Cargando…
Accuracy of digital surgical guides for dental implants
BACKGROUND: Recently developed imaging techniques, such as cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and CAD/CAM technology, have facilitated reliable implant planning and implant surgical guide production by 3D printing. This study compared the accuracy of implant-guided surgery using the R2GATE(®) prog...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Nature Singapore
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9596667/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36282400 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40902-022-00364-4 |
_version_ | 1784815917526417408 |
---|---|
author | Kim, Myoung-Ju Jeong, Jun Young Ryu, Jaeyoung Jung, Seunggon Park, Hong-Ju Oh, Hee-Kyun Kook, Min-Suk |
author_facet | Kim, Myoung-Ju Jeong, Jun Young Ryu, Jaeyoung Jung, Seunggon Park, Hong-Ju Oh, Hee-Kyun Kook, Min-Suk |
author_sort | Kim, Myoung-Ju |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Recently developed imaging techniques, such as cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and CAD/CAM technology, have facilitated reliable implant planning and implant surgical guide production by 3D printing. This study compared the accuracy of implant-guided surgery using the R2GATE(®) program with CBCT before and after surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included patients who visited the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery at Chonnam National University Hospital from September 2021 to March 2022. Twenty-four implants were placed in eleven patients. Using R2GATE(®) Windows (Megagen implant, Daegu, Korea) software, implant placement was planned. The difference was measured by the CBCT before and after surgery. The cervical and apical distance and angular deviation of the implants were measured. Statistical analysis was performed using an independent t-test, Pearson correlation, and multiple regression analyses. RESULTS: The three-dimensional linear distance difference between the planned implant and the placed implant was 0.97 ± 0.37 mm at the cervical and 1.13 ± 0.36 mm at the apical. The difference in angle deviation between the planned implant and the placed implant was 3.42 ± 2.12°. Among the variables affecting the accuracy of implant placement, a statistically significant difference was found when using a tissue-supported implant guide, implant diameter and implant length. CONCLUSION: Based on these results, using the R2GATE(®) program is useful to use an implant digital surgical guide, and it will be used in various clinic. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9596667 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Nature Singapore |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95966672022-10-27 Accuracy of digital surgical guides for dental implants Kim, Myoung-Ju Jeong, Jun Young Ryu, Jaeyoung Jung, Seunggon Park, Hong-Ju Oh, Hee-Kyun Kook, Min-Suk Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg Research BACKGROUND: Recently developed imaging techniques, such as cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and CAD/CAM technology, have facilitated reliable implant planning and implant surgical guide production by 3D printing. This study compared the accuracy of implant-guided surgery using the R2GATE(®) program with CBCT before and after surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included patients who visited the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery at Chonnam National University Hospital from September 2021 to March 2022. Twenty-four implants were placed in eleven patients. Using R2GATE(®) Windows (Megagen implant, Daegu, Korea) software, implant placement was planned. The difference was measured by the CBCT before and after surgery. The cervical and apical distance and angular deviation of the implants were measured. Statistical analysis was performed using an independent t-test, Pearson correlation, and multiple regression analyses. RESULTS: The three-dimensional linear distance difference between the planned implant and the placed implant was 0.97 ± 0.37 mm at the cervical and 1.13 ± 0.36 mm at the apical. The difference in angle deviation between the planned implant and the placed implant was 3.42 ± 2.12°. Among the variables affecting the accuracy of implant placement, a statistically significant difference was found when using a tissue-supported implant guide, implant diameter and implant length. CONCLUSION: Based on these results, using the R2GATE(®) program is useful to use an implant digital surgical guide, and it will be used in various clinic. Springer Nature Singapore 2022-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9596667/ /pubmed/36282400 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40902-022-00364-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Research Kim, Myoung-Ju Jeong, Jun Young Ryu, Jaeyoung Jung, Seunggon Park, Hong-Ju Oh, Hee-Kyun Kook, Min-Suk Accuracy of digital surgical guides for dental implants |
title | Accuracy of digital surgical guides for dental implants |
title_full | Accuracy of digital surgical guides for dental implants |
title_fullStr | Accuracy of digital surgical guides for dental implants |
title_full_unstemmed | Accuracy of digital surgical guides for dental implants |
title_short | Accuracy of digital surgical guides for dental implants |
title_sort | accuracy of digital surgical guides for dental implants |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9596667/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36282400 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40902-022-00364-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kimmyoungju accuracyofdigitalsurgicalguidesfordentalimplants AT jeongjunyoung accuracyofdigitalsurgicalguidesfordentalimplants AT ryujaeyoung accuracyofdigitalsurgicalguidesfordentalimplants AT jungseunggon accuracyofdigitalsurgicalguidesfordentalimplants AT parkhongju accuracyofdigitalsurgicalguidesfordentalimplants AT ohheekyun accuracyofdigitalsurgicalguidesfordentalimplants AT kookminsuk accuracyofdigitalsurgicalguidesfordentalimplants |