Cargando…

An Experience Sampling Measure of the Key Features of Rumination

OBJECTIVE: Research indicates that rumination can be viewed as a dynamic process that fluctuates over time, within hours and days. An increasing number of intensive longitudinal studies on rumination are accordingly being conducted and published using experiencing sampling methodology (ESM), a techn...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hoebeke, Yorgo, Blanchard, M. Annelise, Contreras, Alba, Heeren, Alexandre
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Giovanni Fioriti Editore srl 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9597648/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36340270
http://dx.doi.org/10.36131/cnfioritieditore20220504
_version_ 1784816142001373184
author Hoebeke, Yorgo
Blanchard, M. Annelise
Contreras, Alba
Heeren, Alexandre
author_facet Hoebeke, Yorgo
Blanchard, M. Annelise
Contreras, Alba
Heeren, Alexandre
author_sort Hoebeke, Yorgo
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Research indicates that rumination can be viewed as a dynamic process that fluctuates over time, within hours and days. An increasing number of intensive longitudinal studies on rumination are accordingly being conducted and published using experiencing sampling methodology (ESM), a technique with measurements in everyday life. Yet, this literature suffers from a profound caveat: rumination has so far been conceptualized and measured as a unitary construct in these ESM studies. This is unfortunate, since such a unitary view contrasts with prominent contemporary models that regard rumination as a multifaceted construct, wherein the key features are not interchangeable and should therefore be measured separately. Moreover, no validated ESM measure of the key features of rumination has yet been developed. Therefore, we developed and validated an ESM protocol and the first ESM questionnaire to assess rumination as a multifaceted construct, measuring five features of rumination. METHOD: We conducted an ESM study in a community sample of 40 French-speaking participants. They answered the five rumination ESM items in French four times a day for fourteen days. At the end of the ESM assessment period, participants completed trait-like questionnaires of rumination, depression, and general anxiety. RESULTS: The ESM rumination items exhibited good psychometric properties, including excellent within-person variability and convergent validity with corresponding trait-like constructs. CONCLUSIONS: Although further validation is warranted, this novel ESM assessment protocol of rumination as a multifaceted construct (validated in French and translated into English) will allow future researchers to study how rumination’s features fluctuate and interact with other constructs over time.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9597648
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Giovanni Fioriti Editore srl
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95976482022-11-04 An Experience Sampling Measure of the Key Features of Rumination Hoebeke, Yorgo Blanchard, M. Annelise Contreras, Alba Heeren, Alexandre Clin Neuropsychiatry Research Paper OBJECTIVE: Research indicates that rumination can be viewed as a dynamic process that fluctuates over time, within hours and days. An increasing number of intensive longitudinal studies on rumination are accordingly being conducted and published using experiencing sampling methodology (ESM), a technique with measurements in everyday life. Yet, this literature suffers from a profound caveat: rumination has so far been conceptualized and measured as a unitary construct in these ESM studies. This is unfortunate, since such a unitary view contrasts with prominent contemporary models that regard rumination as a multifaceted construct, wherein the key features are not interchangeable and should therefore be measured separately. Moreover, no validated ESM measure of the key features of rumination has yet been developed. Therefore, we developed and validated an ESM protocol and the first ESM questionnaire to assess rumination as a multifaceted construct, measuring five features of rumination. METHOD: We conducted an ESM study in a community sample of 40 French-speaking participants. They answered the five rumination ESM items in French four times a day for fourteen days. At the end of the ESM assessment period, participants completed trait-like questionnaires of rumination, depression, and general anxiety. RESULTS: The ESM rumination items exhibited good psychometric properties, including excellent within-person variability and convergent validity with corresponding trait-like constructs. CONCLUSIONS: Although further validation is warranted, this novel ESM assessment protocol of rumination as a multifaceted construct (validated in French and translated into English) will allow future researchers to study how rumination’s features fluctuate and interact with other constructs over time. Giovanni Fioriti Editore srl 2022-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9597648/ /pubmed/36340270 http://dx.doi.org/10.36131/cnfioritieditore20220504 Text en © 2022 Giovanni Fioriti Editore s.r.l. This is an open access article. Distribution and reproduction are permitted in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Hoebeke, Yorgo
Blanchard, M. Annelise
Contreras, Alba
Heeren, Alexandre
An Experience Sampling Measure of the Key Features of Rumination
title An Experience Sampling Measure of the Key Features of Rumination
title_full An Experience Sampling Measure of the Key Features of Rumination
title_fullStr An Experience Sampling Measure of the Key Features of Rumination
title_full_unstemmed An Experience Sampling Measure of the Key Features of Rumination
title_short An Experience Sampling Measure of the Key Features of Rumination
title_sort experience sampling measure of the key features of rumination
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9597648/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36340270
http://dx.doi.org/10.36131/cnfioritieditore20220504
work_keys_str_mv AT hoebekeyorgo anexperiencesamplingmeasureofthekeyfeaturesofrumination
AT blanchardmannelise anexperiencesamplingmeasureofthekeyfeaturesofrumination
AT contrerasalba anexperiencesamplingmeasureofthekeyfeaturesofrumination
AT heerenalexandre anexperiencesamplingmeasureofthekeyfeaturesofrumination
AT hoebekeyorgo experiencesamplingmeasureofthekeyfeaturesofrumination
AT blanchardmannelise experiencesamplingmeasureofthekeyfeaturesofrumination
AT contrerasalba experiencesamplingmeasureofthekeyfeaturesofrumination
AT heerenalexandre experiencesamplingmeasureofthekeyfeaturesofrumination