Cargando…
Is it really possible to leave sars-cov-2 outside the door?: Bianca Maria Bocci
BACKGROUND: In this historical period, it has become very important to live in healthy environments. By using everyday objects, cross-contamination is possible because of prolonged microbial persistence on surfaces. UV-C irradiation is an environmentally friendly method to disinfect objects as no ha...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9594726/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac131.072 |
_version_ | 1784815493521080320 |
---|---|
author | Bocci, BM De Palma, I Amodeo, D Cevenini, G Nante, N Messina, G |
author_facet | Bocci, BM De Palma, I Amodeo, D Cevenini, G Nante, N Messina, G |
author_sort | Bocci, BM |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In this historical period, it has become very important to live in healthy environments. By using everyday objects, cross-contamination is possible because of prolonged microbial persistence on surfaces. UV-C irradiation is an environmentally friendly method to disinfect objects as no harmful chemicals or heat are involved. This study aims to determine the virucidal activity, against SARS-CoV-2, of UV-C irradiation occurring in a designed UV device, ‘Purity Capsule'. METHODS: An experimental study was performed in September 2020. The ‘Purity capsule’ has an 11 W lamp (3.5W UV-C) positioned in the centre of the device. The lamp has a dome covered with a reflective, protective coating. Three metal carriers were placed at the maximum distance from the UV-C lamp in three different positions and tested at 30 and 60 seconds 3 times. The carriers were inoculated with 100 µL of SARS-CoV-2 viral suspension with a concentration of 106.5 TCID50 /mL. After treatment, laboratory procedures were used to transfer the treated virus from carriers to multiwell plates. The samples were compared with positive controls (not exposed to UV-C light) after incubation, at 37 °C in 5% COÕ · in a humidified atmosphere, for 3 days. The residual viral activity was tested by assessing the 50% infectious dose per tissue culture (TCID50%). RESULTS: Tests performed at 30 seconds of UV-C irradiation show an average viral reduction of 4.0 Log10 (99.99%). All three tests performed at 60 seconds reached the maximum measurable log10 viral reduction: 5.0 Log10 (99.999%). CONCLUSIONS: The study assessed the effectiveness of the device in significantly reducing the viral load on all carriers regardless exposure time and distance from the UV-C light source, with no impact on the level of environmental pollution. KEY MESSAGES: • UV-C light has the property of inactivating viral growth; its physical approach is considered a good compromise between cost and effectiveness. • The device was effective in disinfecting all small everyday objects tested. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9594726 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95947262022-11-04 Is it really possible to leave sars-cov-2 outside the door?: Bianca Maria Bocci Bocci, BM De Palma, I Amodeo, D Cevenini, G Nante, N Messina, G Eur J Public Health Poster Displays BACKGROUND: In this historical period, it has become very important to live in healthy environments. By using everyday objects, cross-contamination is possible because of prolonged microbial persistence on surfaces. UV-C irradiation is an environmentally friendly method to disinfect objects as no harmful chemicals or heat are involved. This study aims to determine the virucidal activity, against SARS-CoV-2, of UV-C irradiation occurring in a designed UV device, ‘Purity Capsule'. METHODS: An experimental study was performed in September 2020. The ‘Purity capsule’ has an 11 W lamp (3.5W UV-C) positioned in the centre of the device. The lamp has a dome covered with a reflective, protective coating. Three metal carriers were placed at the maximum distance from the UV-C lamp in three different positions and tested at 30 and 60 seconds 3 times. The carriers were inoculated with 100 µL of SARS-CoV-2 viral suspension with a concentration of 106.5 TCID50 /mL. After treatment, laboratory procedures were used to transfer the treated virus from carriers to multiwell plates. The samples were compared with positive controls (not exposed to UV-C light) after incubation, at 37 °C in 5% COÕ · in a humidified atmosphere, for 3 days. The residual viral activity was tested by assessing the 50% infectious dose per tissue culture (TCID50%). RESULTS: Tests performed at 30 seconds of UV-C irradiation show an average viral reduction of 4.0 Log10 (99.99%). All three tests performed at 60 seconds reached the maximum measurable log10 viral reduction: 5.0 Log10 (99.999%). CONCLUSIONS: The study assessed the effectiveness of the device in significantly reducing the viral load on all carriers regardless exposure time and distance from the UV-C light source, with no impact on the level of environmental pollution. KEY MESSAGES: • UV-C light has the property of inactivating viral growth; its physical approach is considered a good compromise between cost and effectiveness. • The device was effective in disinfecting all small everyday objects tested. Oxford University Press 2022-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9594726/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac131.072 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Poster Displays Bocci, BM De Palma, I Amodeo, D Cevenini, G Nante, N Messina, G Is it really possible to leave sars-cov-2 outside the door?: Bianca Maria Bocci |
title | Is it really possible to leave sars-cov-2 outside the door?: Bianca Maria Bocci |
title_full | Is it really possible to leave sars-cov-2 outside the door?: Bianca Maria Bocci |
title_fullStr | Is it really possible to leave sars-cov-2 outside the door?: Bianca Maria Bocci |
title_full_unstemmed | Is it really possible to leave sars-cov-2 outside the door?: Bianca Maria Bocci |
title_short | Is it really possible to leave sars-cov-2 outside the door?: Bianca Maria Bocci |
title_sort | is it really possible to leave sars-cov-2 outside the door?: bianca maria bocci |
topic | Poster Displays |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9594726/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac131.072 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT boccibm isitreallypossibletoleavesarscov2outsidethedoorbiancamariabocci AT depalmai isitreallypossibletoleavesarscov2outsidethedoorbiancamariabocci AT amodeod isitreallypossibletoleavesarscov2outsidethedoorbiancamariabocci AT ceveninig isitreallypossibletoleavesarscov2outsidethedoorbiancamariabocci AT nanten isitreallypossibletoleavesarscov2outsidethedoorbiancamariabocci AT messinag isitreallypossibletoleavesarscov2outsidethedoorbiancamariabocci |