Cargando…

Assessment of Cystatin C Level for Risk Stratification in Adults With Chronic Kidney Disease

IMPORTANCE: Kidney function is usually estimated from serum creatinine level, whereas an alternative glomerular filtration marker (cystatin C level) associates more closely with future risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and mortality. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether testing concordance between est...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lees, Jennifer S., Rutherford, Elaine, Stevens, Kathryn I., Chen, Debbie C., Scherzer, Rebecca, Estrella, Michelle M., Sullivan, Michael K., Ebert, Natalie, Mark, Patrick B., Shlipak, Michael G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Medical Association 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9597396/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36282503
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.38300
_version_ 1784816082947670016
author Lees, Jennifer S.
Rutherford, Elaine
Stevens, Kathryn I.
Chen, Debbie C.
Scherzer, Rebecca
Estrella, Michelle M.
Sullivan, Michael K.
Ebert, Natalie
Mark, Patrick B.
Shlipak, Michael G.
author_facet Lees, Jennifer S.
Rutherford, Elaine
Stevens, Kathryn I.
Chen, Debbie C.
Scherzer, Rebecca
Estrella, Michelle M.
Sullivan, Michael K.
Ebert, Natalie
Mark, Patrick B.
Shlipak, Michael G.
author_sort Lees, Jennifer S.
collection PubMed
description IMPORTANCE: Kidney function is usually estimated from serum creatinine level, whereas an alternative glomerular filtration marker (cystatin C level) associates more closely with future risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and mortality. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether testing concordance between estimated glomerular filtration rates based on cystatin C (eGFRcys) and creatinine (eGFRcr) levels would improve risk stratification for future outcomes and whether estimations differ by age. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A prospective population-based cohort study (UK Biobank), with participants recruited between 2006-2010 with median follow-up of 11.5 (IQR, 10.8-12.2) years; data were collected until August 31, 2020. Participants had eGFRcr greater than or equal to 45 mL/min/1.73 m(2), albuminuria (albumin <30 mg/g), and no preexisting CVD or kidney failure. EXPOSURES: Chronic kidney disease status was categorized by concordance between eGFRcr and eGFRcys across the threshold for hronic kidney disease (CKD) diagnosis (60 mL/min/1.73 m(2)). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Ten-year probabilities of CVD, mortality, and kidney failure were assessed according to CKD status. Multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards models tested associations between CVD and mortality. Area under the receiving operating curve tested discrimination of eGFRcr and eGFRcys for CVD and mortality. The Net Reclassification Index assessed the usefulness of eGFRcr and eGFRcys for CVD risk stratification. Analyses were stratified by older (age 65-73 years) and younger (age <65 years) age. RESULTS: There were 428 402 participants: median age was 57 (IQR, 50-63) years and 237 173 (55.4%) were women. Among 76 629 older participants, there were 9335 deaths and 5205 CVD events. Among 351 773 younger participants, there were 14 776 deaths and 9328 CVD events. The 10-year probability of kidney failure was less than 0.1%. Regardless of the eGFRcr, the 10-year probabilities of CVD and mortality were low when eGFRcys was greater than or equal to 60 mL/min/1.73 m(2); conversely, with eGFRcys less than 60 mL/min/1.73 m(2), 10-year risks were nearly doubled in older adults and more than doubled in younger adults. Use of eGFRcys better discriminated CVD and mortality risk than eGFRcr. Across a 7.5% 10-year risk threshold for CVD, eGFRcys improved case Net Reclassification Index by 0.7% (95% CI, 0.6%-0.8%) in older people and 0.7% (95% CI, 0.7%-0.8%) in younger people; eGFRcr did not add to CVD risk estimation. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The findings of this study suggest that eGFRcr 45 to 59 mL/min/1.73 m(2) includes a proportion of individuals at low risk and fails to capture a substantial proportion of individuals at high-risk for CVD and mortality. The eGFRcys appears to be more sensitive and specific for CVD and mortality risks in mild CKD.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9597396
