Cargando…
Self-Reported COVID-19 Infections and Social Mixing Behavior at Oncology Meetings
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S): The COVID-19 pandemic largely suspended conventional in-person scientific meetings because of the risk of disease spread. In the era of vaccination and social distancing practices, meetings have slowly begun to return to in-person formats. We surveyed attendees and potential at...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Published by Elsevier Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9595452/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.07.1432 |
_version_ | 1784815653248565248 |
---|---|
author | Talcott, W.J. Chen, K. Peters, G.W. Reddy, K.K. Weintraub, S.M. Mougalian, S. Adelson, K. Evans, S.B. |
author_facet | Talcott, W.J. Chen, K. Peters, G.W. Reddy, K.K. Weintraub, S.M. Mougalian, S. Adelson, K. Evans, S.B. |
author_sort | Talcott, W.J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S): The COVID-19 pandemic largely suspended conventional in-person scientific meetings because of the risk of disease spread. In the era of vaccination and social distancing practices, meetings have slowly begun to return to in-person formats. We surveyed attendees and potential attendees of two United States oncology meetings to identify rates of mixing behavior and the subsequent rate of self-reported COVID-19 infection. MATERIALS/METHODS: We collected reported social mixing behavior and COVID-19 positivity of actual and potential in-person oncology meeting attendees of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Quality Care Symposium in Boston, Massachusetts on September 24-25, 2021, and the American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) Annual Meeting in Chicago, Illinois on October 24-27, 2021 via survey. Participants were identified through publicly available meeting materials and targeted via email when possible. Recruitment was also conducted through Twitter and a radiation oncology newsletter, as well as an anonymous link made available to emailed recruits, with sharing encouraged. In-person respondents to the later ASTRO survey who had attended the ASCO meeting were excluded from the analysis. Statistical significance was determined using Fisher's exact test for rates of COVID-19 positivity and the chi-squared statistic for differences in group characteristics, with a cutoff for statistical significance p<0.05. RESULTS: Response rates from attendees with publicly available emails were 27.4% for the ASCO meeting and 14.3% for the ASTRO meeting. The ASCO survey produced 94 responses, with 48 responding as in-person attendees. The ASTRO survey produced 370 responses, with 267 responding as in-person attendees. Across both meetings, 3 of 308 (1.0%) of in-person attendees versus 2 of 141 (1.4%) of non-attendees tested positive for COVID-19 (p=0.65). Among in-person attendees, there were similar low COVID-19 positivity rates among those spending more (>20) vs less (≤20) hours attending live sessions (2.2% vs 0%, p=0.25) and between those who went to indoor social events vs those who did not during the meeting periods (0.8% vs 1.9%, p=0.44). Attendees largely felt that they would feel comfortable attending additional in-person meetings after experiencing the ASCO (87.5%) or ASTRO (91.9%) meetings and that mask compliance was good or excellent at the ASCO (100%) and ASTRO (94.6%) meetings. CONCLUSION: This study indicates that in-person meetings do not seem to be contributing to high rates of new COVID-19 infections in the setting of mask mandates, vaccine mandates, and decreased room capacity allowances. The rate of self-reported COVID-19 infection of both in-person attendees and non-attendees was very low and the meetings were successful at creating an environment where participants felt safe. These findings support the possibility of a path forward for at least partially in-person conferences as new variants emerge and COVID-19 becomes endemic. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9595452 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Published by Elsevier Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95954522022-10-25 Self-Reported COVID-19 Infections and Social Mixing Behavior at Oncology Meetings Talcott, W.J. Chen, K. Peters, G.W. Reddy, K.K. Weintraub, S.M. Mougalian, S. Adelson, K. Evans, S.B. