Cargando…

The Use of Removed Mesquite Brush as a Fiber Replacement in Silage Production

SIMPLE SUMMARY: Mesquite is considered an invasive browse species in most of the American Southwest, spreading rapidly into Texas and leading to disruption of native grasslands. Management efforts generate a significant volume of organic debris. Incorporation of this organic material into livestock...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fair, William Taylor, Breeden, Jeffrey Bryan, Atchley, Thomas Wayne, Lambert, Barry Don, Aljoe, Zhan, Owsley, Walter Franklin, Smith, William Brandon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9597713/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36290181
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani12202795
_version_ 1784816156125691904
author Fair, William Taylor
Breeden, Jeffrey Bryan
Atchley, Thomas Wayne
Lambert, Barry Don
Aljoe, Zhan
Owsley, Walter Franklin
Smith, William Brandon
author_facet Fair, William Taylor
Breeden, Jeffrey Bryan
Atchley, Thomas Wayne
Lambert, Barry Don
Aljoe, Zhan
Owsley, Walter Franklin
Smith, William Brandon
author_sort Fair, William Taylor
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: Mesquite is considered an invasive browse species in most of the American Southwest, spreading rapidly into Texas and leading to disruption of native grasslands. Management efforts generate a significant volume of organic debris. Incorporation of this organic material into livestock feeding efforts would represent a sustainable solution to this ecological problem. Our objectives were to (1) determine the nutritive value and fermentation characteristics of silage produced with mesquite biomass, and (2) evaluate potential pre-treatment methods of mesquite biomass prior to ensiling. Inclusion of mesquite biomass in a bermudagrass-based silage was shown to increase fiber concentrations, decrease crude protein and in vitro digestibility, and decrease fermentation quality (pH and volatile fatty acids [VFA]). However, 250 g kg(−1) inclusion of mesquite was shown to be similar to grass silage alone. There was no effect of lactic acid bacteria inoculation, though increasing length of incubation did increase VFA production and decrease silage pH. Pre-treatment of mesquite biomass with acid or alkali did not improve ensiling properties. Results are interpreted to mean that mesquite biomass may be effectively incorporated into silage at levels up to 250 g kg(−1). ABSTRACT: Mesquite (Prosopis L.) is considered an invasive browse species in most of the American Southwest. Mechanical intervention removes yields an excess of organic debris. Anecdotal evidence in the past has supported using such browse as feed for livestock. Thus, our objectives were to (1) determine the nutritive value and fermentation characteristics of silage produced with mesquite biomass, and (2) evaluate solvent treatment of mesquite biomass prior to ensiling. In Experiment 1, we evaluated mesquite inclusion rate (0, 250, 500, 750, or 1000 g kg(−1) DM), length of fermentation (28, 56, or 84 d), and silage inoculant. In Experiment 2, we evaluated the effects of mesquite pre-treatment with acid (H(2)SO(4)) or alkali (NaOH) solutions. Concentrations of NDF, ADF, and ADL, as well as IVTD, decreased (p < 0.05) with increasing mesquite inclusion. However, 250 g mesquite kg(−1) DM did not differ from grass silage. There was no effect (p > 0.05) of inoculation, though increasing length of incubation did increase (p < 0.05) VFA production and decrease (p < 0.05) silage pH. Solvent treatment did not improve ensiling properties. Results are interpreted to mean that mesquite biomass may be effectively incorporated into silage at levels up to 250 g kg(−1).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9597713
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95977132022-10-27 The Use of Removed Mesquite Brush as a Fiber Replacement in Silage Production Fair, William Taylor Breeden, Jeffrey Bryan Atchley, Thomas Wayne Lambert, Barry Don Aljoe, Zhan Owsley, Walter Franklin Smith, William Brandon Animals (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: Mesquite is considered an invasive browse species in most of the American Southwest, spreading rapidly into Texas and leading to disruption of native grasslands. Management efforts generate a significant volume of organic debris. Incorporation of this organic material into livestock feeding efforts would represent a sustainable solution to this ecological problem. Our