Cargando…
Death or survival, which you measure may affect conclusions: A methodological study
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Considering the opposite outcome—for example, survival instead of death—may affect conclusions about which subpopulation benefits more from a treatment or suffers more from an exposure. METHODS: For case studies on death following COVID‐19 and bankruptcy following melanoma, we c...
Autores principales: | Shannin, Jake, Brumback, Babette A. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9596942/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36310758 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.905 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Ergosterol extraction: a comparison of methodologies
por: Wilkes, Thomas I.
Publicado: (2023) -
Marginal measures and causal effects using the relative survival framework
por: Syriopoulou, Elisavet, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Does Consideration and Assessment of Effects on Health Equity Affect the Conclusions of Systematic Reviews? A Methodology Study
por: Welch, Vivian, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Methodological issues for determining intervals of subsequent cancer screening
por: Bae, Jong-Myon
Publicado: (2014) -
‘Not clinically effective but cost-effective’ - paradoxical conclusions in randomised controlled trials with ‘doubly null’ results: a cross-sectional study
por: Raftery, James, et al.
Publicado: (2020)