Cargando…

Accuracy of digital surgical guides for dental implants

BACKGROUND: Recently developed imaging techniques, such as cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and CAD/CAM technology, have facilitated reliable implant planning and implant surgical guide production by 3D printing. This study compared the accuracy of implant-guided surgery using the R2GATE(®) prog...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Myoung-Ju, Jeong, Jun Young, Ryu, Jaeyoung, Jung, Seunggon, Park, Hong-Ju, Oh, Hee-Kyun, Kook, Min-Suk
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Nature Singapore 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9596667/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36282400
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40902-022-00364-4
_version_ 1784815917526417408
author Kim, Myoung-Ju
Jeong, Jun Young
Ryu, Jaeyoung
Jung, Seunggon
Park, Hong-Ju
Oh, Hee-Kyun
Kook, Min-Suk
author_facet Kim, Myoung-Ju
Jeong, Jun Young
Ryu, Jaeyoung
Jung, Seunggon
Park, Hong-Ju
Oh, Hee-Kyun
Kook, Min-Suk
author_sort Kim, Myoung-Ju
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Recently developed imaging techniques, such as cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and CAD/CAM technology, have facilitated reliable implant planning and implant surgical guide production by 3D printing. This study compared the accuracy of implant-guided surgery using the R2GATE(®) program with CBCT before and after surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included patients who visited the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery at Chonnam National University Hospital from September 2021 to March 2022. Twenty-four implants were placed in eleven patients. Using R2GATE(®) Windows (Megagen implant, Daegu, Korea) software, implant placement was planned. The difference was measured by the CBCT before and after surgery. The cervical and apical distance and angular deviation of the implants were measured. Statistical analysis was performed using an independent t-test, Pearson correlation, and multiple regression analyses. RESULTS: The three-dimensional linear distance difference between the planned implant and the placed implant was 0.97 ± 0.37 mm at the cervical and 1.13 ± 0.36 mm at the apical. The difference in angle deviation between the planned implant and the placed implant was 3.42 ± 2.12°. Among the variables affecting the accuracy of implant placement, a statistically significant difference was found when using a tissue-supported implant guide, implant diameter and implant length. CONCLUSION: Based on these results, using the R2GATE(®) program is useful to use an implant digital surgical guide, and it will be used in various clinic.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9596667
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Nature Singapore
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95966672022-10-27 Accuracy of digital surgical guides for dental implants Kim, Myoung-Ju Jeong, Jun Young Ryu, Jaeyoung Jung, Seunggon Park, Hong-Ju Oh, Hee-Kyun Kook, Min-Suk Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg Research BACKGROUND: Recently developed imaging techniques, such as cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and CAD/CAM technology, have facilitated reliable implant planning and implant surgical guide production by 3D printing. This study compared the accuracy of implant-guided surgery using the R2GATE(®) program with CBCT before and after surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included patients who visited the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery at Chonnam National University Hospital from September 2021 to March 2022. Twenty-four implants were placed in eleven patients. Using R2GATE(®) Windows (Megagen implant, Daegu, Korea) software, implant placement was planned. The difference was measured by the CBCT before and after surgery. The cervical and apical distance and angular deviation of the implants were measured. Statistical analysis was performed using an independent t-test, Pearson correlation, and multiple regression analyses. RESULTS: The three-dimensional linear distance difference between the planned implant and the placed implant was 0.97 ± 0.37 mm at the cervical and 1.13 ± 0.36 mm at the apical. The difference in angle deviation between the planned implant and the placed implant was 3.42 ± 2.12°. Among the variables affecting the accuracy of implant placement, a statistically significant difference was found when using a tissue-supported implant guide, implant diameter and implant length. CONCLUSION: Based on these results, using the R2GATE(®) program is useful to use an implant digital surgical guide, and it will be used in various clinic. Springer Nature Singapore 2022-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9596667/ /pubmed/36282400 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40902-022-00364-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research
Kim, Myoung-Ju
Jeong, Jun Young
Ryu, Jaeyoung
Jung, Seunggon
Park, Hong-Ju
Oh, Hee-Kyun
Kook, Min-Suk
Accuracy of digital surgical guides for dental implants
title Accuracy of digital surgical guides for dental implants
title_full Accuracy of digital surgical guides for dental implants
title_fullStr Accuracy of digital surgical guides for dental implants
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy of digital surgical guides for dental implants
title_short Accuracy of digital surgical guides for dental implants
title_sort accuracy of digital surgical guides for dental implants
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9596667/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36282400
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40902-022-00364-4
work_keys_str_mv AT kimmyoungju accuracyofdigitalsurgicalguidesfordentalimplants
AT jeongjunyoung accuracyofdigitalsurgicalguidesfordentalimplants
AT ryujaeyoung accuracyofdigitalsurgicalguidesfordentalimplants
AT jungseunggon accuracyofdigitalsurgicalguidesfordentalimplants
AT parkhongju accuracyofdigitalsurgicalguidesfordentalimplants
AT ohheekyun accuracyofdigitalsurgicalguidesfordentalimplants
AT kookminsuk accuracyofdigitalsurgicalguidesfordentalimplants