Cargando…
The Use of Removed Mesquite Brush as a Fiber Replacement in Silage Production
SIMPLE SUMMARY: Mesquite is considered an invasive browse species in most of the American Southwest, spreading rapidly into Texas and leading to disruption of native grasslands. Management efforts generate a significant volume of organic debris. Incorporation of this organic material into livestock...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9597713/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36290181 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani12202795 |
_version_ | 1784816156125691904 |
---|---|
author | Fair, William Taylor Breeden, Jeffrey Bryan Atchley, Thomas Wayne Lambert, Barry Don Aljoe, Zhan Owsley, Walter Franklin Smith, William Brandon |
author_facet | Fair, William Taylor Breeden, Jeffrey Bryan Atchley, Thomas Wayne Lambert, Barry Don Aljoe, Zhan Owsley, Walter Franklin Smith, William Brandon |
author_sort | Fair, William Taylor |
collection | PubMed |
description | SIMPLE SUMMARY: Mesquite is considered an invasive browse species in most of the American Southwest, spreading rapidly into Texas and leading to disruption of native grasslands. Management efforts generate a significant volume of organic debris. Incorporation of this organic material into livestock feeding efforts would represent a sustainable solution to this ecological problem. Our objectives were to (1) determine the nutritive value and fermentation characteristics of silage produced with mesquite biomass, and (2) evaluate potential pre-treatment methods of mesquite biomass prior to ensiling. Inclusion of mesquite biomass in a bermudagrass-based silage was shown to increase fiber concentrations, decrease crude protein and in vitro digestibility, and decrease fermentation quality (pH and volatile fatty acids [VFA]). However, 250 g kg(−1) inclusion of mesquite was shown to be similar to grass silage alone. There was no effect of lactic acid bacteria inoculation, though increasing length of incubation did increase VFA production and decrease silage pH. Pre-treatment of mesquite biomass with acid or alkali did not improve ensiling properties. Results are interpreted to mean that mesquite biomass may be effectively incorporated into silage at levels up to 250 g kg(−1). ABSTRACT: Mesquite (Prosopis L.) is considered an invasive browse species in most of the American Southwest. Mechanical intervention removes yields an excess of organic debris. Anecdotal evidence in the past has supported using such browse as feed for livestock. Thus, our objectives were to (1) determine the nutritive value and fermentation characteristics of silage produced with mesquite biomass, and (2) evaluate solvent treatment of mesquite biomass prior to ensiling. In Experiment 1, we evaluated mesquite inclusion rate (0, 250, 500, 750, or 1000 g kg(−1) DM), length of fermentation (28, 56, or 84 d), and silage inoculant. In Experiment 2, we evaluated the effects of mesquite pre-treatment with acid (H(2)SO(4)) or alkali (NaOH) solutions. Concentrations of NDF, ADF, and ADL, as well as IVTD, decreased (p < 0.05) with increasing mesquite inclusion. However, 250 g mesquite kg(−1) DM did not differ from grass silage. There was no effect (p > 0.05) of inoculation, though increasing length of incubation did increase (p < 0.05) VFA production and decrease (p < 0.05) silage pH. Solvent treatment did not improve ensiling properties. Results are interpreted to mean that mesquite biomass may be effectively incorporated into silage at levels up to 250 g kg(−1). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9597713 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95977132022-10-27 The Use of Removed Mesquite Brush as a Fiber Replacement in Silage Production Fair, William Taylor Breeden, Jeffrey Bryan Atchley, Thomas Wayne Lambert, Barry Don Aljoe, Zhan Owsley, Walter Franklin Smith, William Brandon Animals (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: Mesquite is considered an invasive browse species in most of the American Southwest, spreading rapidly into Texas and leading to disruption of native grasslands. Management efforts generate a significant volume of organic debris. Incorporation of this organic material into livestock feeding efforts would represent a sustainable solution to this ecological problem. Our objectives were to (1) determine the nutritive value and fermentation characteristics of silage produced with mesquite