Cargando…

Analysis of biomechanical gait parameters in patients after total hip replacement operated via anterolateral approach depending on size of the femoral head implant: retrospective matched-cohort study

INTRODUCTION: Total hip replacement (THR) is considered one of the most effective medical procedures in treatment of osteoarthritis. Since its introduction, there has been a worldwide debate over proper implant selection in terms of size, bearing type and shape. Following study was designed to asses...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stolarczyk, Artur, Stolarczyk, Magda, Oleksy, Łukasz, Maciąg, Grzegorz J., Stępiński, Piotr, Szymczak, Jakub, Świercz, Maciej, Żarnovsky, Krystian, Mostowy, Marcin, Maciąg, Bartosz M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9596593/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34837506
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-04264-6
_version_ 1784815907156000768
author Stolarczyk, Artur
Stolarczyk, Magda
Oleksy, Łukasz
Maciąg, Grzegorz J.
Stępiński, Piotr
Szymczak, Jakub
Świercz, Maciej
Żarnovsky, Krystian
Mostowy, Marcin
Maciąg, Bartosz M.
author_facet Stolarczyk, Artur
Stolarczyk, Magda
Oleksy, Łukasz
Maciąg, Grzegorz J.
Stępiński, Piotr
Szymczak, Jakub
Świercz, Maciej
Żarnovsky, Krystian
Mostowy, Marcin
Maciąg, Bartosz M.
author_sort Stolarczyk, Artur
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Total hip replacement (THR) is considered one of the most effective medical procedures in treatment of osteoarthritis. Since its introduction, there has been a worldwide debate over proper implant selection in terms of size, bearing type and shape. Following study was designed to assess the importance of femoral head size in long-term follow-up. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cohort of 30 patients with primary end stage osteoarthritis who underwent total hip replacement was analysed retrospectively. A homogenous group was chosen with no major differences in BMI. Patients’ gait parameters were measured in a biomechanics laboratory using the 3D BTS Smart system. WOMAC and VAS questionnaires were used to assess patient reported outcome. RESULTS: The subgroup with larger implant head size had several outcomes significantly superior to the subgroup with standard head size and non-inferior to healthy hips. Following variables were measured during this study: time of support phase, time of swing phase, double support time, walking hip extension angle. CONCLUSIONS: Use of larger sized femoral heads during THR gives better results in terms of gait pattern. Since restoring the gait pattern is one of the aspects of rehabilitation and returning to daily activities it seems to be an important observation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9596593
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95965932022-10-27 Analysis of biomechanical gait parameters in patients after total hip replacement operated via anterolateral approach depending on size of the femoral head implant: retrospective matched-cohort study Stolarczyk, Artur Stolarczyk, Magda Oleksy, Łukasz Maciąg, Grzegorz J. Stępiński, Piotr Szymczak, Jakub Świercz, Maciej Żarnovsky, Krystian Mostowy, Marcin Maciąg, Bartosz M. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg Hip Arthroplasty INTRODUCTION: Total hip replacement (THR) is considered one of the most effective medical procedures in treatment of osteoarthritis. Since its introduction, there has been a worldwide debate over proper implant selection in terms of size, bearing type and shape. Following study was designed to assess the importance of femoral head size in long-term follow-up. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cohort of 30 patients with primary end stage osteoarthritis who underwent total hip replacement was analysed retrospectively. A homogenous group was chosen with no major differences in BMI. Patients’ gait parameters were measured in a biomechanics laboratory using the 3D BTS Smart system. WOMAC and VAS questionnaires were used to assess patient reported outcome. RESULTS: The subgroup with larger implant head size had several outcomes significantly superior to the subgroup with standard head size and non-inferior to healthy hips. Following variables were measured during this study: time of support phase, time of swing phase, double support time, walking hip extension angle. CONCLUSIONS: Use of larger sized femoral heads during THR gives better results in terms of gait pattern. Since restoring the gait pattern is one of the aspects of rehabilitation and returning to daily activities it seems to be an important observation. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-11-27 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9596593/ /pubmed/34837506 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-04264-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Hip Arthroplasty
Stolarczyk, Artur
Stolarczyk, Magda
Oleksy, Łukasz
Maciąg, Grzegorz J.
