Cargando…

Efficacy and Safety of 0.1% Cyclosporine versus 2% Cyclosporine in the Treatment of Severe Vernal Keratoconjunctivitis in Children

INTRODUCTION: Vernal keratoconjunctivitis (VKC) is an inflammatory condition in children that can cause severe eye complications. Treatment is based on corticosteroid therapy during flare-ups, then antihistamines and cyclosporine in calmer periods. The dosage and posology of cyclosporine are subject...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bourcier, Tristan, Dory, Anne, Dormegny, Lea, Alcazar, Joffrey, Gaucher, David, Sauer, Arnaud
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9596278/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36304991
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S370414
_version_ 1784815836059402240
author Bourcier, Tristan
Dory, Anne
Dormegny, Lea
Alcazar, Joffrey
Gaucher, David
Sauer, Arnaud
author_facet Bourcier, Tristan
Dory, Anne
Dormegny, Lea
Alcazar, Joffrey
Gaucher, David
Sauer, Arnaud
author_sort Bourcier, Tristan
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Vernal keratoconjunctivitis (VKC) is an inflammatory condition in children that can cause severe eye complications. Treatment is based on corticosteroid therapy during flare-ups, then antihistamines and cyclosporine in calmer periods. The dosage and posology of cyclosporine are subject to debate. METHODS: The aim of the study is to compare the evolution in symptomatic and clinical scores, and need for topical corticosteroid treatment in a population of children with severe VKC treated with two dosages of cyclosporine treatment (0.1% and 2%). Data were compiled on inclusion then every three months from March, with a total follow-up duration of 12 months. Data concerning patient evolutions and complications were collected for the two treatment groups. RESULTS: The mean age of the 46 children was 8.8 ±2.4 years with age at onset of symptoms of 5.1 ± 0.9 years. The cohort was predominantly (65%) male. Corticosteroid dependence on inclusion was present in 52% of the children included. A significant improvement in the various symptomatic and clinical scores was observed following treatment with cyclosporine (0.1% and 2%). Use of topical corticosteroid treatment reduced from 19 drops per month on inclusion to 4 drops per month at 12 months. Safety was comparable for the two groups. CONCLUSION: Treatments with cyclosporine 0.1% and 2% lead to a favourable evolution in clinical and symptomatic scores and reduced corticosteroid use. Cyclosporine 0.1% is an interesting alternative to the 2% dosage, particularly due to its availability and ease of handling.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9596278
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95962782022-10-26 Efficacy and Safety of 0.1% Cyclosporine versus 2% Cyclosporine in the Treatment of Severe Vernal Keratoconjunctivitis in Children Bourcier, Tristan Dory, Anne Dormegny, Lea Alcazar, Joffrey Gaucher, David Sauer, Arnaud Clin Ophthalmol Original Research INTRODUCTION: Vernal keratoconjunctivitis (VKC) is an inflammatory condition in children that can cause severe eye complications. Treatment is based on corticosteroid therapy during flare-ups, then antihistamines and cyclosporine in calmer periods. The dosage and posology of cyclosporine are subject to debate. METHODS: The aim of the study is to compare the evolution in symptomatic and clinical scores, and need for topical corticosteroid treatment in a population of children with severe VKC treated with two dosages of cyclosporine treatment (0.1% and 2%). Data were compiled on inclusion then every three months from March, with a total follow-up duration of 12 months. Data concerning patient evolutions and complications were collected for the two treatment groups. RESULTS: The mean age of the 46 children was 8.8 ±2.4 years with age at onset of symptoms of 5.1 ± 0.9 years. The cohort was predominantly (65%) male. Corticosteroid dependence on inclusion was present in 52% of the children included. A significant improvement in the various symptomatic and clinical scores was observed following treatment with cyclosporine (0.1% and 2%). Use of topical corticosteroid treatment reduced from 19 drops per month on inclusion to 4 drops per month at 12 months. Safety was comparable for the two groups. CONCLUSION: Treatments with cyclosporine 0.1% and 2% lead to a favourable evolution in clinical and symptomatic scores and reduced corticosteroid use. Cyclosporine 0.1% is an interesting alternative to the 2% dosage, particularly due to its availability and ease of handling. Dove 2022-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9596278/ /pubmed/36304991 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S370414 Text en © 2022 Bourcier et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Bourcier, Tristan
Dory, Anne
Dormegny, Lea
Alcazar, Joffrey
Gaucher, David
Sauer, Arnaud
Efficacy and Safety of 0.1% Cyclosporine versus 2% Cyclosporine in the Treatment of Severe Vernal Keratoconjunctivitis in Children
title Efficacy and Safety of 0.1% Cyclosporine versus 2% Cyclosporine in the Treatment of Severe Vernal Keratoconjunctivitis in Children
title_full Efficacy and Safety of 0.1% Cyclosporine versus 2% Cyclosporine in the Treatment of Severe Vernal Keratoconjunctivitis in Children
title_fullStr Efficacy and Safety of 0.1% Cyclosporine versus 2% Cyclosporine in the Treatment of Severe Vernal Keratoconjunctivitis in Children
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and Safety of 0.1% Cyclosporine versus 2% Cyclosporine in the Treatment of Severe Vernal Keratoconjunctivitis in Children
title_short Efficacy and Safety of 0.1% Cyclosporine versus 2% Cyclosporine in the Treatment of Severe Vernal Keratoconjunctivitis in Children
title_sort efficacy and safety of 0.1% cyclosporine versus 2% cyclosporine in the treatment of severe vernal keratoconjunctivitis in children
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9596278/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36304991
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S370414
work_keys_str_mv AT bourciertristan efficacyandsafetyof01cyclosporineversus2cyclosporineinthetreatmentofseverevernalkeratoconjunctivitisinchildren
AT doryanne efficacyandsafetyof01cyclosporineversus2cyclosporineinthetreatmentofseverevernalkeratoconjunctivitisinchildren
AT dormegnylea efficacyandsafetyof01cyclosporineversus2cyclosporineinthetreatmentofseverevernalkeratoconjunctivitisinchildren
AT alcazarjoffrey efficacyandsafetyof01cyclosporineversus2cyclosporineinthetreatmentofseverevernalkeratoconjunctivitisinchildren
AT gaucherdavid efficacyandsafetyof01cyclosporineversus2cyclosporineinthetreatmentofseverevernalkeratoconjunctivitisinchildren
AT sauerarnaud efficacyandsafetyof01cyclosporineversus2cyclosporineinthetreatmentofseverevernalkeratoconjunctivitisinchildren