Cargando…

Self-Reported COVID-19 Infections and Social Mixing Behavior at Oncology Meetings

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S): The COVID-19 pandemic largely suspended conventional in-person scientific meetings because of the risk of disease spread. In the era of vaccination and social distancing practices, meetings have slowly begun to return to in-person formats. We surveyed attendees and potential at...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Talcott, W.J., Chen, K., Peters, G.W., Reddy, K.K., Weintraub, S.M., Mougalian, S., Adelson, K., Evans, S.B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Published by Elsevier Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9595452/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.07.1432
_version_ 1784815653248565248
author Talcott, W.J.
Chen, K.
Peters, G.W.
Reddy, K.K.
Weintraub, S.M.
Mougalian, S.
Adelson, K.
Evans, S.B.
author_facet Talcott, W.J.
Chen, K.
Peters, G.W.
Reddy, K.K.
Weintraub, S.M.
Mougalian, S.
Adelson, K.
Evans, S.B.
author_sort Talcott, W.J.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S): The COVID-19 pandemic largely suspended conventional in-person scientific meetings because of the risk of disease spread. In the era of vaccination and social distancing practices, meetings have slowly begun to return to in-person formats. We surveyed attendees and potential attendees of two United States oncology meetings to identify rates of mixing behavior and the subsequent rate of self-reported COVID-19 infection. MATERIALS/METHODS: We collected reported social mixing behavior and COVID-19 positivity of actual and potential in-person oncology meeting attendees of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Quality Care Symposium in Boston, Massachusetts on September 24-25, 2021, and the American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) Annual Meeting in Chicago, Illinois on October 24-27, 2021 via survey. Participants were identified through publicly available meeting materials and targeted via email when possible. Recruitment was also conducted through Twitter and a radiation oncology newsletter, as well as an anonymous link made available to emailed recruits, with sharing encouraged. In-person respondents to the later ASTRO survey who had attended the ASCO meeting were excluded from the analysis. Statistical significance was determined using Fisher's exact test for rates of COVID-19 positivity and the chi-squared statistic for differences in group characteristics, with a cutoff for statistical significance p<0.05. RESULTS: Response rates from attendees with publicly available emails were 27.4% for the ASCO meeting and 14.3% for the ASTRO meeting. The ASCO survey produced 94 responses, with 48 responding as in-person attendees. The ASTRO survey produced 370 responses, with 267 responding as in-person attendees. Across both meetings, 3 of 308 (1.0%) of in-person attendees versus 2 of 141 (1.4%) of non-attendees tested positive for COVID-19 (p=0.65). Among in-person attendees, there were similar low COVID-19 positivity rates among those spending more (>20) vs less (≤20) hours attending live sessions (2.2% vs 0%, p=0.25) and between those who went to indoor social events vs those who did not during the meeting periods (0.8% vs 1.9%, p=0.44). Attendees largely felt that they would feel comfortable attending additional in-person meetings after experiencing the ASCO (87.5%) or ASTRO (91.9%) meetings and that mask compliance was good or excellent at the ASCO (100%) and ASTRO (94.6%) meetings. CONCLUSION: This study indicates that in-person meetings do not seem to be contributing to high rates of new COVID-19 infections in the setting of mask mandates, vaccine mandates, and decreased room capacity allowances. The rate of self-reported COVID-19 infection of both in-person attendees and non-attendees was very low and the meetings were successful at creating an environment where participants felt safe. These findings support the possibility of a path forward for at least partially in-person conferences as new variants emerge and COVID-19 becomes endemic.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9595452
