Cargando…

Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for care quality assessment of a breast cancer Care Pathway

BACKGROUND: Breast Cancer (BC) is the most common type of cancer among women in Europe, accounting for around 28% of newly diagnosed female cancers. A clinical Pathway (CP) is an effective tool able to deliver high quality care especially if linked to a Monitoring System. Still, it is essential to i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Angioletti, C, de Mattia, E, Perilli, A, de Belvis, AG
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9594620/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac131.293
_version_ 1784815464992473088
author Angioletti, C
de Mattia, E
Perilli, A
de Belvis, AG
author_facet Angioletti, C
de Mattia, E
Perilli, A
de Belvis, AG
author_sort Angioletti, C
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Breast Cancer (BC) is the most common type of cancer among women in Europe, accounting for around 28% of newly diagnosed female cancers. A clinical Pathway (CP) is an effective tool able to deliver high quality care especially if linked to a Monitoring System. Still, it is essential to integrate them with the patient’s perspective according to Value-Based Care. This paper aims to define and test a tool for care quality assessment in patients with breast cancer, in a value-based perspective. METHODS: A scoping search of the main databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science) and official websites of institutions and organizations (AIOM, CIPOMO, EORTC, ICHOM, Istat) was carried out. A Delphi survey was conducted to assess the tool, according to four criteria (general relevance, evidence-based, measurability, actionability). We only included indicators that achieved strong agreement. Time-points for data collection were defined and validated in relation to the different steps of the CP. RESULTS: The final tool consists of 21 questions coming from the following sources: BREAST-Q and EORT QLQ-BR23 questionnaire. BREAST-Q’s questions, have to be administered at T0 (first medical contact) and T12 (follow-up), while the EORT QLQ-BR23’s questions have to be administered at T0 (first medical contact) T Surgery, T6 (follow-up) and T12 (follow-up). The survey will be administered to a sample of 152 BC patients (MOE 5%; CL 95%) undergoing surgery in the period June-September 2021. CONCLUSIONS: The present tool will give a quick view of Value provided by the CP to these patients. In light of the high volume of patients treated at our center (1008 breast cancer surgery hospitalisations in 2020), this study acquires further public health relevance. Additionally, this approach can be extended for further evaluation of other CPs. KEY MESSAGES: • We assess care quality for Breast Cancer patients in a large hospital in Italy through Patient-Reported Outcome Measures, based on an evidence-based, Value-based, Delphi-validated tool. • Assessing Value brought to patients with Breast Cancer gives a unique perspective on care quality assessment and paves the way for further quality improvements and extension to other health issues.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9594620
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95946202022-11-22 Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for care quality assessment of a breast cancer Care Pathway Angioletti, C de Mattia, E Perilli, A de Belvis, AG Eur J Public Health Poster Displays BACKGROUND: Breast Cancer (BC) is the most common type of cancer among women in Europe, accounting for around 28% of newly diagnosed female cancers. A clinical Pathway (CP) is an effective tool able to deliver high quality care especially if linked to a Monitoring System. Still, it is essential to integrate them with the patient’s perspective according to Value-Based Care. This paper aims to define and test a tool for care quality assessment in patients with breast cancer, in a value-based perspective. METHODS: A scoping search of the main databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science) and official websites of institutions and organizations (AIOM, CIPOMO, EORTC, ICHOM, Istat) was carried out. A Delphi survey was conducted to assess the tool, according to four criteria (general relevance, evidence-based, measurability, actionability). We only included indicators that achieved strong agreement. Time-points for data collection were defined and validated in relation to the different steps of the CP. RESULTS: The final tool consists of 21 questions coming from the following sources: BREAST-Q and EORT QLQ-BR23 questionnaire. BREAST-Q’s questions, have to be administered at T0 (first medical contact) and T12 (follow-up), while the EORT QLQ-BR23’s questions have to be administered at T0 (first medical contact) T Surgery, T6 (follow-up) and T12 (follow-up). The survey will be administered to a sample of 152 BC patients (MOE 5%; CL 95%) undergoing surgery in the period June-September 2021. CONCLUSIONS: The present tool will give a quick view of Value provided by the CP to these patients. In light of the high volume of patients treated at our center (1008 breast cancer surgery hospitalisations in 2020), this study acquires further public health relevance. Additionally, this approach can be extended for further evaluation of other CPs. KEY MESSAGES: • We assess care quality for Breast Cancer patients in a large hospital in Italy through Patient-Reported Outcome Measures, based on an evidence-based, Value-based, Delphi-validated tool. • Assessing Value brought to patients with Breast Cancer gives a unique perspective on care quality assessment and paves the way for further quality improvements and extension to other health issues. Oxford University Press 2022-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9594620/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac131.293 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Poster Displays
Angioletti, C
de Mattia, E
Perilli, A
de Belvis, AG
Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for care quality assessment of a breast cancer Care Pathway
title Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for care quality assessment of a breast cancer Care Pathway
title_full Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for care quality assessment of a breast cancer Care Pathway
title_fullStr Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for care quality assessment of a breast cancer Care Pathway
title_full_unstemmed Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for care quality assessment of a breast cancer Care Pathway
title_short Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for care quality assessment of a breast cancer Care Pathway
title_sort patient-reported outcome measures for care quality assessment of a breast cancer care pathway
topic Poster Displays
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9594620/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac131.293
work_keys_str_mv AT angiolettic patientreportedoutcomemeasuresforcarequalityassessmentofabreastcancercarepathway
AT demattiae patientreportedoutcomemeasuresforcarequalityassessmentofabreastcancercarepathway
AT perillia patientreportedoutcomemeasuresforcarequalityassessmentofabreastcancercarepathway
AT debelvisag patientreportedoutcomemeasuresforcarequalityassessmentofabreastcancercarepathway