Cargando…
Robust automated prediction of the revised Vienna Classification in colonoscopy using deep learning: development and initial external validation
BACKGROUND: Improved optical diagnostic technology is needed that can be used by also outside expert centers. Hence, we developed an artificial intelligence (AI) system that automatically and robustly predicts the pathological diagnosis based on the revised Vienna Classification using standard colon...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Nature Singapore
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9596523/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35972582 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00535-022-01908-1 |
_version_ | 1784815890746834944 |
---|---|
author | Yamada, Masayoshi Shino, Ryosaku Kondo, Hiroko Yamada, Shigemi Takamaru, Hiroyuki Sakamoto, Taku Bhandari, Pradeep Imaoka, Hitoshi Kuchiba, Aya Shibata, Taro Saito, Yutaka Hamamoto, Ryuji |
author_facet | Yamada, Masayoshi Shino, Ryosaku Kondo, Hiroko Yamada, Shigemi Takamaru, Hiroyuki Sakamoto, Taku Bhandari, Pradeep Imaoka, Hitoshi Kuchiba, Aya Shibata, Taro Saito, Yutaka Hamamoto, Ryuji |
author_sort | Yamada, Masayoshi |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Improved optical diagnostic technology is needed that can be used by also outside expert centers. Hence, we developed an artificial intelligence (AI) system that automatically and robustly predicts the pathological diagnosis based on the revised Vienna Classification using standard colonoscopy images. METHODS: We prepared deep learning algorithms and colonoscopy images containing pathologically proven lesions (56,872 images, 6775 lesions). Four classifications were adopted: revised Vienna Classification category 1, 3, and 4/5 and normal images. The best algorithm—ResNet152—in the independent internal validation (14,048 images, 1718 lesions) was used for external validation (255 images, 128 lesions) based on neoplastic and non-neoplastic classification. Diagnostic performance of endoscopists was compared using a computer-assisted interpreting test. RESULTS: In the internal validation, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy for adenoma (category 3) of 84.6% (95% CI 83.5–85.6%), 99.7% (99.5–99.8%), 90.8% (89.9–91.7%), 89.2% (88.5–99.0%), and 89.8% (89.3–90.4%), respectively. In the external validation, ResNet152’s sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy for neoplastic lesions were 88.3% (82.6–94.1%), 90.3% (83.0–97.7%), 94.6% (90.5–98.8%), 80.0% (70.6–89.4%), and 89.0% (84.5–93.6%), respectively. This diagnostic performance was superior to that of expert endoscopists. Area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve was 0.903 (0.860–0.946). CONCLUSIONS: The developed AI system can help non-expert endoscopists make differential diagnoses of colorectal neoplasia on par with expert endoscopists during colonoscopy. (229/250 words). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00535-022-01908-1. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9596523 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Nature Singapore |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95965232022-10-27 Robust automated prediction of the revised Vienna Classification in colonoscopy using deep learning: development and initial external validation Yamada, Masayoshi Shino, Ryosaku Kondo, Hiroko Yamada, Shigemi Takamaru, Hiroyuki Sakamoto, Taku Bhandari, Pradeep Imaoka, Hitoshi Kuchiba, Aya Shibata, Taro Saito, Yutaka Hamamoto, Ryuji J Gastroenterol Original Article—Alimentary Tract BACKGROUND: Improved optical diagnostic technology is needed that can be used by also outside expert centers. Hence, we developed an artificial intelligence (AI) system that automatically and robustly predicts the pathological diagnosis based on the revised Vienna Classification using standard colonoscopy images. METHODS: We prepared deep learning algorithms and colonoscopy images containing pathologically proven lesions (56,872 images, 6775 lesions). Four classifications were adopted: revised Vienna Classification category 1, 3, and 4/5 and normal images. The best algorithm—ResNet152—in the independent internal validation (14,048 images, 1718 lesions) was used for external validation (255 images, 128 lesions) based on neoplastic and non-neoplastic classification. Diagnostic performance of endoscopists was compared using a computer-assisted interpreting