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2758 PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S): The COVID-19 pandemic largely suspended conventional in-person scientific meetings because of the risk of disease spread. In the era of vaccination and social distancing practices, meetings have slowly begun to return to in-person formats. We surveyed attendees and potential attendees of two United States oncology meetings to identify rates of mixing behavior and the subsequent rate of self-reported COVID-19 infection. MATERIALS/METHODS: We collected reported social mixing behavior and COVID-19 positivity of actual and potential in-person oncology meeting attendees of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Quality Care Symposium in Boston, Massachusetts on September 24-25, 2021, and the American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) Annual Meeting in Chicago, Illinois on October 24-27, 2021 via survey. Participants were identified through publicly available meeting materials and targeted via email when possible. Recruitment was also conducted through Twitter and a radiation oncology newsletter, as well as an anonymous link made available to emailed recruits, with sharing encouraged. In-person respondents to the later ASTRO survey who had attended the ASCO meeting were excluded from the analysis. Statistical significance was determined using Fisher's exact test for rates of COVID-19 positivity and the chi-squared statistic for differences in group characteristics, with a cutoff for statistical significance p<0.05. RESULTS: Response rates from attendees with publicly available emails were 27.4% for the ASCO meeting and 14.3% for the ASTRO meeting. The ASCO survey produced 94 responses, with 48 responding as in-person attendees. The ASTRO survey produced 370 responses, with 267 responding as in-person attendees. Across both meetings, 3 of 308 (1.0%) of in-person attendees versus 2 of 141 (1.4%) of non-attendees tested positive for COVID-19 (p=0.65). Among in-person attendees, there were similar low COVID-19 positivity rates among those spending more (>20) vs less (≤20) hours attending live sessions (2.2% vs 0%, p=0.25) and between those who went to indoor social events vs those who did not during the meeting periods (0.8% vs 1.9%, p=0.44). Attendees largely felt that they would feel comfortable attending additional in-person meetings after experiencing the ASCO (87.5%) or ASTRO (91.9%) meetings and that mask compliance was good or excellent at the ASCO (100%) and ASTRO (94.6%) meetings. CONCLUSION: This study indicates that in-person meetings do not seem to be contributing to high rates of new COVID-19 infections in the setting of mask mandates, vaccine mandates, and decreased room capacity allowances. The rate of self-reported COVID-19 infection of both in-person attendees and non-attendees was very low and the meetings were successful at creating an environment where participants felt safe. These findings support the possibility of a path forward for at least partially in-person conferences as new variants emerge and COVID-19 becomes endemic. Published by Elsevier Inc. 2022-11-01 2022-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9595452/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.07.1432 Text en Copyright © 2022 Published by Elsevier Inc. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | 2758 Talcott, W.J. Chen, K. Peters, G.W. Reddy, K.K. Weintraub, S.M. Mougalian, S. Adelson, K. Evans, S.B. Self-Reported COVID-19 Infections and Social Mixing Behavior at Oncology Meetings |
title | Self-Reported COVID-19 Infections and Social Mixing Behavior at Oncology Meetings |
title_full | Self-Reported COVID-19 Infections and Social Mixing Behavior at Oncology Meetings |
title_fullStr | Self-Reported COVID-19 Infections and Social Mixing Behavior at Oncology Meetings |
title_full_unstemmed | Self-Reported COVID-19 Infections and Social Mixing Behavior at Oncology Meetings |
title_short | Self-Reported COVID-19 Infections and Social Mixing Behavior at Oncology Meetings |
title_sort | self-reported covid-19 infections and social mixing behavior at oncology meetings |
topic | 2758 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9595452/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.07.1432 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT talcottwj selfreportedcovid19infectionsandsocialmixingbehavioratoncologymeetings AT chenk selfreportedcovid19infectionsandsocialmixingbehavioratoncologymeetings AT petersgw selfreportedcovid19infectionsandsocialmixingbehavioratoncologymeetings AT reddykk selfreportedcovid19infectionsandsocialmixingbehavioratoncologymeetings AT weintraubsm selfreportedcovid19infectionsandsocialmixingbehavioratoncologymeetings AT mougalians selfreportedcovid19infectionsandsocialmixingbehavioratoncologymeetings AT adelsonk selfreportedcovid19infectionsandsocialmixingbehavioratoncologymeetings AT evanssb selfreportedcovid19infectionsandsocialmixingbehavioratoncologymeetings |