Cargando…
Motivations and strategies underlying the adoption of the front-of-pack labelling scheme Nutri-Score
: Front-of-pack nutrition labellings (FoPL) have gained traction in the European Union as tools to tackle the burden of nutrition-related chronic diseases. Multiple FoPL have been implemented by both governments and private actors. Under the European food labelling regulation, any FoPL is optional...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9594549/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac130.099 |
_version_ | 1784815446855254016 |
---|---|
author | Sarda, B Fialon, M Ducrot, P Serry, AJ Galan, P Kesse-Guyot, E Hercberg, S Touvier, M Julia, C |
author_facet | Sarda, B Fialon, M Ducrot, P Serry, AJ Galan, P Kesse-Guyot, E Hercberg, S Touvier, M Julia, C |
author_sort | Sarda, B |
collection | PubMed |
description | : Front-of-pack nutrition labellings (FoPL) have gained traction in the European Union as tools to tackle the burden of nutrition-related chronic diseases. Multiple FoPL have been implemented by both governments and private actors. Under the European food labelling regulation, any FoPL is optional to display, although the legal framework is being revised for a harmonized FoPL to emerge. Since the implementation of the Nutri-Score in France in 2017, little data is available to understand the motivations and strategies underlying the adoption of the FoPL from a food business’ perspective. A cross-sectional study was conducted in March 2021 on food businesses having adopted the Nutri-Score in France through an online questionnaire. In total, 121 businesses completed the questionnaire, representing 32% of companies adopting the scheme and covering a variety of company types. Engaged businesses had a rather healthier portfolio of products according to the Nutri-Score (on average, 69% of engaged products were A or B and 12% were D or E), with disparities between retailers and national brands. Businesses mostly reported their engagement was motivated by a will to be transparent (76%) and to simplify nutritional information (67%) but still 19% reported that they engaged following external pressures. External pressures were more likely to play a role in the engagement if the company engaged in 2020 compared to those engaged before 2018 (P = 0.032), if the company was larger (P = 0.044) and if the scope of engagement included D or E products (poorer nutritional quality) (P = 0.033). Our study showed that the Nutri-Score, as an optional measure, is mainly used by businesses, especially national brands, as a tool to promote rather healthier products, while companies with products of lower nutritional quality are more likely to engage following external pressure. This highlights the relevance of enforcing a mandatory FoPL system, in line with the Farm to Fork strategy. KEY MESSAGES: Nutri-Score led to a selective use of the measure by food businesses, especially national brands, to promote rather healthier products. The relatively low engagement of companies with low nutritional value products highlights the relevance of enforcing a mandatory FoPL system, in line with the Farm to Fork strategy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9594549 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95945492022-11-22 Motivations and strategies underlying the adoption of the front-of-pack labelling scheme Nutri-Score Sarda, B Fialon, M Ducrot, P Serry, AJ Galan, P Kesse-Guyot, E Hercberg, S Touvier, M Julia, C Eur J Public Health Poster Walks : Front-of-pack nutrition labellings (FoPL) have gained traction in the European Union as tools to tackle the burden of nutrition-related chronic diseases. Multiple FoPL have been implemented by both governments and private actors. Under the European food labelling regulation, any FoPL is optional to display, although the legal framework is being revised for a harmonized FoPL to emerge. Since the implementation of the Nutri-Score in France in 2017, little data is available to understand the motivations and strategies underlying the adoption of the FoPL from a food business’ perspective. A cross-sectional study was conducted in March 2021 on food businesses having adopted the Nutri-Score in France through an online questionnaire. In total, 121 businesses completed the questionnaire, representing 32% of companies adopting the scheme and covering a variety of company types. Engaged businesses had a rather healthier portfolio of products according to the Nutri-Score (on average, 69% of engaged products were A or B and 12% were D or E), with disparities between retailers and national brands. Businesses mostly reported their engagement was motivated by a will to be transparent (76%) and to simplify nutritional information (67%) but still 19% reported that they engaged following external pressures. External pressures were more likely to play a role in the engagement if the company engaged in 2020 compared to those engaged before 2018 (P = 0.032), if the company was larger (P = 0.044) and if the scope of engagement included D or E products (poorer nutritional quality) (P = 0.033). Our study showed that the Nutri-Score, as an optional measure, is mainly used by businesses, especially national brands, as a tool to promote rather healthier products, while companies with products of lower nutritional quality are more likely to engage following external pressure. This highlights the relevance of enforcing a mandatory FoPL system, in line with the Farm to Fork strategy. KEY MESSAGES: Nutri-Score led to a selective use of the measure by food businesses, especially national brands, to promote rather healthier products. The relatively low engagement of companies with low nutritional value products highlights the relevance of enforcing a mandatory FoPL system, in line with the Farm to Fork strategy. Oxford University Press 2022-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9594549/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac130.099 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Poster Walks Sarda, B Fialon, M Ducrot, P Serry, AJ Galan, P Kesse-Guyot, E Hercberg, S Touvier, M Julia, C Motivations and strategies underlying the adoption of the front-of-pack labelling scheme Nutri-Score |
title | Motivations and strategies underlying the adoption of the front-of-pack labelling scheme Nutri-Score |
title_full | Motivations and strategies underlying the adoption of the front-of-pack labelling scheme Nutri-Score |
title_fullStr | Motivations and strategies underlying the adoption of the front-of-pack labelling scheme Nutri-Score |
title_full_unstemmed | Motivations and strategies underlying the adoption of the front-of-pack labelling scheme Nutri-Score |
title_short | Motivations and strategies underlying the adoption of the front-of-pack labelling scheme Nutri-Score |
title_sort | motivations and strategies underlying the adoption of the front-of-pack labelling scheme nutri-score |
topic | Poster Walks |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9594549/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac130.099 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sardab motivationsandstrategiesunderlyingtheadoptionofthefrontofpacklabellingschemenutriscore AT fialonm motivationsandstrategiesunderlyingtheadoptionofthefrontofpacklabellingschemenutriscore AT ducrotp motivationsandstrategiesunderlyingtheadoptionofthefrontofpacklabellingschemenutriscore AT serryaj motivationsandstrategiesunderlyingtheadoptionofthefrontofpacklabellingschemenutriscore AT galanp motivationsandstrategiesunderlyingtheadoptionofthefrontofpacklabellingschemenutriscore AT kesseguyote motivationsandstrategiesunderlyingtheadoptionofthefrontofpacklabellingschemenutriscore AT hercbergs motivationsandstrategiesunderlyingtheadoptionofthefrontofpacklabellingschemenutriscore AT touvierm motivationsandstrategiesunderlyingtheadoptionofthefrontofpacklabellingschemenutriscore AT juliac motivationsandstrategiesunderlyingtheadoptionofthefrontofpacklabellingschemenutriscore |