Cargando…

Efficacy and safety of carbon ion radiotherapy for bone sarcomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to systematically evaluate and conduct a meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of carbon ion radiotherapy for bone sarcomas. METHODS: We searched for articles using the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and the Web of Science databases from their inception to January 1...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dong, Meng, Liu, Ruifeng, Zhang, Qiuning, Luo, Hongtao, Wang, Dandan, Wang, Yuhang, Chen, Junru, Ou, Yuhong, Wang, Xiaohu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9594886/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36284346
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-022-02089-0
_version_ 1784815531724898304
author Dong, Meng
Liu, Ruifeng
Zhang, Qiuning
Luo, Hongtao
Wang, Dandan
Wang, Yuhang
Chen, Junru
Ou, Yuhong
Wang, Xiaohu
author_facet Dong, Meng
Liu, Ruifeng
Zhang, Qiuning
Luo, Hongtao
Wang, Dandan
Wang, Yuhang
Chen, Junru
Ou, Yuhong
Wang, Xiaohu
author_sort Dong, Meng
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to systematically evaluate and conduct a meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of carbon ion radiotherapy for bone sarcomas. METHODS: We searched for articles using the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and the Web of Science databases from their inception to January 12, 2022. Two researchers independently screened the literature and extracted data based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Statistical analyses were performed using STATA version 14.0. RESULTS: We searched for 4378 candidate articles, of which 12 studies were included in our study according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Of the 897 BSs patients who received carbon ion radiotherapy in the studies, 526 patients had chordoma, 255 patients had chondrosarcoma, 112 patients had osteosarcoma, and 4 patients had other sarcomas. The local control rate at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 10 years in these studies were 98.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.961–1.009, I(2) = 0%), 85.8% (95% CI = 0.687–1.030, I(2) = 91%), 86% (95% CI = 0.763–0.957, I(2) = 85.3%), 91.1% (95% CI = 0.849–0.974), 74.3% (95% CI = 0.666–0.820, I(2) = 85.2%), and 64.7% (95% CI = 0.451–0.843, I(2) = 95.3%), respectively. The overall survival rate at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 10 years in these studies were 99.9% (95% CI = 0.995–1.004, I(2) = 0%), 89.6% (95% CI = 0.811–0.980, I(2) = 96.6%), 85% (95% CI = 0.750–0.950, I(2) = 89.4%), 92.4% (95% CI = 0.866–0.982), 72.7% (95% CI = 0.609–0.844, I(2) = 95.3%), and 72.1% (95% CI = 0.661–0.781, I(2) = 46.5%), respectively. Across all studies, the incidence of acute and late toxicities was mainly grade 1 to grade 2, and grade 1 to grade 3, respectively. CONCLUSION: As an advanced radiotherapy, carbon ion radiotherapy is promising for patients with bone sarcomas that are unresectable or residual after incomplete surgery. The data indicated that carbon ion radiotherapy was safe and effective for bone sarcomas, showing promising results for local control, overall survival, and lower acute and late toxicity. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021258480. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13014-022-02089-0.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9594886
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95948862022-10-26 Efficacy and safety of carbon ion radiotherapy for bone sarcomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis Dong, Meng Liu, Ruifeng Zhang, Qiuning Luo, Hongtao Wang, Dandan Wang, Yuhang Chen, Junru Ou, Yuhong Wang, Xiaohu Radiat Oncol Review OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to systematically evaluate and conduct a meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of carbon ion radiotherapy for bone sarcomas. METHODS: We searched for articles using the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and the Web of Science databases from their inception to January 12, 2022. Two researchers independently screened the literature and extracted data based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Statistical analyses were performed using STATA version 14.0. RESULTS: We searched for 4378 candidate articles, of which 12 studies were included in our study according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Of the 897 BSs patients who received carbon ion radiotherapy in the studies, 526 patients had chordoma, 255 patients had chondrosarcoma, 112 patients had osteosarcoma, and 4 patients had other sarcomas. The local control rate at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 10 years in these studies were 98.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.961–1.009, I(2) = 0%), 85.8% (95% CI = 0.687–1.030, I(2) = 91%), 86% (95% CI = 0.763–0.957, I(2) = 85.3%), 91.1% (95% CI = 0.849–0.974), 74.3% (95% CI = 0.666–0.820, I(2) = 85.2%), and 64.7% (95% CI = 0.451–0.843, I(2) = 95.3%), respectively. The overall survival rate at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 10 years in these studies were 99.9% (95% CI = 0.995–1.004, I(2) = 0%), 89.6% (95% CI = 0.811–0.980, I(2) = 96.6%), 85% (95% CI = 0.750–0.950, I(2) = 89.4%), 92.4% (95% CI = 0.866–0.982), 72.7% (95% CI = 0.609–0.844, I(2) = 95.3%), and 72.1% (95% CI = 0.661–0.781, I(2) = 46.5%), respectively. Across all studies, the incidence of acute and late toxicities was mainly grade 1 to grade 2, and grade 1 to grade 3, respectively. CONCLUSION: As an advanced radiotherapy, carbon ion radiotherapy is promising for patients with bone sarcomas that are unresectable or residual after incomplete surgery. The data indicated that carbon ion radiotherapy was safe and effective for bone sarcomas, showing promising results for local control, overall survival, and lower acute and late toxicity. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021258480. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13014-022-02089-0. BioMed Central 2022-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9594886/ /pubmed/36284346 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-022-02089-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Review
Dong, Meng
Liu, Ruifeng
Zhang, Qiuning
Luo, Hongtao
Wang, Dandan
Wang, Yuhang
Chen, Junru
Ou, Yuhong
Wang, Xiaohu
Efficacy and safety of carbon ion radiotherapy for bone sarcomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Efficacy and safety of carbon ion radiotherapy for bone sarcomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Efficacy and safety of carbon ion radiotherapy for bone sarcomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Efficacy and safety of carbon ion radiotherapy for bone sarcomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and safety of carbon ion radiotherapy for bone sarcomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Efficacy and safety of carbon ion radiotherapy for bone sarcomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort efficacy and safety of carbon ion radiotherapy for bone sarcomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9594886/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36284346
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-022-02089-0
work_keys_str_mv AT dongmeng efficacyandsafetyofcarbonionradiotherapyforbonesarcomasasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT liuruifeng efficacyandsafetyofcarbonionradiotherapyforbonesarcomasasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhangqiuning efficacyandsafetyofcarbonionradiotherapyforbonesarcomasasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT luohongtao efficacyandsafetyofcarbonionradiotherapyforbonesarcomasasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wangdandan efficacyandsafetyofcarbonionradiotherapyforbonesarcomasasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wangyuhang efficacyandsafetyofcarbonionradiotherapyforbonesarcomasasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT chenjunru efficacyandsafetyofcarbonionradiotherapyforbonesarcomasasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT ouyuhong efficacyandsafetyofcarbonionradiotherapyforbonesarcomasasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wangxiaohu efficacyandsafetyofcarbonionradiotherapyforbonesarcomasasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis