Cargando…

Differentiating vaccine reactions from invasive bacterial infections in young infants presenting to the emergency department in the 4CMenB era: a retrospective observational comparison

BACKGROUND: Differentiating infants with adverse events following immunisation (AEFIs) or invasive bacterial infection (IBI) is a significant clinical challenge. Young infants post vaccination are therefore often admitted to the hospital for parenteral antibiotics to avoid missing rare cases of IBI....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Channon-Wells, Samuel William, Tough, Emily, So, Neda, O'Connor, Daniel, Snape, Matthew D
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9594504/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36645742
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2022-001559
_version_ 1784815435530633216
author Channon-Wells, Samuel William
Tough, Emily
So, Neda
O'Connor, Daniel
Snape, Matthew D
author_facet Channon-Wells, Samuel William
Tough, Emily
So, Neda
O'Connor, Daniel
Snape, Matthew D
author_sort Channon-Wells, Samuel William
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Differentiating infants with adverse events following immunisation (AEFIs) or invasive bacterial infection (IBI) is a significant clinical challenge. Young infants post vaccination are therefore often admitted to the hospital for parenteral antibiotics to avoid missing rare cases of IBI. METHODS: During a service evaluation project, we conducted a single-centre retrospective observational study of infants with IBI, urinary tract infection (UTI) or AEFI from two previously published cohorts. All patients presented to hospital in Oxfordshire, UK, between 2011 and 2018, spanning the introduction of the capsular group-B meningococcal vaccine (4CMenB) into routine immunisation schedules. Data collection from paper and electronic notes were unblinded. Clinical features, including National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) ‘traffic light’ risk of severe illness and laboratory tests performed on presentation, were described, and comparisons made using regression models, adjusting for age and sex. We also compared biochemical results on presentation to those of well infants post vaccination, with and without 4CMenB regimens. RESULTS: The study included 232 infants: 40 with IBI, 97 with probable AEFI, 24 with possible AEFI, 27 with UTI and 44 post vaccination ‘well’ infants. C-reactive protein (CRP) was the only discriminatory blood marker, with CRP values above 83 mg/L only observed in infants with IBI or UTI. NICE risk stratification was significantly different between groups but still missed cases of IBI, and classification as intermediate risk was non-differential. Fever was more common in probable AEFI cases, while seizures and rashes were equally frequent. Diarrhoea and clinician-reported irritability or rigours were all more common in IBI. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical features on presentation may aid risk stratification but cannot reliably differentiate IBI from AEFI in infants presenting to the emergency department. Blood results are generally unhelpful due to post vaccination inflammatory responses, particularly in children receiving 4CMenB vaccination. Improved biomarkers and clinical prediction tools are required to aid management in febrile infants post vaccination.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9594504
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95945042022-10-26 Differentiating vaccine reactions from invasive bacterial infections in young infants presenting to the emergency department in the 4CMenB era: a retrospective observational comparison Channon-Wells, Samuel William Tough, Emily So, Neda O'Connor, Daniel Snape, Matthew D BMJ Paediatr Open Accident & Emergency BACKGROUND: Differentiating infants with adverse events following immunisation (AEFIs) or invasive bacterial infection (IBI) is a significant clinical challenge. Young infants post vaccination are therefore often admitted to the hospital for parenteral antibiotics to avoid missing rare cases of IBI. METHODS: During a service evaluation project, we conducted a single-centre retrospective observational study of infants with IBI, urinary tract infection (UTI) or AEFI from two previously published cohorts. All patients presented to hospital in Oxfordshire, UK, between 2011 and 2018, spanning the introduction of the capsular group-B meningococcal vaccine (4CMenB) into routine immunisation schedules. Data collection from paper and electronic notes were unblinded. Clinical features, including National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) ‘traffic light’ risk of severe illness and laboratory tests performed on presentation, were described, and comparisons made using regression models, adjusting for age and sex. We also compared biochemical results on presentation to those of well infants post vaccination, with and without 4CMenB regimens. RESULTS: The study included 232 infants: 40 with IBI, 97 with probable AEFI, 24 with possible AEFI, 27 with UTI and 44 post vaccination ‘well’ infants. C-reactive protein (CRP) was the only discriminatory blood marker, with CRP values above 83 mg/L only observed in infants with IBI or UTI. NICE risk stratification was significantly different between groups but still missed cases of IBI, and classification as intermediate risk was non-differential. Fever was more common in probable AEFI cases, while seizures and rashes were equally frequent. Diarrhoea and clinician-reported irritability or rigours were all more common in IBI. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical features on presentation may aid risk stratification but cannot reliably differentiate IBI from AEFI in infants presenting to the emergency department. Blood results are generally unhelpful due to post vaccination inflammatory responses, particularly in children receiving 4CMenB vaccination. Improved biomarkers and clinical prediction tools are required to aid management in febrile infants post vaccination. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9594504/ /pubmed/36645742 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2022-001559 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Accident & Emergency
Channon-Wells, Samuel William
Tough, Emily
So, Neda
O'Connor, Daniel
Snape, Matthew D
Differentiating vaccine reactions from invasive bacterial infections in young infants presenting to the emergency department in the 4CMenB era: a retrospective observational comparison
title Differentiating vaccine reactions from invasive bacterial infections in young infants presenting to the emergency department in the 4CMenB era: a retrospective observational comparison
title_full Differentiating vaccine reactions from invasive bacterial infections in young infants presenting to the emergency department in the 4CMenB era: a retrospective observational comparison
title_fullStr Differentiating vaccine reactions from invasive bacterial infections in young infants presenting to the emergency department in the 4CMenB era: a retrospective observational comparison
title_full_unstemmed Differentiating vaccine reactions from invasive bacterial infections in young infants presenting to the emergency department in the 4CMenB era: a retrospective observational comparison
title_short Differentiating vaccine reactions from invasive bacterial infections in young infants presenting to the emergency department in the 4CMenB era: a retrospective observational comparison
title_sort differentiating vaccine reactions from invasive bacterial infections in young infants presenting to the emergency department in the 4cmenb era: a retrospective observational comparison
topic Accident & Emergency
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9594504/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36645742
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2022-001559
work_keys_str_mv AT channonwellssamuelwilliam differentiatingvaccinereactionsfrominvasivebacterialinfectionsinyounginfantspresentingtotheemergencydepartmentinthe4cmenberaaretrospectiveobservationalcomparison
AT toughemily differentiatingvaccinereactionsfrominvasivebacterialinfectionsinyounginfantspresentingtotheemergencydepartmentinthe4cmenberaaretrospectiveobservationalcomparison
AT soneda differentiatingvaccinereactionsfrominvasivebacterialinfectionsinyounginfantspresentingtotheemergencydepartmentinthe4cmenberaaretrospectiveobservationalcomparison
AT oconnordaniel differentiatingvaccinereactionsfrominvasivebacterialinfectionsinyounginfantspresentingtotheemergencydepartmentinthe4cmenberaaretrospectiveobservationalcomparison
AT snapematthewd differentiatingvaccinereactionsfrominvasivebacterialinfectionsinyounginfantspresentingtotheemergencydepartmentinthe4cmenberaaretrospectiveobservationalcomparison