: The Salut Programme achieved health gains at a reasonable cost for children and parents, and may lead to lower usage of outpatient care. Other indicators point towards positive effects but the small sample size may have led to underestimation of true differences. The current findings support the continuous investment in this early childhood programme. KEY MESSAGES: • The Salut Programme improves the health of children and parents at a low cost. • The Salut Programme as a health promotion early intervention is value for money and should be included in the local policy investment agenda.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9594394
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95943942022-11-22 Evaluation of a universal early intervention for parents and children from birth to age five Sampaio, F Häggström, J Ssegonja, R Eurenius, E Ivarsson, A Pulkki-Brännström, AM Feldman, I Eur J Public Health Poster Displays BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate the health and economic outcomes of a universal early intervention for parents and children, the Salut Programme, from birth to when the child completed five years of age. METHODS: This study adopted a retrospective observational design using routinely collected register data with respect to both exposures and outcomes from a county in northern Sweden. Areas that received care-as-usual (non-Salut area) were compared to areas where the Programme was implemented after 2006 (Salut area) in terms of: i) health outcomes, healthcare resource use and related costs around pregnancy, delivery and birth, and ii) healthcare resource use and related costs, as well as costs related to care of sick child. Costs were estimated for inpatient care and specialised outpatient care for mothers and children. Two analyses were conducted: a matched difference-in difference analysis using the total sample and an analysis including a longitudinal subsample. RESULTS: The longitudinal analysis on mothers who had given birth in both the pre- and post-measure periods showed that those that had been exposed to the Salut Programme, had on average 6% (95% CI 3-9%) more full-term pregnancies and 2% (95% CI 0.03-3%) more babies born within normal weight range, compared to mothers who had only care-as-usual. Savings were incurred in terms of outpatient care related costs for children of mothers in the Salut area ($826). The difference-in-difference analysis using the total sample did not result in any significant differences in health outcomes or cumulative resource use over time. CONCLUSIONS: The Salut Programme achieved health gains at a reasonable cost for children and parents, and may lead to lower usage of outpatient care. Other indicators point towards positive effects but the small sample size may have led to underestimation of true differences. The current findings support the continuous investment in this early childhood programme. KEY MESSAGES: • The Salut Programme improves the health of children and parents at a low cost. • The Salut Programme as a health promotion early intervention is value for money and should be included in the local policy investment agenda. Oxford University Press 2022-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9594394/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac131.247 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Poster Displays
Sampaio, F
Häggström, J
Ssegonja, R
Eurenius, E
Ivarsson, A
Pulkki-Brännström, AM
Feldman, I
Evaluation of a universal early intervention for parents and children from birth to age five
title Evaluation of a universal early intervention for parents and children from birth to age five
title_full Evaluation of a universal early intervention for parents and children from birth to age five
title_fullStr Evaluation of a universal early intervention for parents and children from birth to age five
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of a universal early intervention for parents and children from birth to age five
title_short Evaluation of a universal early intervention for parents and children from birth to age five
title_sort evaluation of a universal early intervention for parents and children from birth to age five
topic Poster Displays
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9594394/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac131.247
work_keys_str_mv AT sampaiof evaluationofauniversalearlyinterventionforparentsandchildrenfrombirthtoagefive
AT haggstromj evaluationofauniversalearlyinterventionforparentsandchildrenfrombirthtoagefive
AT ssegonjar evaluationofauniversalearlyinterventionforparentsandchildrenfrombirthtoagefive
AT eureniuse evaluationofauniversalearlyinterventionforparentsandchildrenfrombirthtoagefive
AT ivarssona evaluationofauniversalearlyinterventionforparentsandchildrenfrombirthtoagefive
AT pulkkibrannstromam evaluationofauniversalearlyinterventionforparentsandchildrenfrombirthtoagefive
AT feldmani evaluationofauniversalearlyinterventionforparentsandchildrenfrombirthtoagefive