Cargando…

Efficacy of twice-daily high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on associative memory

OBJECTIVES: Several studies have examined the effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on associative memory (AM) but findings were inconsistent. Here, we aimed to test whether twice-daily rTMS could significantly improve AM. METHODS: In this single-blind, sham-controlled exper...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hua, Qiang, Zhang, Yuanyuan, Li, Qianqian, Gao, Xiaoran, Du, Rongrong, Wang, Yingru, Zhou, Qian, Zhang, Ting, Sun, Jinmei, Zhang, Lei, Ji, Gong-jun, Wang, Kai
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9596967/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36310842
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2022.973298
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVES: Several studies have examined the effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on associative memory (AM) but findings were inconsistent. Here, we aimed to test whether twice-daily rTMS could significantly improve AM. METHODS: In this single-blind, sham-controlled experiment, 40 participants were randomized to receive twice-daily sham or real rTMS sessions for five consecutive days (a total of 16,000 pulses). The stimulation target in left inferior parietal lobule (IPL) exhibiting peak functional connectivity to the left hippocampus was individually defined for each participant. Participants completed both a picture-cued word association task and Stroop test at baseline and 1 day after the final real or sham rTMS session. Effects of twice-daily rTMS on AM and Stroop test performance were compared using two-way repeated measures analysis of variance with main factors Group (real vs. sham) and Time (baseline vs. post-rTMS). RESULTS: There was a significant Group × Time interaction effect. AM score was significantly enhanced in the twice-daily real group after rTMS, but this difference could not survive the post hoc analysis after multiple comparison correction. Further, AM improvement in the twice-daily real group was not superior to a previously reported once-daily rTMS group receiving 8,000 pulses. Then, we combined the twice- and once-daily real groups, and found a significant Group × Time interaction effect. Post hoc analysis indicated that the AM score was significantly enhanced in the real group after multiple comparisons correction. CONCLUSION: Our prospective experiment did not show significant rTMS effect on AM, but this effect may become significant if more participants could be recruited as revealed by our retrospective analysis.