Cargando…

Molecular subtypes based on cuproptosis-related genes and immune profiles in lung adenocarcinoma

Background: Recent studies have identified several molecular subtypes of lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) that have different prognoses to help predict the efficacy of immunotherapy. However, the prognostic prediction is less than satisfactory. Alterations in intracellular copper levels may affect the tum...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Yufei, Zhang, Chen, Ji, Chengyue, Jin, Wenli, He, Xin, Yu, Shunzhi, Guo, Renhua
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9597639/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36313439
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2022.1006938
Descripción
Sumario:Background: Recent studies have identified several molecular subtypes of lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) that have different prognoses to help predict the efficacy of immunotherapy. However, the prognostic prediction is less than satisfactory. Alterations in intracellular copper levels may affect the tumor immune microenvironment and are linked to cancer progression. Previous studies have identified some genes related to cuproptosis. The characteristics of the cuproptosis molecular subtypes have not been thoroughly studied in LUAD. Methods: The transcriptomic data and clinical information of 632 LUAD patients were used to investigate the LUAD molecular subtypes that are associated with the cuproptosis-related genes (CRGs), the tumor immune microenvironment, and stemness. The cuproptosis score was constructed using univariate Cox regression and the minor absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) to quantify the prognostic characteristics. Results: Three different molecular subtypes related to cuproptosis, with different prognoses, were identified in LUAD. Cluster A had the highest cuproptosis score and the worst prognosis. Patients in the high cuproptosis score group had a higher somatic mutation frequency and stemness scores. Patients in the low cuproptosis score group had more immune infiltration and better prognosis. Conclusion: Molecular subtypes of LUAD based on CRGs reflect the differences in LUAD patients. The cuproptosis score can be used as a promising biomarker, which is of great significance to distinguish the relationship between cuproptosis and the immune microenvironment. The cuproptosis signature based on the cuproptosis score and clinical characteristics of individual patients will be useful for guiding immunotherapy in LUAD.