Cargando…

Health System Performance Assessment: Does Germany provide good access to healthcare?

BACKGROUND: Providing equal access to health care is a major goal of health systems and a criterion for health system performance assessment (HSPA). The first systematic HSPA for Germany has been piloted in 2021. Access is one dimension of the conceptual framework (others are, e.g., population healt...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Blümel, M, Hengel, P, Achstetter, M, Schwarzbach, M, Busse, R
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9594503/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac131.117
_version_ 1784815435261149184
author Blümel, M
Hengel, P
Achstetter, M
Schwarzbach, M
Busse, R
author_facet Blümel, M
Hengel, P
Achstetter, M
Schwarzbach, M
Busse, R
author_sort Blümel, M
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Providing equal access to health care is a major goal of health systems and a criterion for health system performance assessment (HSPA). The first systematic HSPA for Germany has been piloted in 2021. Access is one dimension of the conceptual framework (others are, e.g., population health, quality, and efficiency), which will be analysed in the following. METHODS: Nine indicators to measure access were selected based on a systematic search of established instruments in (inter)national HSPA initiatives. Included indicators are availability and accessibility of services (e.g., waiting times) and financial risk protection, among others. Other criteria for the inclusion of indicators were data availability and international comparability. Indicators were evaluated in terms of their trend over time (2000-2020), in international comparison (e.g., Austria, Denmark, France), and according to various equity categories (e.g., age, gender, region). RESULTS: The indicator access to palliative care could not be evaluated due to lack of data. Overall, access is good in Germany. Internationally, Germany performs better than average on most of the indicators, and its performance has improved over time. Physician density in the inpatient and outpatient sectors has increased since 2000 and is above the average of comparator countries. For some specialties, physician density in rural areas is lower than in urban areas, but the gap has decreased in recent years and does not apply to primary care. Furthermore, only 0.3% of the total population report having foregone care, although they had considered it necessary. CONCLUSIONS: Nine indicators were identified and calculated to assess the performance of the German health system in terms of access to healthcare. Access can be assessed as predominantly positive, but inequities exist. Identified gaps and future extensions, e.g., additional data sources, can provide impetus for evidence-based policy management. KEY MESSAGES: • First systematic Health System Performance Assessment for Germany has been piloted. • Access to health care is good in Germany, both over time and in international comparison, but inequities exist.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9594503
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95945032022-11-22 Health System Performance Assessment: Does Germany provide good access to healthcare? Blümel, M Hengel, P Achstetter, M Schwarzbach, M Busse, R Eur J Public Health Poster Displays BACKGROUND: Providing equal access to health care is a major goal of health systems and a criterion for health system performance assessment (HSPA). The first systematic HSPA for Germany has been piloted in 2021. Access is one dimension of the conceptual framework (others are, e.g., population health, quality, and efficiency), which will be analysed in the following. METHODS: Nine indicators to measure access were selected based on a systematic search of established instruments in (inter)national HSPA initiatives. Included indicators are availability and accessibility of services (e.g., waiting times) and financial risk protection, among others. Other criteria for the inclusion of indicators were data availability and international comparability. Indicators were evaluated in terms of their trend over time (2000-2020), in international comparison (e.g., Austria, Denmark, France), and according to various equity categories (e.g., age, gender, region). RESULTS: The indicator access to palliative care could not be evaluated due to lack of data. Overall, access is good in Germany. Internationally, Germany performs better than average on most of the indicators, and its performance has improved over time. Physician density in the inpatient and outpatient sectors has increased since 2000 and is above the average of comparator countries. For some specialties, physician density in rural areas is lower than in urban areas, but the gap has decreased in recent years and does not apply to primary care. Furthermore, only 0.3% of the total population report having foregone care, although they had considered it necessary. CONCLUSIONS: Nine indicators were identified and calculated to assess the performance of the German health system in terms of access to healthcare. Access can be assessed as predominantly positive, but inequities exist. Identified gaps and future extensions, e.g., additional data sources, can provide impetus for evidence-based policy management. KEY MESSAGES: • First systematic Health System Performance Assessment for Germany has been piloted. • Access to health care is good in Germany, both over time and in international comparison, but inequities exist. Oxford University Press 2022-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9594503/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac131.117 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Poster Displays
Blümel, M
Hengel, P
Achstetter, M
Schwarzbach, M
Busse, R
Health System Performance Assessment: Does Germany provide good access to healthcare?
title Health System Performance Assessment: Does Germany provide good access to healthcare?
title_full Health System Performance Assessment: Does Germany provide good access to healthcare?
title_fullStr Health System Performance Assessment: Does Germany provide good access to healthcare?
title_full_unstemmed Health System Performance Assessment: Does Germany provide good access to healthcare?
title_short Health System Performance Assessment: Does Germany provide good access to healthcare?
title_sort health system performance assessment: does germany provide good access to healthcare?
topic Poster Displays
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9594503/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac131.117
work_keys_str_mv AT blumelm healthsystemperformanceassessmentdoesgermanyprovidegoodaccesstohealthcare
AT hengelp healthsystemperformanceassessmentdoesgermanyprovidegoodaccesstohealthcare
AT achstetterm healthsystemperformanceassessmentdoesgermanyprovidegoodaccesstohealthcare
AT schwarzbachm healthsystemperformanceassessmentdoesgermanyprovidegoodaccesstohealthcare
AT busser healthsystemperformanceassessmentdoesgermanyprovidegoodaccesstohealthcare