Stępiński, Piotr
Szymczak, Jakub
Świercz, Maciej
Żarnovsky, Krystian
Mostowy, Marcin
Maciąg, Bartosz M.
Analysis of biomechanical gait parameters in patients after total hip replacement operated via anterolateral approach depending on size of the femoral head implant: retrospective matched-cohort study
title Analysis of biomechanical gait parameters in patients after total hip replacement operated via anterolateral approach depending on size of the femoral head implant: retrospective matched-cohort study
title_full Analysis of biomechanical gait parameters in patients after total hip replacement operated via anterolateral approach depending on size of the femoral head implant: retrospective matched-cohort study
title_fullStr Analysis of biomechanical gait parameters in patients after total hip replacement operated via anterolateral approach depending on size of the femoral head implant: retrospective matched-cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of biomechanical gait parameters in patients after total hip replacement operated via anterolateral approach depending on size of the femoral head implant: retrospective matched-cohort study
title_short Analysis of biomechanical gait parameters in patients after total hip replacement operated via anterolateral approach depending on size of the femoral head implant: retrospective matched-cohort study
title_sort analysis of biomechanical gait parameters in patients after total hip replacement operated via anterolateral approach depending on size of the femoral head implant: retrospective matched-cohort study
topic Hip Arthroplasty
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9596593/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34837506
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-04264-6
work_keys_str_mv AT stolarczykartur analysisofbiomechanicalgaitparametersinpatientsaftertotalhipreplacementoperatedviaanterolateralapproachdependingonsizeofthefemoralheadimplantretrospectivematchedcohortstudy
AT stolarczykmagda analysisofbiomechanicalgaitparametersinpatientsaftertotalhipreplacementoperatedviaanterolateralapproachdependingonsizeofthefemoralheadimplantretrospectivematchedcohortstudy
AT oleksyłukasz analysisofbiomechanicalgaitparametersinpatientsaftertotalhipreplacementoperatedviaanterolateralapproachdependingonsizeofthefemoralheadimplantretrospectivematchedcohortstudy
AT maciaggrzegorzj analysisofbiomechanicalgaitparametersinpatientsaftertotalhipreplacementoperatedviaanterolateralapproachdependingonsizeofthefemoralheadimplantretrospectivematchedcohortstudy
AT stepinskipiotr analysisofbiomechanicalgaitparametersinpatientsaftertotalhipreplacementoperatedviaanterolateralapproachdependingonsizeofthefemoralheadimplantretrospectivematchedcohortstudy
AT szymczakjakub analysisofbiomechanicalgaitparametersinpatientsaftertotalhipreplacementoperatedviaanterolateralapproachdependingonsizeofthefemoralheadimplantretrospectivematchedcohortstudy
AT swierczmaciej analysisofbiomechanicalgaitparametersinpatientsaftertotalhipreplacementoperatedviaanterolateralapproachdependingonsizeofthefemoralheadimplantretrospectivematchedcohortstudy
AT zarnovskykrystian analysisofbiomechanicalgaitparametersinpatientsaftertotalhipreplacementoperatedviaanterolateralapproachdependingonsizeofthefemoralheadimplantretrospectivematchedcohortstudy
AT mostowymarcin analysisofbiomechanicalgaitparametersinpatientsaftertotalhipreplacementoperatedviaanterolateralapproachdependingonsizeofthefemoralheadimplantretrospectivematchedcohortstudy
AT maciagbartoszm analysisofbiomechanicalgaitparametersinpatientsaftertotalhipreplacementoperatedviaanterolateralapproachdependingonsizeofthefemoralheadimplantretrospectivematchedcohortstudy