Cargando…

The Impact of Current Tobacco Product Use Definitions on Estimates of Transitions Between Cigarette and ENDS Use

INTRODUCTION: Definitions of current tobacco and nicotine delivery product use vary and depend on frequency of use, established-use criteria, and the product type. Previous research has not considered how transition rates between current use of different products depend on the current use definition...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brouwer, Andrew F, Levy, David T, Jeon, Jihyoun, Jimenez-Mendoza, Evelyn, Sanchez-Romero, Luz María, Mistry, Ritesh, Meza, Rafael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9597012/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35589561
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntac132
_version_ 1784815996494675968
author Brouwer, Andrew F
Levy, David T
Jeon, Jihyoun
Jimenez-Mendoza, Evelyn
Sanchez-Romero, Luz María
Mistry, Ritesh
Meza, Rafael
author_facet Brouwer, Andrew F
Levy, David T
Jeon, Jihyoun
Jimenez-Mendoza, Evelyn
Sanchez-Romero, Luz María
Mistry, Ritesh
Meza, Rafael
author_sort Brouwer, Andrew F
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Definitions of current tobacco and nicotine delivery product use vary and depend on frequency of use, established-use criteria, and the product type. Previous research has not considered how transition rates between current use of different products depend on the current use definition. AIMS AND METHODS: We applied a multistate transition model to data on U.S. adults from waves 1–4 (2013–2017) of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) study. We estimated transition rates between never, non-current, cigarette, electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS), and dual use states with and without established-use criteria (has smoked 100+ cigarettes in their lifetime; ever fairly regularly used ENDS) and different frequency thresholds (1+, 10+, 20+, and 30 days of the past 30 days). We considered use below a frequency threshold as either non-current use or a distinct, infrequent use category. RESULTS: When treating use below a frequency threshold as non-current use, transition probability estimates were largely robust to the choice of use frequency threshold, although sole ENDS users were more likely to transition to non-current use or dual use as the current use threshold increased. Removing the established-use criterion for ENDS reduced the estimates of sole ENDS and dual users staying in their use state. When treating infrequent use as a separate category, transition probability estimates were dependent on the use frequency threshold, particularly transitions among the dual use states. CONCLUSIONS: Product use definitions have important implications for assessing product use transitions and thus the public health implications of cigarette and ENDS control strategies. IMPLICATIONS: How we define “current use” of tobacco and nicotine delivery products changes our estimates of how individuals transition to, between, and from different patterns of use. We show that the robustness of transition estimates to whether or not non-established users are included as current users and to different frequency-of-use threshold depends in part on whether low-frequency users are categorized as non-current users or as a distinct category. Our results emphasize the importance of intentional definitions of product use that reflect the larger goals of public health and tobacco control.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9597012
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95970122022-10-31 The Impact of Current Tobacco Product Use Definitions on Estimates of Transitions Between Cigarette and ENDS Use Brouwer, Andrew F Levy, David T Jeon, Jihyoun Jimenez-Mendoza, Evelyn Sanchez-Romero, Luz María Mistry, Ritesh Meza, Rafael Nicotine Tob Res Original Investigations INTRODUCTION: Definitions of current tobacco and nicotine delivery product use vary and depend on frequency of use, established-use criteria, and the product type. Previous research has not considered how transition rates between current use of different products depend on the current use definition. AIMS AND METHODS: We applied a multistate transition model to data on U.S. adults from waves 1–4 (2013–2017) of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) study. We estimated transition rates between never, non-current, cigarette, electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS), and dual use states with and without established-use criteria (has smoked 100+ cigarettes in their lifetime; ever fairly regularly used