Cargando…
An Experience Sampling Measure of the Key Features of Rumination
OBJECTIVE: Research indicates that rumination can be viewed as a dynamic process that fluctuates over time, within hours and days. An increasing number of intensive longitudinal studies on rumination are accordingly being conducted and published using experiencing sampling methodology (ESM), a techn...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Giovanni Fioriti Editore srl
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9597648/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36340270 http://dx.doi.org/10.36131/cnfioritieditore20220504 |
_version_ | 1784816142001373184 |
---|---|
author | Hoebeke, Yorgo Blanchard, M. Annelise Contreras, Alba Heeren, Alexandre |
author_facet | Hoebeke, Yorgo Blanchard, M. Annelise Contreras, Alba Heeren, Alexandre |
author_sort | Hoebeke, Yorgo |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Research indicates that rumination can be viewed as a dynamic process that fluctuates over time, within hours and days. An increasing number of intensive longitudinal studies on rumination are accordingly being conducted and published using experiencing sampling methodology (ESM), a technique with measurements in everyday life. Yet, this literature suffers from a profound caveat: rumination has so far been conceptualized and measured as a unitary construct in these ESM studies. This is unfortunate, since such a unitary view contrasts with prominent contemporary models that regard rumination as a multifaceted construct, wherein the key features are not interchangeable and should therefore be measured separately. Moreover, no validated ESM measure of the key features of rumination has yet been developed. Therefore, we developed and validated an ESM protocol and the first ESM questionnaire to assess rumination as a multifaceted construct, measuring five features of rumination. METHOD: We conducted an ESM study in a community sample of 40 French-speaking participants. They answered the five rumination ESM items in French four times a day for fourteen days. At the end of the ESM assessment period, participants completed trait-like questionnaires of rumination, depression, and general anxiety. RESULTS: The ESM rumination items exhibited good psychometric properties, including excellent within-person variability and convergent validity with corresponding trait-like constructs. CONCLUSIONS: Although further validation is warranted, this novel ESM assessment protocol of rumination as a multifaceted construct (validated in French and translated into English) will allow future researchers to study how rumination’s features fluctuate and interact with other constructs over time. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9597648 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Giovanni Fioriti Editore srl |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95976482022-11-04 An Experience Sampling Measure of the Key Features of Rumination Hoebeke, Yorgo Blanchard, M. Annelise Contreras, Alba Heeren, Alexandre Clin Neuropsychiatry Research Paper OBJECTIVE: Research indicates that rumination can be viewed as a dynamic process that fluctuates over time, within hours and days. An increasing number of intensive longitudinal studies on rumination are accordingly being conducted and published using experiencing sampling methodology (ESM), a technique with measurements in everyday life. Yet, this literature suffers from a profound caveat: rumination has so far been conceptualized and measured as a unitary construct in these ESM studies. This is unfortunate, since such a unitary view contrasts with prominent contemporary models that regard rumination as a multifaceted construct, wherein the key features are not interchangeable and should therefore be measured separately. Moreover, no validated ESM measure of the key features of rumination has yet been developed. Therefore, we developed and validated an ESM protocol and the first ESM questionnaire to assess rumination as a multifaceted construct, measuring five features of rumination. METHOD: We conducted an ESM study in a community sample of 40 French-speaking participants. They answered the five rumination ESM items in French four times a day for fourteen days. At the end of the ESM assessment period, participants completed trait-like questionnaires of rumination, depression, and general anxiety. RESULTS: The ESM rumination items exhibited good psychometric properties, including excellent within-person variability and convergent validity with corresponding trait-like constructs. CONCLUSIONS: Although further validation is warranted, this novel ESM assessment protocol of rumination as a multifaceted construct (validated in French and translated into English) will allow future researchers to study how rumination’s features fluctuate and interact with other constructs over time. Giovanni Fioriti Editore srl 2022-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9597648/ /pubmed/36340270 http://dx.doi.org/10.36131/cnfioritieditore20220504 Text en © 2022 Giovanni Fioriti Editore s.r.l. This is an open access article. Distribution and reproduction are permitted in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Paper Hoebeke, Yorgo Blanchard, M. Annelise Contreras, Alba Heeren, Alexandre An Experience Sampling Measure of the Key Features of Rumination |
title | An Experience Sampling Measure of the Key Features of Rumination |
title_full | An Experience Sampling Measure of the Key Features of Rumination |
title_fullStr | An Experience Sampling Measure of the Key Features of Rumination |
title_full_unstemmed | An Experience Sampling Measure of the Key Features of Rumination |
title_short | An Experience Sampling Measure of the Key Features of Rumination |
title_sort | experience sampling measure of the key features of rumination |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9597648/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36340270 http://dx.doi.org/10.36131/cnfioritieditore20220504 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hoebekeyorgo anexperiencesamplingmeasureofthekeyfeaturesofrumination AT blanchardmannelise anexperiencesamplingmeasureofthekeyfeaturesofrumination AT contrerasalba anexperiencesamplingmeasureofthekeyfeaturesofrumination AT heerenalexandre anexperiencesamplingmeasureofthekeyfeaturesofrumination AT hoebekeyorgo experiencesamplingmeasureofthekeyfeaturesofrumination AT blanchardmannelise experiencesamplingmeasureofthekeyfeaturesofrumination AT contrerasalba experiencesamplingmeasureofthekeyfeaturesofrumination AT heerenalexandre experiencesamplingmeasureofthekeyfeaturesofrumination |