objectives were to (1) determine the nutritive value and fermentation characteristics of silage produced with mesquite biomass, and (2) evaluate potential pre-treatment methods of mesquite biomass prior to ensiling. Inclusion of mesquite biomass in a bermudagrass-based silage was shown to increase fiber concentrations, decrease crude protein and in vitro digestibility, and decrease fermentation quality (pH and volatile fatty acids [VFA]). However, 250 g kg(−1) inclusion of mesquite was shown to be similar to grass silage alone. There was no effect of lactic acid bacteria inoculation, though increasing length of incubation did increase VFA production and decrease silage pH. Pre-treatment of mesquite biomass with acid or alkali did not improve ensiling properties. Results are interpreted to mean that mesquite biomass may be effectively incorporated into silage at levels up to 250 g kg(−1). ABSTRACT: Mesquite (Prosopis L.) is considered an invasive browse species in most of the American Southwest. Mechanical intervention removes yields an excess of organic debris. Anecdotal evidence in the past has supported using such browse as feed for livestock. Thus, our objectives were to (1) determine the nutritive value and fermentation characteristics of silage produced with mesquite biomass, and (2) evaluate solvent treatment of mesquite biomass prior to ensiling. In Experiment 1, we evaluated mesquite inclusion rate (0, 250, 500, 750, or 1000 g kg(−1) DM), length of fermentation (28, 56, or 84 d), and silage inoculant. In Experiment 2, we evaluated the effects of mesquite pre-treatment with acid (H(2)SO(4)) or alkali (NaOH) solutions. Concentrations of NDF, ADF, and ADL, as well as IVTD, decreased (p < 0.05) with increasing mesquite inclusion. However, 250 g mesquite kg(−1) DM did not differ from grass silage. There was no effect (p > 0.05) of inoculation, though increasing length of incubation did increase (p < 0.05) VFA production and decrease (p < 0.05) silage pH. Solvent treatment did not improve ensiling properties. Results are interpreted to mean that mesquite biomass may be effectively incorporated into silage at levels up to 250 g kg(−1). MDPI 2022-10-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9597713/ /pubmed/36290181 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani12202795 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Fair, William Taylor
Breeden, Jeffrey Bryan
Atchley, Thomas Wayne
Lambert, Barry Don
Aljoe, Zhan
Owsley, Walter Franklin
Smith, William Brandon
The Use of Removed Mesquite Brush as a Fiber Replacement in Silage Production
title The Use of Removed Mesquite Brush as a Fiber Replacement in Silage Production
title_full The Use of Removed Mesquite Brush as a Fiber Replacement in Silage Production
title_fullStr The Use of Removed Mesquite Brush as a Fiber Replacement in Silage Production
title_full_unstemmed The Use of Removed Mesquite Brush as a Fiber Replacement in Silage Production
title_short The Use of Removed Mesquite Brush as a Fiber Replacement in Silage Production
title_sort use of removed mesquite brush as a fiber replacement in silage production
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9597713/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36290181
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani12202795
work_keys_str_mv AT fairwilliamtaylor theuseofremovedmesquitebrushasafiberreplacementinsilageproduction
AT breedenjeffreybryan theuseofremovedmesquitebrushasafiberreplacementinsilageproduction
AT atchleythomaswayne theuseofremovedmesquitebrushasafiberreplacementinsilageproduction
AT lambertbarrydon theuseofremovedmesquitebrushasafiberreplacementinsilageproduction
AT aljoezhan theuseofremovedmesquitebrushasafiberreplacementinsilageproduction
AT owsleywalterfranklin theuseofremovedmesquitebrushasafiberreplacementinsilageproduction
AT smithwilliambrandon theuseofremovedmesquitebrushasafiberreplacementinsilageproduction
AT fairwilliamtaylor useofremovedmesquitebrushasafiberreplacementinsilageproduction
AT breedenjeffreybryan useofremovedmesquitebrushasafiberreplacementinsilageproduction
AT atchleythomaswayne useofremovedmesquitebrushasafiberreplacementinsilageproduction
AT lambertbarrydon useofremovedmesquitebrushasafiberreplacementinsilageproduction
AT aljoezhan useofremovedmesquitebrushasafiberreplacementinsilageproduction
AT owsleywalterfranklin useofremovedmesquitebrushasafiberreplacementinsilageproduction
AT smithwilliambrandon useofremovedmesquitebrushasafiberreplacementinsilageproduction