ENDS) and different frequency thresholds (1+, 10+, 20+, and 30 days of the past 30 days). We considered use below a frequency threshold as either non-current use or a distinct, infrequent use category. RESULTS: When treating use below a frequency threshold as non-current use, transition probability estimates were largely robust to the choice of use frequency threshold, although sole ENDS users were more likely to transition to non-current use or dual use as the current use threshold increased. Removing the established-use criterion for ENDS reduced the estimates of sole ENDS and dual users staying in their use state. When treating infrequent use as a separate category, transition probability estimates were dependent on the use frequency threshold, particularly transitions among the dual use states. CONCLUSIONS: Product use definitions have important implications for assessing product use transitions and thus the public health implications of cigarette and ENDS control strategies. IMPLICATIONS: How we define “current use” of tobacco and nicotine delivery products changes our estimates of how individuals transition to, between, and from different patterns of use. We show that the robustness of transition estimates to whether or not non-established users are included as current users and to different frequency-of-use threshold depends in part on whether low-frequency users are categorized as non-current users or as a distinct category. Our results emphasize the importance of intentional definitions of product use that reflect the larger goals of public health and tobacco control. Oxford University Press 2022-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9597012/ /pubmed/35589561 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntac132 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Original Investigations
Brouwer, Andrew F
Levy, David T
Jeon, Jihyoun
Jimenez-Mendoza, Evelyn
Sanchez-Romero, Luz María
Mistry, Ritesh
Meza, Rafael
The Impact of Current Tobacco Product Use Definitions on Estimates of Transitions Between Cigarette and ENDS Use
title The Impact of Current Tobacco Product Use Definitions on Estimates of Transitions Between Cigarette and ENDS Use
title_full The Impact of Current Tobacco Product Use Definitions on Estimates of Transitions Between Cigarette and ENDS Use
title_fullStr The Impact of Current Tobacco Product Use Definitions on Estimates of Transitions Between Cigarette and ENDS Use
title_full_unstemmed The Impact of Current Tobacco Product Use Definitions on Estimates of Transitions Between Cigarette and ENDS Use
title_short The Impact of Current Tobacco Product Use Definitions on Estimates of Transitions Between Cigarette and ENDS Use
title_sort impact of current tobacco product use definitions on estimates of transitions between cigarette and ends use
topic Original Investigations
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9597012/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35589561
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntac132
work_keys_str_mv AT brouwerandrewf theimpactofcurrenttobaccoproductusedefinitionsonestimatesoftransitionsbetweencigaretteandendsuse
AT levydavidt theimpactofcurrenttobaccoproductusedefinitionsonestimatesoftransitionsbetweencigaretteandendsuse
AT jeonjihyoun theimpactofcurrenttobaccoproductusedefinitionsonestimatesoftransitionsbetweencigaretteandendsuse
AT jimenezmendozaevelyn theimpactofcurrenttobaccoproductusedefinitionsonestimatesoftransitionsbetweencigaretteandendsuse
AT sanchezromeroluzmaria theimpactofcurrenttobaccoproductusedefinitionsonestimatesoftransitionsbetweencigaretteandendsuse
AT mistryritesh theimpactofcurrenttobaccoproductusedefinitionsonestimatesoftransitionsbetweencigaretteandendsuse
AT mezarafael theimpactofcurrenttobaccoproductusedefinitionsonestimatesoftransitionsbetweencigaretteandendsuse
AT brouwerandrewf impactofcurrenttobaccoproductusedefinitionsonestimatesoftransitionsbetweencigaretteandendsuse
AT levydavidt impactofcurrenttobaccoproductusedefinitionsonestimatesoftransitionsbetweencigaretteandendsuse
AT jeonjihyoun impactofcurrenttobaccoproductusedefinitionsonestimatesoftransitionsbetweencigaretteandendsuse
AT jimenezmendozaevelyn impactofcurrenttobaccoproductusedefinitionsonestimatesoftransitionsbetweencigaretteandendsuse
AT sanchezromeroluzmaria impactofcurrenttobaccoproductusedefinitionsonestimatesoftransitionsbetweencigaretteandendsuse
AT mistryritesh impactofcurrenttobaccoproductusedefinitionsonestimatesoftransitionsbetweencigaretteandendsuse
AT mezarafael impactofcurrenttobaccoproductusedefinitionsonestimatesoftransitionsbetweencigaretteandendsuse