Cargando…

Latency and Interpeak Interval Values of Auditory Brainstem Response in 73 Individuals with Normal Hearing

BACKGROUND: Auditory brainstem response (ABR) potential is important for audiological diagnosis, reflecting the integrity of the structures of the auditory system up to the brainstem. The click stimulus is the best known and is most used in clinical practice. However, different devices and examiners...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sanfins, Milaine Dominici, Colella-Santos, Maria Francisca, Ferrazoli, Natalia, Rezende, Adriano, Donadon, Caroline, Gos, Elżbieta, Skarżyński, Piotr Henryk
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9595029/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36262029
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.937847
_version_ 1784815554623700992
author Sanfins, Milaine Dominici
Colella-Santos, Maria Francisca
Ferrazoli, Natalia
Rezende, Adriano
Donadon, Caroline
Gos, Elżbieta
Skarżyński, Piotr Henryk
author_facet Sanfins, Milaine Dominici
Colella-Santos, Maria Francisca
Ferrazoli, Natalia
Rezende, Adriano
Donadon, Caroline
Gos, Elżbieta
Skarżyński, Piotr Henryk
author_sort Sanfins, Milaine Dominici
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Auditory brainstem response (ABR) potential is important for audiological diagnosis, reflecting the integrity of the structures of the auditory system up to the brainstem. The click stimulus is the best known and is most used in clinical practice. However, different devices and examiners may yield distinct results, and each institution tends to use its own parameters. We aimed to analyze the latency values of wave I, III, V, and interpeak intervals I–III, III–V, I–V values obtained in assessing ABR using a new device. MATERIAL/METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study of 73 participants with normal hearing thresholds and no hearing problems. All underwent basic audiological (air and bone conduction, Speech Recognition Threshold, Speech Recognition Index, acoustic reflex, and tympanometry) and electrophysiological evaluation (ABR assessment). RESULTS: Absolute latency and interpeak values from ABR showed earlier responses in women, faster than international standards suggest. The responses were similar to other studies carried out previously, with the exception of wave I values, which were a little earlier in females. CONCLUSIONS: We assessed normative data from measurement of latency values of wave I, III, V, and interpeak intervals I–III, III–V, and I–V applying 2 standard deviations in the assessment of ABR using the new Neuro-Audio/ABR device created by Neurosoft.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9595029
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher International Scientific Literature, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95950292022-11-02 Latency and Interpeak Interval Values of Auditory Brainstem Response in 73 Individuals with Normal Hearing Sanfins, Milaine Dominici Colella-Santos, Maria Francisca Ferrazoli, Natalia Rezende, Adriano Donadon, Caroline Gos, Elżbieta Skarżyński, Piotr Henryk Med Sci Monit Clinical Research BACKGROUND: Auditory brainstem response (ABR) potential is important for audiological diagnosis, reflecting the integrity of the structures of the auditory system up to the brainstem. The click stimulus is the best known and is most used in clinical practice. However, different devices and examiners may yield distinct results, and each institution tends to use its own parameters. We aimed to analyze the latency values of wave I, III, V, and interpeak intervals I–III, III–V, I–V values obtained in assessing ABR using a new device. MATERIAL/METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study of 73 participants with normal hearing thresholds and no hearing problems. All underwent basic audiological (air and bone conduction, Speech Recognition Threshold, Speech Recognition Index, acoustic reflex, and tympanometry) and electrophysiological evaluation (ABR assessment). RESULTS: Absolute latency and interpeak values from ABR showed earlier responses in women, faster than international standards suggest. The responses were similar to other studies carried out previously, with the exception of wave I values, which were a little earlier in females. CONCLUSIONS: We assessed normative data from measurement of latency values of wave I, III, V, and interpeak intervals I–III, III–V, and I–V applying 2 standard deviations in the assessment of ABR using the new Neuro-Audio/ABR device created by Neurosoft. International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2022-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9595029/ /pubmed/36262029 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.937847 Text en © Med Sci Monit, 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This work is licensed under Creative Common Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) )
spellingShingle Clinical Research
Sanfins, Milaine Dominici
Colella-Santos, Maria Francisca
Ferrazoli, Natalia
Rezende, Adriano
Donadon, Caroline
Gos, Elżbieta
Skarżyński, Piotr Henryk
Latency and Interpeak Interval Values of Auditory Brainstem Response in 73 Individuals with Normal Hearing
title Latency and Interpeak Interval Values of Auditory Brainstem Response in 73 Individuals with Normal Hearing
title_full Latency and Interpeak Interval Values of Auditory Brainstem Response in 73 Individuals with Normal Hearing
title_fullStr Latency and Interpeak Interval Values of Auditory Brainstem Response in 73 Individuals with Normal Hearing
title_full_unstemmed Latency and Interpeak Interval Values of Auditory Brainstem Response in 73 Individuals with Normal Hearing
title_short Latency and Interpeak Interval Values of Auditory Brainstem Response in 73 Individuals with Normal Hearing
title_sort latency and interpeak interval values of auditory brainstem response in 73 individuals with normal hearing
topic Clinical Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9595029/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36262029
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.937847
work_keys_str_mv AT sanfinsmilainedominici latencyandinterpeakintervalvaluesofauditorybrainstemresponsein73individualswithnormalhearing
AT colellasantosmariafrancisca latencyandinterpeakintervalvaluesofauditorybrainstemresponsein73individualswithnormalhearing
AT ferrazolinatalia latencyandinterpeakintervalvaluesofauditorybrainstemresponsein73individualswithnormalhearing
AT rezendeadriano latencyandinterpeakintervalvaluesofauditorybrainstemresponsein73individualswithnormalhearing
AT donadoncaroline latencyandinterpeakintervalvaluesofauditorybrainstemresponsein73individualswithnormalhearing
AT goselzbieta latencyandinterpeakintervalvaluesofauditorybrainstemresponsein73individualswithnormalhearing
AT skarzynskipiotrhenryk latencyandinterpeakintervalvaluesofauditorybrainstemresponsein73individualswithnormalhearing