test. RESULTS: In the internal validation, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy for adenoma (category 3) of 84.6% (95% CI 83.5–85.6%), 99.7% (99.5–99.8%), 90.8% (89.9–91.7%), 89.2% (88.5–99.0%), and 89.8% (89.3–90.4%), respectively. In the external validation, ResNet152’s sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy for neoplastic lesions were 88.3% (82.6–94.1%), 90.3% (83.0–97.7%), 94.6% (90.5–98.8%), 80.0% (70.6–89.4%), and 89.0% (84.5–93.6%), respectively. This diagnostic performance was superior to that of expert endoscopists. Area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve was 0.903 (0.860–0.946). CONCLUSIONS: The developed AI system can help non-expert endoscopists make differential diagnoses of colorectal neoplasia on par with expert endoscopists during colonoscopy. (229/250 words). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00535-022-01908-1. Springer Nature Singapore 2022-08-16 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9596523/ /pubmed/35972582 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00535-022-01908-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article—Alimentary Tract Yamada, Masayoshi Shino, Ryosaku Kondo, Hiroko Yamada, Shigemi Takamaru, Hiroyuki Sakamoto, Taku Bhandari, Pradeep Imaoka, Hitoshi Kuchiba, Aya Shibata, Taro Saito, Yutaka Hamamoto, Ryuji Robust automated prediction of the revised Vienna Classification in colonoscopy using deep learning: development and initial external validation |
title | Robust automated prediction of the revised Vienna Classification in colonoscopy using deep learning: development and initial external validation |
title_full | Robust automated prediction of the revised Vienna Classification in colonoscopy using deep learning: development and initial external validation |
title_fullStr | Robust automated prediction of the revised Vienna Classification in colonoscopy using deep learning: development and initial external validation |
title_full_unstemmed | Robust automated prediction of the revised Vienna Classification in colonoscopy using deep learning: development and initial external validation |
title_short | Robust automated prediction of the revised Vienna Classification in colonoscopy using deep learning: development and initial external validation |
title_sort | robust automated prediction of the revised vienna classification in colonoscopy using deep learning: development and initial external validation |
topic | Original Article—Alimentary Tract |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9596523/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35972582 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00535-022-01908-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yamadamasayoshi robustautomatedpredictionoftherevisedviennaclassificationincolonoscopyusingdeeplearningdevelopmentandinitialexternalvalidation AT shinoryosaku robustautomatedpredictionoftherevisedviennaclassificationincolonoscopyusingdeeplearningdevelopmentandinitialexternalvalidation AT kondohiroko robustautomatedpredictionoftherevisedviennaclassificationincolonoscopyusingdeeplearningdevelopmentandinitialexternalvalidation AT yamadashigemi robustautomatedpredictionoftherevisedviennaclassificationincolonoscopyusingdeeplearningdevelopmentandinitialexternalvalidation AT takamaruhiroyuki robustautomatedpredictionoftherevisedviennaclassificationincolonoscopyusingdeeplearningdevelopmentandinitialexternalvalidation AT sakamototaku robustautomatedpredictionoftherevisedviennaclassificationincolonoscopyusingdeeplearningdevelopmentandinitialexternalvalidation AT bhandaripradeep robustautomatedpredictionoftherevisedviennaclassificationincolonoscopyusingdeeplearningdevelopmentandinitialexternalvalidation AT imaokahitoshi robustautomatedpredictionoftherevisedviennaclassificationincolonoscopyusingdeeplearningdevelopmentandinitialexternalvalidation AT kuchibaaya robustautomatedpredictionoftherevisedviennaclassificationincolonoscopyusingdeeplearningdevelopmentandinitialexternalvalidation AT shibatataro robustautomatedpredictionoftherevisedviennaclassificationincolonoscopyusingdeeplearningdevelopmentandinitialexternalvalidation AT saitoyutaka robustautomatedpredictionoftherevisedviennaclassificationincolonoscopyusingdeeplearningdevelopmentandinitialexternalvalidation AT hamamotoryuji robustautomatedpredictionoftherevisedviennaclassificationincolonoscopyusingdeeplearningdevelopmentandinitialexternalvalidation |