Cargando…

Strategies for culturally safe research with Native American communities: an integrative review

BACKGROUND: A history of unethical research and deficit-based paradigms have contributed to profound mistrust of research among Native Americans, serving as an important call to action. Lack of cultural safety in research with Native Americans limits integration of cultural and contextual knowledge...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brockie, Teresa N., Hill, Kyle, Davidson, Patricia M., Decker, Ellie, Krienke, Lydia Koh, Nelson, Katie E., Nicholson, Natalie, Werk, Alicia M., Wilson, Deborah, Him, Deana Around
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9596189/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34907854
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10376178.2021.2015414
_version_ 1784815814304595968
author Brockie, Teresa N.
Hill, Kyle
Davidson, Patricia M.
Decker, Ellie
Krienke, Lydia Koh
Nelson, Katie E.
Nicholson, Natalie
Werk, Alicia M.
Wilson, Deborah
Him, Deana Around
author_facet Brockie, Teresa N.
Hill, Kyle
Davidson, Patricia M.
Decker, Ellie
Krienke, Lydia Koh
Nelson, Katie E.
Nicholson, Natalie
Werk, Alicia M.
Wilson, Deborah
Him, Deana Around
author_sort Brockie, Teresa N.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A history of unethical research and deficit-based paradigms have contributed to profound mistrust of research among Native Americans, serving as an important call to action. Lack of cultural safety in research with Native Americans limits integration of cultural and contextual knowledge that is valuable for understanding challenges and making progress toward sustainable change. AIM: To identify strategies for promoting cultural safety, accountability, and sustainability in research with Native American communities. METHOD: Using an integrative review approach, three distinct processes were carried out: (1) appraisal of peer-reviewed literature (Scopus, PubMed, and ProQuest), (2) review of grey literature (e.g. policy documents and guidelines), and (3) synthesis of recommendations for promoting cultural safety. RESULTS: A total of 378 articles were screened for inclusion, with 55 peer-reviewed and grey literature articles extracted for full review. Recommendations from included articles were synthesised into strategies aligned with eight thematic areas for improving cultural safety in research with Native American communities. CONCLUSIONS: Research aiming to understand, respect, and acknowledge tribal sovereignty, address historical trauma, and endorse Indigenous methods is essential. Culturally appropriate, community-based and -engaged research collaborations with Native American communities can signal a reparative effort, re-establish trust, and inform pragmatic solutions. Rigorous research led by Native American people is critical to address common and complex health challenges faced by Native American communities. IMPACT STATEMENT: Respect and rigorous methods ensure cultural safety, accountability, and sustainability in research with Native Americans.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9596189
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95961892022-10-25 Strategies for culturally safe research with Native American communities: an integrative review Brockie, Teresa N. Hill, Kyle Davidson, Patricia M. Decker, Ellie Krienke, Lydia Koh Nelson, Katie E. Nicholson, Natalie Werk, Alicia M. Wilson, Deborah Him, Deana Around Contemp Nurse Article BACKGROUND: A history of unethical research and deficit-based paradigms have contributed to profound mistrust of research among Native Americans, serving as an important call to action. Lack of cultural safety in research with Native Americans limits integration of cultural and contextual knowledge that is valuable for understanding challenges and making progress toward sustainable change. AIM: To identify strategies for promoting cultural safety, accountability, and sustainability in research with Native American communities. METHOD: Using an integrative review approach, three distinct processes were carried out: (1) appraisal of peer-reviewed literature (Scopus, PubMed, and ProQuest), (2) review of grey literature (e.g. policy documents and guidelines), and (3) synthesis of recommendations for promoting cultural safety. RESULTS: A total of 378 articles were screened for inclusion, with 55 peer-reviewed and grey literature articles extracted for full review. Recommendations from included articles were synthesised into strategies aligned with eight thematic areas for improving cultural safety in research with Native American communities. CONCLUSIONS: Research aiming to understand, respect, and acknowledge tribal sovereignty, address historical trauma, and endorse Indigenous methods is essential. Culturally appropriate, community-based and -engaged research collaborations with Native American communities can signal a reparative effort, re-establish trust, and inform pragmatic solutions. Rigorous research led by Native American people is critical to address common and complex health challenges faced by Native American communities. IMPACT STATEMENT: Respect and rigorous methods ensure cultural safety, accountability, and sustainability in research with Native Americans. 2022-02 2022-01-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9596189/ /pubmed/34907854 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10376178.2021.2015414 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way.
spellingShingle Article
Brockie, Teresa N.
Hill, Kyle
Davidson, Patricia M.
Decker, Ellie
Krienke, Lydia Koh
Nelson, Katie E.
Nicholson, Natalie
Werk, Alicia M.
Wilson, Deborah
Him, Deana Around
Strategies for culturally safe research with Native American communities: an integrative review
title Strategies for culturally safe research with Native American communities: an integrative review
title_full Strategies for culturally safe research with Native American communities: an integrative review
title_fullStr Strategies for culturally safe research with Native American communities: an integrative review
title_full_unstemmed Strategies for culturally safe research with Native American communities: an integrative review
title_short Strategies for culturally safe research with Native American communities: an integrative review
title_sort strategies for culturally safe research with native american communities: an integrative review
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9596189/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34907854
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10376178.2021.2015414
work_keys_str_mv AT brockieteresan strategiesforculturallysaferesearchwithnativeamericancommunitiesanintegrativereview
AT hillkyle strategiesforculturallysaferesearchwithnativeamericancommunitiesanintegrativereview
AT davidsonpatriciam strategiesforculturallysaferesearchwithnativeamericancommunitiesanintegrativereview
AT deckerellie strategiesforculturallysaferesearchwithnativeamericancommunitiesanintegrativereview
AT krienkelydiakoh strategiesforculturallysaferesearchwithnativeamericancommunitiesanintegrativereview
AT nelsonkatiee strategiesforculturallysaferesearchwithnativeamericancommunitiesanintegrativereview
AT nicholsonnatalie strategiesforculturallysaferesearchwithnativeamericancommunitiesanintegrativereview
AT werkaliciam strategiesforculturallysaferesearchwithnativeamericancommunitiesanintegrativereview
AT wilsondeborah strategiesforculturallysaferesearchwithnativeamericancommunitiesanintegrativereview
AT himdeanaaround strategiesforculturallysaferesearchwithnativeamericancommunitiesanintegrativereview