Cargando…
Latency and Interpeak Interval Values of Auditory Brainstem Response in 73 Individuals with Normal Hearing
BACKGROUND: Auditory brainstem response (ABR) potential is important for audiological diagnosis, reflecting the integrity of the structures of the auditory system up to the brainstem. The click stimulus is the best known and is most used in clinical practice. However, different devices and examiners...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
International Scientific Literature, Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9595029/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36262029 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.937847 |
_version_ | 1784815554623700992 |
---|---|
author | Sanfins, Milaine Dominici Colella-Santos, Maria Francisca Ferrazoli, Natalia Rezende, Adriano Donadon, Caroline Gos, Elżbieta Skarżyński, Piotr Henryk |
author_facet | Sanfins, Milaine Dominici Colella-Santos, Maria Francisca Ferrazoli, Natalia Rezende, Adriano Donadon, Caroline Gos, Elżbieta Skarżyński, Piotr Henryk |
author_sort | Sanfins, Milaine Dominici |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Auditory brainstem response (ABR) potential is important for audiological diagnosis, reflecting the integrity of the structures of the auditory system up to the brainstem. The click stimulus is the best known and is most used in clinical practice. However, different devices and examiners may yield distinct results, and each institution tends to use its own parameters. We aimed to analyze the latency values of wave I, III, V, and interpeak intervals I–III, III–V, I–V values obtained in assessing ABR using a new device. MATERIAL/METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study of 73 participants with normal hearing thresholds and no hearing problems. All underwent basic audiological (air and bone conduction, Speech Recognition Threshold, Speech Recognition Index, acoustic reflex, and tympanometry) and electrophysiological evaluation (ABR assessment). RESULTS: Absolute latency and interpeak values from ABR showed earlier responses in women, faster than international standards suggest. The responses were similar to other studies carried out previously, with the exception of wave I values, which were a little earlier in females. CONCLUSIONS: We assessed normative data from measurement of latency values of wave I, III, V, and interpeak intervals I–III, III–V, and I–V applying 2 standard deviations in the assessment of ABR using the new Neuro-Audio/ABR device created by Neurosoft. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9595029 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | International Scientific Literature, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95950292022-11-02 Latency and Interpeak Interval Values of Auditory Brainstem Response in 73 Individuals with Normal Hearing Sanfins, Milaine Dominici Colella-Santos, Maria Francisca Ferrazoli, Natalia Rezende, Adriano Donadon, Caroline Gos, Elżbieta Skarżyński, Piotr Henryk Med Sci Monit Clinical Research BACKGROUND: Auditory brainstem response (ABR) potential is important for audiological diagnosis, reflecting the integrity of the structures of the auditory system up to the brainstem. The click stimulus is the best known and is most used in clinical practice. However, different devices and examiners may yield distinct results, and each institution tends to use its own parameters. We aimed to analyze the latency values of wave I, III, V, and interpeak intervals I–III, III–V, I–V values obtained in assessing ABR using a new device. MATERIAL/METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study of 73 participants with normal hearing thresholds and no hearing problems. All underwent basic audiological (air and bone conduction, Speech Recognition Threshold, Speech Recognition Index, acoustic reflex, and tympanometry) and electrophysiological evaluation (ABR assessment). RESULTS: Absolute latency and interpeak values from ABR showed earlier responses in women, faster than international standards suggest. The responses were similar to other studies carried out previously, with the exception of wave I values, which were a little earlier in females. CONCLUSIONS: We assessed normative data from measurement of latency values of wave I, III, V, and interpeak intervals I–III, III–V, and I–V applying 2 standard deviations in the assessment of ABR using the new Neuro-Audio/ABR device created by Neurosoft. International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2022-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9595029/ /pubmed/36262029 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.937847 Text en © Med Sci Monit, 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This work is licensed under Creative Common Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ) |
spellingShingle | Clinical Research Sanfins, Milaine Dominici Colella-Santos, Maria Francisca Ferrazoli, Natalia Rezende, Adriano Donadon, Caroline Gos, Elżbieta Skarżyński, Piotr Henryk Latency and Interpeak Interval Values of Auditory Brainstem Response in 73 Individuals with Normal Hearing |
title | Latency and Interpeak Interval Values of Auditory Brainstem Response in 73 Individuals with Normal Hearing |
title_full | Latency and Interpeak Interval Values of Auditory Brainstem Response in 73 Individuals with Normal Hearing |
title_fullStr | Latency and Interpeak Interval Values of Auditory Brainstem Response in 73 Individuals with Normal Hearing |
title_full_unstemmed | Latency and Interpeak Interval Values of Auditory Brainstem Response in 73 Individuals with Normal Hearing |
title_short | Latency and Interpeak Interval Values of Auditory Brainstem Response in 73 Individuals with Normal Hearing |
title_sort | latency and interpeak interval values of auditory brainstem response in 73 individuals with normal hearing |
topic | Clinical Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9595029/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36262029 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.937847 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sanfinsmilainedominici latencyandinterpeakintervalvaluesofauditorybrainstemresponsein73individualswithnormalhearing AT colellasantosmariafrancisca latencyandinterpeakintervalvaluesofauditorybrainstemresponsein73individualswithnormalhearing AT ferrazolinatalia latencyandinterpeakintervalvaluesofauditorybrainstemresponsein73individualswithnormalhearing AT rezendeadriano latencyandinterpeakintervalvaluesofauditorybrainstemresponsein73individualswithnormalhearing AT donadoncaroline latencyandinterpeakintervalvaluesofauditorybrainstemresponsein73individualswithnormalhearing AT goselzbieta latencyandinterpeakintervalvaluesofauditorybrainstemresponsein73individualswithnormalhearing AT skarzynskipiotrhenryk latencyandinterpeakintervalvaluesofauditorybrainstemresponsein73individualswithnormalhearing |