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher American Medical Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95973962022-11-14 Assessment of Cystatin C Level for Risk Stratification in Adults With Chronic Kidney Disease Lees, Jennifer S. Rutherford, Elaine Stevens, Kathryn I. Chen, Debbie C. Scherzer, Rebecca Estrella, Michelle M. Sullivan, Michael K. Ebert, Natalie Mark, Patrick B. Shlipak, Michael G. JAMA Netw Open Original Investigation IMPORTANCE: Kidney function is usually estimated from serum creatinine level, whereas an alternative glomerular filtration marker (cystatin C level) associates more closely with future risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and mortality. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether testing concordance between estimated glomerular filtration rates based on cystatin C (eGFRcys) and creatinine (eGFRcr) levels would improve risk stratification for future outcomes and whether estimations differ by age. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A prospective population-based cohort study (UK Biobank), with participants recruited between 2006-2010 with median follow-up of 11.5 (IQR, 10.8-12.2) years; data were collected until August 31, 2020. Participants had eGFRcr greater than or equal to 45 mL/min/1.73 m(2), albuminuria (albumin <30 mg/g), and no preexisting CVD or kidney failure. EXPOSURES: Chronic kidney disease status was categorized by concordance between eGFRcr and eGFRcys across the threshold for hronic kidney disease (CKD) diagnosis (60 mL/min/1.73 m(2)). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Ten-year probabilities of CVD, mortality, and kidney failure were assessed according to CKD status. Multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards models tested associations between CVD and mortality. Area under the receiving operating curve tested discrimination of eGFRcr and eGFRcys for CVD and mortality. The Net Reclassification Index assessed the usefulness of eGFRcr and eGFRcys for CVD risk stratification. Analyses were stratified by older (age 65-73 years) and younger (age <65 years) age. RESULTS: There were 428 402 participants: median age was 57 (IQR, 50-63) years and 237 173 (55.4%) were women. Among 76 629 older participants, there were 9335 deaths and 5205 CVD events. Among 351 773 younger participants, there were 14 776 deaths and 9328 CVD events. The 10-year probability of kidney failure was less than 0.1%. Regardless of the eGFRcr, the 10-year probabilities of CVD and mortality were low when eGFRcys was greater than or equal to 60 mL/min/1.73 m(2); conversely, with eGFRcys less than 60 mL/min/1.73 m(2), 10-year risks were nearly doubled in older adults and more than doubled in younger adults. Use of eGFRcys better discriminated CVD and mortality risk than eGFRcr. Across a 7.5% 10-year risk threshold for CVD, eGFRcys improved case Net Reclassification Index by 0.7% (95% CI, 0.6%-0.8%) in older people and 0.7% (95% CI, 0.7%-0.8%) in younger people; eGFRcr did not add to CVD risk estimation. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The findings of this study suggest that eGFRcr 45 to 59 mL/min/1.73 m(2) includes a proportion of individuals at low risk and fails to capture a substantial proportion of individuals at high-risk for CVD and mortality. The eGFRcys appears to be more sensitive and specific for CVD and mortality risks in mild CKD. American Medical Association 2022-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9597396/ /pubmed/36282503 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.38300 Text en Copyright 2022 Lees JS et al. JAMA Network Open. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.
spellingShingle Original Investigation
Lees, Jennifer S.
Rutherford, Elaine
Stevens, Kathryn I.
Chen, Debbie C.
Scherzer, Rebecca
Estrella, Michelle M.
Sullivan, Michael K.
Ebert, Natalie
Mark, Patrick B.
Shlipak, Michael G.
Assessment of Cystatin C Level for Risk Stratification in Adults With Chronic Kidney Disease
title Assessment of Cystatin C Level for Risk Stratification in Adults With Chronic Kidney Disease
title_full Assessment of Cystatin C Level for Risk Stratification in Adults With Chronic Kidney Disease
title_fullStr Assessment of Cystatin C Level for Risk Stratification in Adults With Chronic Kidney Disease
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of Cystatin C Level for Risk Stratification in Adults With Chronic Kidney Disease
title_short Assessment of Cystatin C Level for Risk Stratification in Adults With Chronic Kidney Disease
title_sort assessment of cystatin c level for risk stratification in adults with chronic kidney disease
topic Original Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9597396/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36282503
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.38300
work_keys_str_mv AT leesjennifers assessmentofcystatinclevelforriskstratificationinadultswithchronickidneydisease
AT rutherfordelaine assessmentofcystatinclevelforriskstratificationinadultswithchronickidneydisease
AT stevenskathryni assessmentofcystatinclevelforriskstratificationinadultswithchronickidneydisease
AT chendebbiec assessmentofcystatinclevelforriskstratificationinadultswithchronickidneydisease
AT scherzerrebecca assessmentofcystatinclevelforriskstratificationinadultswithchronickidneydisease
AT estrellamichellem assessmentofcystatinclevelforriskstratificationinadultswithchronickidneydisease
AT sullivanmichaelk assessmentofcystatinclevelforriskstratificationinadultswithchronickidneydisease
AT ebertnatalie assessmentofcystatinclevelforriskstratificationinadultswithchronickidneydisease
AT markpatrickb assessmentofcystatinclevelforriskstratificationinadultswithchronickidneydisease
AT shlipakmichaelg assessmentofcystatinclevelforriskstratificationinadultswithchronickidneydisease