biomass, and (2) evaluate potential pre-treatment methods of mesquite biomass prior to ensiling. Inclusion of mesquite biomass in a bermudagrass-based silage was shown to increase fiber concentrations, decrease crude protein and in vitro digestibility, and decrease fermentation quality (pH and volatile fatty acids [VFA]). However, 250 g kg(−1) inclusion of mesquite was shown to be similar to grass silage alone. There was no effect of lactic acid bacteria inoculation, though increasing length of incubation did increase VFA production and decrease silage pH. Pre-treatment of mesquite biomass with acid or alkali did not improve ensiling properties. Results are interpreted to mean that mesquite biomass may be effectively incorporated into silage at levels up to 250 g kg(−1). ABSTRACT: Mesquite (Prosopis L.) is considered an invasive browse species in most of the American Southwest. Mechanical intervention removes yields an excess of organic debris. Anecdotal evidence in the past has supported using such browse as feed for livestock. Thus, our objectives were to (1) determine the nutritive value and fermentation characteristics of silage produced with mesquite biomass, and (2) evaluate solvent treatment of mesquite biomass prior to ensiling. In Experiment 1, we evaluated mesquite inclusion rate (0, 250, 500, 750, or 1000 g kg(−1) DM), length of fermentation (28, 56, or 84 d), and silage inoculant. In Experiment 2, we evaluated the effects of mesquite pre-treatment with acid (H(2)SO(4)) or alkali (NaOH) solutions. Concentrations of NDF, ADF, and ADL, as well as IVTD, decreased (p < 0.05) with increasing mesquite inclusion. However, 250 g mesquite kg(−1) DM did not differ from grass silage. There was no effect (p > 0.05) of inoculation, though increasing length of incubation did increase (p < 0.05) VFA production and decrease (p < 0.05) silage pH. Solvent treatment did not improve ensiling properties. Results are interpreted to mean that mesquite biomass may be effectively incorporated into silage at levels up to 250 g kg(−1). MDPI 2022-10-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9597713/ /pubmed/36290181 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani12202795 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Fair, William Taylor Breeden, Jeffrey Bryan Atchley, Thomas Wayne Lambert, Barry Don Aljoe, Zhan Owsley, Walter Franklin Smith, William Brandon The Use of Removed Mesquite Brush as a Fiber Replacement in Silage Production |
title | The Use of Removed Mesquite Brush as a Fiber Replacement in Silage Production |
title_full | The Use of Removed Mesquite Brush as a Fiber Replacement in Silage Production |
title_fullStr | The Use of Removed Mesquite Brush as a Fiber Replacement in Silage Production |
title_full_unstemmed | The Use of Removed Mesquite Brush as a Fiber Replacement in Silage Production |
title_short | The Use of Removed Mesquite Brush as a Fiber Replacement in Silage Production |
title_sort | use of removed mesquite brush as a fiber replacement in silage production |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9597713/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36290181 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani12202795 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fairwilliamtaylor theuseofremovedmesquitebrushasafiberreplacementinsilageproduction AT breedenjeffreybryan theuseofremovedmesquitebrushasafiberreplacementinsilageproduction AT atchleythomaswayne theuseofremovedmesquitebrushasafiberreplacementinsilageproduction AT lambertbarrydon theuseofremovedmesquitebrushasafiberreplacementinsilageproduction AT aljoezhan theuseofremovedmesquitebrushasafiberreplacementinsilageproduction AT owsleywalterfranklin theuseofremovedmesquitebrushasafiberreplacementinsilageproduction AT smithwilliambrandon theuseofremovedmesquitebrushasafiberreplacementinsilageproduction AT fairwilliamtaylor useofremovedmesquitebrushasafiberreplacementinsilageproduction AT breedenjeffreybryan useofremovedmesquitebrushasafiberreplacementinsilageproduction AT atchleythomaswayne useofremovedmesquitebrushasafiberreplacementinsilageproduction AT lambertbarrydon useofremovedmesquitebrushasafiberreplacementinsilageproduction AT aljoezhan useofremovedmesquitebrushasafiberreplacementinsilageproduction AT owsleywalterfranklin useofremovedmesquitebrushasafiberreplacementinsilageproduction AT smithwilliambrandon useofremovedmesquitebrushasafiberreplacementinsilageproduction |