Cargando…

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Ofatumumab for the Treatment of Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis in Canada

BACKGROUND: Ofatumumab is a high-efficacy disease-modifying therapy (DMT) approved for first-line treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) in Canada. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost effectiveness of ofatumumab from a Canadian healthcare system perspective....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Baharnoori, Moogeh, Bhan, Virender, Clift, Fraser, Thomas, Kimberly, Mouallif, Soukaïna, Adlard, Nicholas, Cooney, Philip, Blanchette, François, Patel, Barkha P., Grima, Daniel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9596641/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36107307
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41669-022-00363-1
_version_ 1784815914517004288
author Baharnoori, Moogeh
Bhan, Virender
Clift, Fraser
Thomas, Kimberly
Mouallif, Soukaïna
Adlard, Nicholas
Cooney, Philip
Blanchette, François
Patel, Barkha P.
Grima, Daniel
author_facet Baharnoori, Moogeh
Bhan, Virender
Clift, Fraser
Thomas, Kimberly
Mouallif, Soukaïna
Adlard, Nicholas
Cooney, Philip
Blanchette, François
Patel, Barkha P.
Grima, Daniel
author_sort Baharnoori, Moogeh
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Ofatumumab is a high-efficacy disease-modifying therapy (DMT) approved for first-line treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) in Canada. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost effectiveness of ofatumumab from a Canadian healthcare system perspective. METHODS: A Markov cohort model was run over 65 years using annual cycles, 1.5% annual discount rate, and 100% treatment discontinuation at 10 years. The British Columbia database informed natural history transition probabilities. Treatment efficacy for DMTs were sourced from a network meta-analysis. Clinical trial data were used to estimate probabilities for treatment-related adverse events. Health utilities and costs were obtained from Canadian sources (if available) and the literature. RESULTS: Among first-line indicated therapies for RRMS, ofatumumab was dominant (more effective, lower costs) over teriflunomide, interferons, dimethyl fumarate, and ocrelizumab. Compared with glatiramer acetate and best supportive care, ofatumumab resulted in incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) of $24,189 Canadian dollars per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) and $28,014/QALY, respectively. At a willingness-to-pay threshold of $50,000/QALY, ofatumumab had a 64.3% probability of being cost effective. Among second-line therapies (scenario analysis), ofatumumab dominated natalizumab and fingolimod and resulted in an ICER of $50,969 versus cladribine. CONCLUSIONS: Ofatumumab is cost effective against all comparators and dominant against all currently approved and reimbursed first-line DMTs for RRMS, except glatiramer acetate. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s41669-022-00363-1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9596641
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95966412022-10-27 Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Ofatumumab for the Treatment of Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis in Canada Baharnoori, Moogeh Bhan, Virender Clift, Fraser Thomas, Kimberly Mouallif, Soukaïna Adlard, Nicholas Cooney, Philip Blanchette, François Patel, Barkha P. Grima, Daniel Pharmacoecon Open Original Research Article BACKGROUND: Ofatumumab is a high-efficacy disease-modifying therapy (DMT) approved for first-line treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) in Canada. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost effectiveness of ofatumumab from a Canadian healthcare system perspective. METHODS: A Markov cohort model was run over 65 years using annual cycles, 1.5% annual discount rate, and 100% treatment discontinuation at 10 years. The British Columbia database informed natural history transition probabilities. Treatment efficacy for DMTs were sourced from a network meta-analysis. Clinical trial data were used to estimate probabilities for treatment-related adverse events. Health utilities and costs were obtained from Canadian sources (if available) and the literature. RESULTS: Among first-line indicated therapies for RRMS, ofatumumab was dominant (more effective, lower costs) over teriflunomide, interferons, dimethyl fumarate, and ocrelizumab. Compared with glatiramer acetate and best supportive care, ofatumumab resulted in incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) of $24,189 Canadian dollars per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) and $28,014/QALY, respectively. At a willingness-to-pay threshold of $50,000/QALY, ofatumumab had a 64.3% probability of being cost effective. Among second-line therapies (scenario analysis), ofatumumab dominated natalizumab and fingolimod and resulted in an ICER of $50,969 versus cladribine. CONCLUSIONS: Ofatumumab is cost effective against all comparators and dominant against all currently approved and reimbursed first-line DMTs for RRMS, except glatiramer acetate. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s41669-022-00363-1. Springer International Publishing 2022-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9596641/ /pubmed/36107307 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41669-022-00363-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Baharnoori, Moogeh
Bhan, Virender
Clift, Fraser
Thomas, Kimberly
Mouallif, Soukaïna
Adlard, Nicholas
Cooney, Philip
Blanchette, François
Patel, Barkha P.
Grima, Daniel
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Ofatumumab for the Treatment of Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis in Canada
title Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Ofatumumab for the Treatment of Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis in Canada
title_full Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Ofatumumab for the Treatment of Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis in Canada
title_fullStr Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Ofatumumab for the Treatment of Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis in Canada
title_full_unstemmed Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Ofatumumab for the Treatment of Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis in Canada
title_short Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Ofatumumab for the Treatment of Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis in Canada
title_sort cost-effectiveness analysis of ofatumumab for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in canada
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9596641/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36107307
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41669-022-00363-1
work_keys_str_mv AT baharnoorimoogeh costeffectivenessanalysisofofatumumabforthetreatmentofrelapsingremittingmultiplesclerosisincanada
AT bhanvirender costeffectivenessanalysisofofatumumabforthetreatmentofrelapsingremittingmultiplesclerosisincanada
AT cliftfraser costeffectivenessanalysisofofatumumabforthetreatmentofrelapsingremittingmultiplesclerosisincanada
AT thomaskimberly costeffectivenessanalysisofofatumumabforthetreatmentofrelapsingremittingmultiplesclerosisincanada
AT mouallifsoukaina costeffectivenessanalysisofofatumumabforthetreatmentofrelapsingremittingmultiplesclerosisincanada
AT adlardnicholas costeffectivenessanalysisofofatumumabforthetreatmentofrelapsingremittingmultiplesclerosisincanada
AT cooneyphilip costeffectivenessanalysisofofatumumabforthetreatmentofrelapsingremittingmultiplesclerosisincanada
AT blanchettefrancois costeffectivenessanalysisofofatumumabforthetreatmentofrelapsingremittingmultiplesclerosisincanada
AT patelbarkhap costeffectivenessanalysisofofatumumabforthetreatmentofrelapsingremittingmultiplesclerosisincanada
AT grimadaniel costeffectivenessanalysisofofatumumabforthetreatmentofrelapsingremittingmultiplesclerosisincanada