Cargando…

Constructing a socioeconomic status index for colorectal cancer screening evaluation

OBJECTIVE: To construct an individual socioeconomic status index (ISESI) with information available in the Population Information System of the Region of Valencia, Spain, and use it to analyse inequalities in a colorectal cancer screening programme (CRCSP). METHODS: Cross-sectional study. The study...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Molina-Barceló, A, Vanaclocha-Espí, M, Pinto-Carbó, M, Martín-Pozuelo, J, Romeo, P, Peiró-Pérez, R, Barona, C, Ortiz, F, Nolasco, A, Castán-Cameo, S
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9594405/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac131.108
_version_ 1784815408371466240
author Molina-Barceló, A
Vanaclocha-Espí, M
Pinto-Carbó, M
Martín-Pozuelo, J
Romeo, P
Peiró-Pérez, R
Barona, C
Ortiz, F
Nolasco, A
Castán-Cameo, S
author_facet Molina-Barceló, A
Vanaclocha-Espí, M
Pinto-Carbó, M
Martín-Pozuelo, J
Romeo, P
Peiró-Pérez, R
Barona, C
Ortiz, F
Nolasco, A
Castán-Cameo, S
author_sort Molina-Barceló, A
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To construct an individual socioeconomic status index (ISESI) with information available in the Population Information System of the Region of Valencia, Spain, and use it to analyse inequalities in a colorectal cancer screening programme (CRCSP). METHODS: Cross-sectional study. The study population was composed of men and women aged between 50 and 69 who were invited to participate in the most recently completed round of the Region of Valencia CRCSP in 2020, n = 1,150,684. A multiple correspondence analysis was performed to aggregate information in the Segmented, Integrated and Geographical Population Analysis Code from the Population Information System of the Region of Valencia into an ISESI. Data from the 2016 Region of Valencia Health Survey was used for validation. The relationship between CRCSP participation and the ISESI was analysed by logistic regression models. RESULTS: The variables included in the index were nationality, employment status, disability, healthcare coverage, risk of vulnerability and family size. The most important categories for determining the highest socioeconomic status were being employed and not being at risk of social vulnerability, and being unemployed and at risk of social vulnerability for determining the lowest socioeconomic status. Index validation demonstrated internal and external coherence for measuring socioeconomic status. The relationship between CRCSP participation and the ISESI categorised by quartile (Q) showed that Q4 (the lowest socioeconomic status) was less likely to participate OR = 0.769 (0.757-0.782) than Q1 (the highest socioeconomic status), and the opposite was found for Q2 OR = 1.368 (1.347-1.390) and Q3 OR = 1.156 (1.137-1.175). CONCLUSIONS: An ISESI was constructed and validated using Population Information System data and made it possible to evaluate inequalities in colorectal cancer screening. KEY MESSAGES: • An individual socioeconomic status index was constructed and validated using Regional Population Information System data. • The Individual socioeconomic status index constructed allows to systematically evaluates inequalities in colorectal cancer screening.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9594405
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95944052022-11-22 Constructing a socioeconomic status index for colorectal cancer screening evaluation Molina-Barceló, A Vanaclocha-Espí, M Pinto-Carbó, M Martín-Pozuelo, J Romeo, P Peiró-Pérez, R Barona, C Ortiz, F Nolasco, A Castán-Cameo, S Eur J Public Health Poster Displays OBJECTIVE: To construct an individual socioeconomic status index (ISESI) with information available in the Population Information System of the Region of Valencia, Spain, and use it to analyse inequalities in a colorectal cancer screening programme (CRCSP). METHODS: Cross-sectional study. The study population was composed of men and women aged between 50 and 69 who were invited to participate in the most recently completed round of the Region of Valencia CRCSP in 2020, n = 1,150,684. A multiple correspondence analysis was performed to aggregate information in the Segmented, Integrated and Geographical Population Analysis Code from the Population Information System of the Region of Valencia into an ISESI. Data from the 2016 Region of Valencia Health Survey was used for validation. The relationship between CRCSP participation and the ISESI was analysed by logistic regression models. RESULTS: The variables included in the index were nationality, employment status, disability, healthcare coverage, risk of vulnerability and family size. The most important categories for determining the highest socioeconomic status were being employed and not being at risk of social vulnerability, and being unemployed and at risk of social vulnerability for determining the lowest socioeconomic status. Index validation demonstrated internal and external coherence for measuring socioeconomic status. The relationship between CRCSP participation and the ISESI categorised by quartile (Q) showed that Q4 (the lowest socioeconomic status) was less likely to participate OR = 0.769 (0.757-0.782) than Q1 (the highest socioeconomic status), and the opposite was found for Q2 OR = 1.368 (1.347-1.390) and Q3 OR = 1.156 (1.137-1.175). CONCLUSIONS: An ISESI was constructed and validated using Population Information System data and made it possible to evaluate inequalities in colorectal cancer screening. KEY MESSAGES: • An individual socioeconomic status index was constructed and validated using Regional Population Information System data. • The Individual socioeconomic status index constructed allows to systematically evaluates inequalities in colorectal cancer screening. Oxford University Press 2022-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9594405/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac131.108 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Poster Displays
Molina-Barceló, A
Vanaclocha-Espí, M
Pinto-Carbó, M
Martín-Pozuelo, J
Romeo, P
Peiró-Pérez, R
Barona, C
Ortiz, F
Nolasco, A
Castán-Cameo, S
Constructing a socioeconomic status index for colorectal cancer screening evaluation
title Constructing a socioeconomic status index for colorectal cancer screening evaluation
title_full Constructing a socioeconomic status index for colorectal cancer screening evaluation
title_fullStr Constructing a socioeconomic status index for colorectal cancer screening evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Constructing a socioeconomic status index for colorectal cancer screening evaluation
title_short Constructing a socioeconomic status index for colorectal cancer screening evaluation
title_sort constructing a socioeconomic status index for colorectal cancer screening evaluation
topic Poster Displays
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9594405/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac131.108
work_keys_str_mv AT molinabarceloa constructingasocioeconomicstatusindexforcolorectalcancerscreeningevaluation
AT vanaclochaespim constructingasocioeconomicstatusindexforcolorectalcancerscreeningevaluation
AT pintocarbom constructingasocioeconomicstatusindexforcolorectalcancerscreeningevaluation
AT martinpozueloj constructingasocioeconomicstatusindexforcolorectalcancerscreeningevaluation
AT romeop constructingasocioeconomicstatusindexforcolorectalcancerscreeningevaluation
AT peiroperezr constructingasocioeconomicstatusindexforcolorectalcancerscreeningevaluation
AT baronac constructingasocioeconomicstatusindexforcolorectalcancerscreeningevaluation
AT ortizf constructingasocioeconomicstatusindexforcolorectalcancerscreeningevaluation
AT nolascoa constructingasocioeconomicstatusindexforcolorectalcancerscreeningevaluation
AT castancameos constructingasocioeconomicstatusindexforcolorectalcancerscreeningevaluation