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Published by Elsevier Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95954522022-10-25 Self-Reported COVID-19 Infections and Social Mixing Behavior at Oncology Meetings Talcott, W.J. Chen, K. Peters, G.W. Reddy, K.K. Weintraub, S.M. Mougalian, S. Adelson, K. Evans, S.B. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2758 PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S): The COVID-19 pandemic largely suspended conventional in-person scientific meetings because of the risk of disease spread. In the era of vaccination and social distancing practices, meetings have slowly begun to return to in-person formats. We surveyed attendees and potential attendees of two United States oncology meetings to identify rates of mixing behavior and the subsequent rate of self-reported COVID-19 infection. MATERIALS/METHODS: We collected reported social mixing behavior and COVID-19 positivity of actual and potential in-person oncology meeting attendees of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Quality Care Symposium in Boston, Massachusetts on September 24-25, 2021, and the American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) Annual Meeting in Chicago, Illinois on October 24-27, 2021 via survey. Participants were identified through publicly available meeting materials and targeted via email when possible. Recruitment was also conducted through Twitter and a radiation oncology newsletter, as well as an anonymous link made available to emailed recruits, with sharing encouraged. In-person respondents to the later ASTRO survey who had attended the ASCO meeting were excluded from the analysis. Statistical significance was determined using Fisher's exact test for rates of COVID-19 positivity and the chi-squared statistic for differences in group characteristics, with a cutoff for statistical significance p<0.05. RESULTS: Response rates from attendees with publicly available emails were 27.4% for the ASCO meeting and 14.3% for the ASTRO meeting. The ASCO survey produced 94 responses, with 48 responding as in-person attendees. The ASTRO survey produced 370 responses, with 267 responding as in-person attendees. Across both meetings, 3 of 308 (1.0%) of in-person attendees versus 2 of 141 (1.4%) of non-attendees tested positive for COVID-19 (p=0.65). Among in-person attendees, there were similar low COVID-19 positivity rates among those spending more (>20) vs less (≤20) hours attending live sessions (2.2% vs 0%, p=0.25) and between those who went to indoor social events vs those who did not during the meeting periods (0.8% vs 1.9%, p=0.44). Attendees largely felt that they would feel comfortable attending additional in-person meetings after experiencing the ASCO (87.5%) or ASTRO (91.9%) meetings and that mask compliance was good or excellent at the ASCO (100%) and ASTRO (94.6%) meetings. CONCLUSION: This study indicates that in-person meetings do not seem to be contributing to high rates of new COVID-19 infections in the setting of mask mandates, vaccine mandates, and decreased room capacity allowances. The rate of self-reported COVID-19 infection of both in-person attendees and non-attendees was very low and the meetings were successful at creating an environment where participants felt safe. These findings support the possibility of a path forward for at least partially in-person conferences as new variants emerge and COVID-19 becomes endemic. Published by Elsevier Inc. 2022-11-01 2022-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9595452/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.07.1432 Text en Copyright © 2022 Published by Elsevier Inc. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle 2758
Talcott, W.J.
Chen, K.
Peters, G.W.
Reddy, K.K.
Weintraub, S.M.
Mougalian, S.
Adelson, K.
Evans, S.B.
Self-Reported COVID-19 Infections and Social Mixing Behavior at Oncology Meetings
title Self-Reported COVID-19 Infections and Social Mixing Behavior at Oncology Meetings
title_full Self-Reported COVID-19 Infections and Social Mixing Behavior at Oncology Meetings
title_fullStr Self-Reported COVID-19 Infections and Social Mixing Behavior at Oncology Meetings
title_full_unstemmed Self-Reported COVID-19 Infections and Social Mixing Behavior at Oncology Meetings
title_short Self-Reported COVID-19 Infections and Social Mixing Behavior at Oncology Meetings
title_sort self-reported covid-19 infections and social mixing behavior at oncology meetings
topic 2758
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9595452/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.07.1432
work_keys_str_mv AT talcottwj selfreportedcovid19infectionsandsocialmixingbehavioratoncologymeetings
AT chenk selfreportedcovid19infectionsandsocialmixingbehavioratoncologymeetings
AT petersgw selfreportedcovid19infectionsandsocialmixingbehavioratoncologymeetings
AT reddykk selfreportedcovid19infectionsandsocialmixingbehavioratoncologymeetings
AT weintraubsm selfreportedcovid19infectionsandsocialmixingbehavioratoncologymeetings
AT mougalians selfreportedcovid19infectionsandsocialmixingbehavioratoncologymeetings
AT adelsonk selfreportedcovid19infectionsandsocialmixingbehavioratoncologymeetings
AT evanssb selfreportedcovid19infectionsandsocialmixingbehavioratoncologymeetings