Cargando…

A feasibility study of a decision aid to support family carers of people with severe dementia or those towards the end-of-life

BACKGROUND: Advance care planning in dementia does not always happen. As dementia progresses, decisions are often left for family carers to make with professionals. AIM: To test the feasibility and acceptability of the delivery and use of a decision aid for family carers of people with severe dement...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Davies, Nathan, Aker, Narin, Vickerstaff, Victoria, Sampson, Elizabeth L, Rait, Greta
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9596957/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36081274
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/02692163221122379
_version_ 1784815985185783808
author Davies, Nathan
Aker, Narin
Vickerstaff, Victoria
Sampson, Elizabeth L
Rait, Greta
author_facet Davies, Nathan
Aker, Narin
Vickerstaff, Victoria
Sampson, Elizabeth L
Rait, Greta
author_sort Davies, Nathan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Advance care planning in dementia does not always happen. As dementia progresses, decisions are often left for family carers to make with professionals. AIM: To test the feasibility and acceptability of the delivery and use of a decision aid for family carers of people with severe dementia or towards the end-of-life. DESIGN: Feasibility study using a before-after design of a paper-based decision aid with family carers of people with severe dementia or towards the end-of-life. Criteria for whether to progress to full evaluation included achieving: 70% recruitment rate of target of 30 people, and retention of 70% at 6 months. Outcome measures at baseline, 3 and 6 months, included: the Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS), Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10), EQ5D-5L and Satisfaction with Care at the End of Life (SWC-EOLD). PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-eight family carers were recruited (93% of target), 26 completed baseline assessment and 20 (71%) of those were followed-up at 6 months. RESULTS: Almost all outcomes changed indicating improvement over 6 months. The DCS and K10 scores decreased indicating less decisional conflict and less psychological distress. The decision aid was acceptable, 25% found it very helpful and 55% a little helpful at 6 months. CONCLUSION: We met the success criteria demonstrating this study was feasible and acceptable to carers. Future research should test the effectiveness of the decision aid in a full scale evaluation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9596957
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95969572022-10-27 A feasibility study of a decision aid to support family carers of people with severe dementia or those towards the end-of-life Davies, Nathan Aker, Narin Vickerstaff, Victoria Sampson, Elizabeth L Rait, Greta Palliat Med Short Reports BACKGROUND: Advance care planning in dementia does not always happen. As dementia progresses, decisions are often left for family carers to make with professionals. AIM: To test the feasibility and acceptability of the delivery and use of a decision aid for family carers of people with severe dementia or towards the end-of-life. DESIGN: Feasibility study using a before-after design of a paper-based decision aid with family carers of people with severe dementia or towards the end-of-life. Criteria for whether to progress to full evaluation included achieving: 70% recruitment rate of target of 30 people, and retention of 70% at 6 months. Outcome measures at baseline, 3 and 6 months, included: the Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS), Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10), EQ5D-5L and Satisfaction with Care at the End of Life (SWC-EOLD). PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-eight family carers were recruited (93% of target), 26 completed baseline assessment and 20 (71%) of those were followed-up at 6 months. RESULTS: Almost all outcomes changed indicating improvement over 6 months. The DCS and K10 scores decreased indicating less decisional conflict and less psychological distress. The decision aid was acceptable, 25% found it very helpful and 55% a little helpful at 6 months. CONCLUSION: We met the success criteria demonstrating this study was feasible and acceptable to carers. Future research should test the effectiveness of the decision aid in a full scale evaluation. SAGE Publications 2022-09-08 2022-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9596957/ /pubmed/36081274 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/02692163221122379 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Short Reports
Davies, Nathan
Aker, Narin
Vickerstaff, Victoria
Sampson, Elizabeth L
Rait, Greta
A feasibility study of a decision aid to support family carers of people with severe dementia or those towards the end-of-life
title A feasibility study of a decision aid to support family carers of people with severe dementia or those towards the end-of-life
title_full A feasibility study of a decision aid to support family carers of people with severe dementia or those towards the end-of-life
title_fullStr A feasibility study of a decision aid to support family carers of people with severe dementia or those towards the end-of-life
title_full_unstemmed A feasibility study of a decision aid to support family carers of people with severe dementia or those towards the end-of-life
title_short A feasibility study of a decision aid to support family carers of people with severe dementia or those towards the end-of-life
title_sort feasibility study of a decision aid to support family carers of people with severe dementia or those towards the end-of-life
topic Short Reports
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9596957/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36081274
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/02692163221122379
work_keys_str_mv AT daviesnathan afeasibilitystudyofadecisionaidtosupportfamilycarersofpeoplewithseveredementiaorthosetowardstheendoflife
AT akernarin afeasibilitystudyofadecisionaidtosupportfamilycarersofpeoplewithseveredementiaorthosetowardstheendoflife
AT vickerstaffvictoria afeasibilitystudyofadecisionaidtosupportfamilycarersofpeoplewithseveredementiaorthosetowardstheendoflife
AT sampsonelizabethl afeasibilitystudyofadecisionaidtosupportfamilycarersofpeoplewithseveredementiaorthosetowardstheendoflife
AT raitgreta afeasibilitystudyofadecisionaidtosupportfamilycarersofpeoplewithseveredementiaorthosetowardstheendoflife
AT daviesnathan feasibilitystudyofadecisionaidtosupportfamilycarersofpeoplewithseveredementiaorthosetowardstheendoflife
AT akernarin feasibilitystudyofadecisionaidtosupportfamilycarersofpeoplewithseveredementiaorthosetowardstheendoflife
AT vickerstaffvictoria feasibilitystudyofadecisionaidtosupportfamilycarersofpeoplewithseveredementiaorthosetowardstheendoflife
AT sampsonelizabethl feasibilitystudyofadecisionaidtosupportfamilycarersofpeoplewithseveredementiaorthosetowardstheendoflife
AT raitgreta feasibilitystudyofadecisionaidtosupportfamilycarersofpeoplewithseveredementiaorthosetowardstheendoflife