Cargando…

6.Q. Skills building seminar: Integrating social inequalities in the burden of disease framework

 : Driven by the influential Global Burden of Disease (GBD) study, the burden of disease (BOD) approach has gained wide interest at national and international level to quantify the state of health and health inequalities. Central to the BOD approach is the Disability-Adjusted Life Year (DALY) metric...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9594746/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac129.399
_version_ 1784815498717822976
collection PubMed
description  : Driven by the influential Global Burden of Disease (GBD) study, the burden of disease (BOD) approach has gained wide interest at national and international level to quantify the state of health and health inequalities. Central to the BOD approach is the Disability-Adjusted Life Year (DALY) metric, which quantifies the health impact of diseases, injuries and risk factors as the number of healthy life years lost compared to a counterfactual scenario of perfect health all life long. The BOD approach offers a valuable platform to quantify social inequalities in health, i.e., differences in health status by socioeconomic and sociodemographic characteristics. This is highly relevant, as health inequalities penalising socially disadvantaged groups are one of the most consistent, and persistent, findings in epidemiology, for almost every health outcome and socioeconomic indicator. Monitoring social inequalities in health is therefore a key priority for national health authorities. There are different ways by which social inequalities can be integrated in the BOD framework, but all come with important data challenges. Individual-level stratification is a common approach for quantifying inequalities by age and sex, but is more challenging for other sociodemographic and socioeconomic indicators. Area-level stratification allows for ecological analyses between BOD estimates and indices of social deprivation. Social inequalities can also be assessed using comparative risk assessment, by which the relative risk for adverse health outcomes in function of social position is to be quantified. This skills building workshop will present the methods that have been applied in different national burden of disease studies to include social inequalities, including a discussion of their strengths and weaknesses. By providing a step-by-step presentation of how the methods have been applied, attendees will gain unique insights in the different ways by which social inequalities can be integrated in the BOD framework. KEY MESSAGES: • The burden of disease framework offers a valuable platform to quantify and monitor social inequalities in health, which is a key priority for health authorities. • Attendees will receive an overview of the different ways by which social inequalities can be integrated in the burden of disease framework, including a discussion of their strengths and weaknesses.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9594746
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95947462022-11-22 6.Q. Skills building seminar: Integrating social inequalities in the burden of disease framework Eur J Public Health Parallel Programme  : Driven by the influential Global Burden of Disease (GBD) study, the burden of disease (BOD) approach has gained wide interest at national and international level to quantify the state of health and health inequalities. Central to the BOD approach is the Disability-Adjusted Life Year (DALY) metric, which quantifies the health impact of diseases, injuries and risk factors as the number of healthy life years lost compared to a counterfactual scenario of perfect health all life long. The BOD approach offers a valuable platform to quantify social inequalities in health, i.e., differences in health status by socioeconomic and sociodemographic characteristics. This is highly relevant, as health inequalities penalising socially disadvantaged groups are one of the most consistent, and persistent, findings in epidemiology, for almost every health outcome and socioeconomic indicator. Monitoring social inequalities in health is therefore a key priority for national health authorities. There are different ways by which social inequalities can be integrated in the BOD framework, but all come with important data challenges. Individual-level stratification is a common approach for quantifying inequalities by age and sex, but is more challenging for other sociodemographic and socioeconomic indicators. Area-level stratification allows for ecological analyses between BOD estimates and indices of social deprivation. Social inequalities can also be assessed using comparative risk assessment, by which the relative risk for adverse health outcomes in function of social position is to be quantified. This skills building workshop will present the methods that have been applied in different national burden of disease studies to include social inequalities, including a discussion of their strengths and weaknesses. By providing a step-by-step presentation of how the methods have been applied, attendees will gain unique insights in the different ways by which social inequalities can be integrated in the BOD framework. KEY MESSAGES: • The burden of disease framework offers a valuable platform to quantify and monitor social inequalities in health, which is a key priority for health authorities. • Attendees will receive an overview of the different ways by which social inequalities can be integrated in the burden of disease framework, including a discussion of their strengths and weaknesses. Oxford University Press 2022-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9594746/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac129.399 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Parallel Programme
6.Q. Skills building seminar: Integrating social inequalities in the burden of disease framework
title 6.Q. Skills building seminar: Integrating social inequalities in the burden of disease framework
title_full 6.Q. Skills building seminar: Integrating social inequalities in the burden of disease framework
title_fullStr 6.Q. Skills building seminar: Integrating social inequalities in the burden of disease framework
title_full_unstemmed 6.Q. Skills building seminar: Integrating social inequalities in the burden of disease framework
title_short 6.Q. Skills building seminar: Integrating social inequalities in the burden of disease framework
title_sort 6.q. skills building seminar: integrating social inequalities in the burden of disease framework
topic Parallel Programme
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9594746/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac129.399
work_keys_str_mv AT 6qskillsbuildingseminarintegratingsocialinequalitiesintheburdenofdiseaseframework
AT 6qskillsbuildingseminarintegratingsocialinequalitiesintheburdenofdiseaseframework