Cargando…

Motivations and strategies underlying the adoption of the front-of-pack labelling scheme Nutri-Score

 : Front-of-pack nutrition labellings (FoPL) have gained traction in the European Union as tools to tackle the burden of nutrition-related chronic diseases. Multiple FoPL have been implemented by both governments and private actors. Under the European food labelling regulation, any FoPL is optional...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sarda, B, Fialon, M, Ducrot, P, Serry, AJ, Galan, P, Kesse-Guyot, E, Hercberg, S, Touvier, M, Julia, C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9594549/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac130.099
_version_ 1784815446855254016
author Sarda, B
Fialon, M
Ducrot, P
Serry, AJ
Galan, P
Kesse-Guyot, E
Hercberg, S
Touvier, M
Julia, C
author_facet Sarda, B
Fialon, M
Ducrot, P
Serry, AJ
Galan, P
Kesse-Guyot, E
Hercberg, S
Touvier, M
Julia, C
author_sort Sarda, B
collection PubMed
description  : Front-of-pack nutrition labellings (FoPL) have gained traction in the European Union as tools to tackle the burden of nutrition-related chronic diseases. Multiple FoPL have been implemented by both governments and private actors. Under the European food labelling regulation, any FoPL is optional to display, although the legal framework is being revised for a harmonized FoPL to emerge. Since the implementation of the Nutri-Score in France in 2017, little data is available to understand the motivations and strategies underlying the adoption of the FoPL from a food business’ perspective. A cross-sectional study was conducted in March 2021 on food businesses having adopted the Nutri-Score in France through an online questionnaire. In total, 121 businesses completed the questionnaire, representing 32% of companies adopting the scheme and covering a variety of company types. Engaged businesses had a rather healthier portfolio of products according to the Nutri-Score (on average, 69% of engaged products were A or B and 12% were D or E), with disparities between retailers and national brands. Businesses mostly reported their engagement was motivated by a will to be transparent (76%) and to simplify nutritional information (67%) but still 19% reported that they engaged following external pressures. External pressures were more likely to play a role in the engagement if the company engaged in 2020 compared to those engaged before 2018 (P = 0.032), if the company was larger (P = 0.044) and if the scope of engagement included D or E products (poorer nutritional quality) (P = 0.033). Our study showed that the Nutri-Score, as an optional measure, is mainly used by businesses, especially national brands, as a tool to promote rather healthier products, while companies with products of lower nutritional quality are more likely to engage following external pressure. This highlights the relevance of enforcing a mandatory FoPL system, in line with the Farm to Fork strategy. KEY MESSAGES: Nutri-Score led to a selective use of the measure by food businesses, especially national brands, to promote rather healthier products. The relatively low engagement of companies with low nutritional value products highlights the relevance of enforcing a mandatory FoPL system, in line with the Farm to Fork strategy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9594549
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95945492022-11-22 Motivations and strategies underlying the adoption of the front-of-pack labelling scheme Nutri-Score Sarda, B Fialon, M Ducrot, P Serry, AJ Galan, P Kesse-Guyot, E Hercberg, S Touvier, M Julia, C Eur J Public Health Poster Walks  : Front-of-pack nutrition labellings (FoPL) have gained traction in the European Union as tools to tackle the burden of nutrition-related chronic diseases. Multiple FoPL have been implemented by both governments and private actors. Under the European food labelling regulation, any FoPL is optional to display, although the legal framework is being revised for a harmonized FoPL to emerge. Since the implementation of the Nutri-Score in France in 2017, little data is available to understand the motivations and strategies underlying the adoption of the FoPL from a food business’ perspective. A cross-sectional study was conducted in March 2021 on food businesses having adopted the Nutri-Score in France through an online questionnaire. In total, 121 businesses completed the questionnaire, representing 32% of companies adopting the scheme and covering a variety of company types. Engaged businesses had a rather healthier portfolio of products according to the Nutri-Score (on average, 69% of engaged products were A or B and 12% were D or E), with disparities between retailers and national brands. Businesses mostly reported their engagement was motivated by a will to be transparent (76%) and to simplify nutritional information (67%) but still 19% reported that they engaged following external pressures. External pressures were more likely to play a role in the engagement if the company engaged in 2020 compared to those engaged before 2018 (P = 0.032), if the company was larger (P = 0.044) and if the scope of engagement included D or E products (poorer nutritional quality) (P = 0.033). Our study showed that the Nutri-Score, as an optional measure, is mainly used by businesses, especially national brands, as a tool to promote rather healthier products, while companies with products of lower nutritional quality are more likely to engage following external pressure. This highlights the relevance of enforcing a mandatory FoPL system, in line with the Farm to Fork strategy. KEY MESSAGES: Nutri-Score led to a selective use of the measure by food businesses, especially national brands, to promote rather healthier products. The relatively low engagement of companies with low nutritional value products highlights the relevance of enforcing a mandatory FoPL system, in line with the Farm to Fork strategy. Oxford University Press 2022-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9594549/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac130.099 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Poster Walks
Sarda, B
Fialon, M
Ducrot, P
Serry, AJ
Galan, P
Kesse-Guyot, E
Hercberg, S
Touvier, M
Julia, C
Motivations and strategies underlying the adoption of the front-of-pack labelling scheme Nutri-Score
title Motivations and strategies underlying the adoption of the front-of-pack labelling scheme Nutri-Score
title_full Motivations and strategies underlying the adoption of the front-of-pack labelling scheme Nutri-Score
title_fullStr Motivations and strategies underlying the adoption of the front-of-pack labelling scheme Nutri-Score
title_full_unstemmed Motivations and strategies underlying the adoption of the front-of-pack labelling scheme Nutri-Score
title_short Motivations and strategies underlying the adoption of the front-of-pack labelling scheme Nutri-Score
title_sort motivations and strategies underlying the adoption of the front-of-pack labelling scheme nutri-score
topic Poster Walks
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9594549/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac130.099
work_keys_str_mv AT sardab motivationsandstrategiesunderlyingtheadoptionofthefrontofpacklabellingschemenutriscore
AT fialonm motivationsandstrategiesunderlyingtheadoptionofthefrontofpacklabellingschemenutriscore
AT ducrotp motivationsandstrategiesunderlyingtheadoptionofthefrontofpacklabellingschemenutriscore
AT serryaj motivationsandstrategiesunderlyingtheadoptionofthefrontofpacklabellingschemenutriscore
AT galanp motivationsandstrategiesunderlyingtheadoptionofthefrontofpacklabellingschemenutriscore
AT kesseguyote motivationsandstrategiesunderlyingtheadoptionofthefrontofpacklabellingschemenutriscore
AT hercbergs motivationsandstrategiesunderlyingtheadoptionofthefrontofpacklabellingschemenutriscore
AT touvierm motivationsandstrategiesunderlyingtheadoptionofthefrontofpacklabellingschemenutriscore
AT juliac motivationsandstrategiesunderlyingtheadoptionofthefrontofpacklabellingschemenutriscore