Cargando…
Adherence to evidence-based practice across healthcare professionals in Germany: results from a cross-sectional, nationwide survey
BACKGROUND: Adherence to evidence-based practice (EBP) is considered a key competence to improve healthcare quality. In this study, we aimed to describe the EBP adherence of healthcare professionals working in Germany and to explore barriers and facilitators regarding the implementation of EBP in cl...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9597997/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36284307 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08682-z |
_version_ | 1784816224679493632 |
---|---|
author | Ehrenbrusthoff, Katja Braun, Tobias Bahns, Carolin Happe, Lisa Kopkow, Christian |
author_facet | Ehrenbrusthoff, Katja Braun, Tobias Bahns, Carolin Happe, Lisa Kopkow, Christian |
author_sort | Ehrenbrusthoff, Katja |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Adherence to evidence-based practice (EBP) is considered a key competence to improve healthcare quality. In this study, we aimed to describe the EBP adherence of healthcare professionals working in Germany and to explore barriers and facilitators regarding the implementation of EBP in clinical practice. METHODS: A nationwide online survey was performed among healthcare professionals in Germany from January to April 2018 using the German version of the Evidence-based Practice Inventory (EBPI) questionnaire for a comprehensive assessment of adherence to EBP. Univariate logistic regression analyses were performed to explore the association between demographic and professional determinants and each EBPI dimension. RESULTS: We analysed data of 889 participants, including 318 physical therapists, 154 occupational therapists, 137 midwifes and 280 participants of six other healthcare professions. Approximately 70% of the participants generally demonstrated a positive attitude towards EBP and believed that EBP was useful in clinical practice. Broadly, 80% of the respondents evaluated themselves as being able to enact EBP behaviour in clinical practice. In contrast, less than 70% preferred to use quantitative information instead of their intuition to inform their habitual clinical behaviour. Still, 20 to 30% reported that EBP did not sufficiently account for their clinical experience and differences between patients. The strongest facilitators to EBP adherence across at least three dimensions of the EBPI were the availability of ≥ 60 min for scientific literature at work (OR: 9.67; 95% CI: 5.86; 16.30), followed by a master or higher academic degree (OR: 9.09, 95% CI: 5.86; 14.28) and the involvement in ≥ 1 scientific publication (OR: 7.06, 95% CI: 5.10; 9.85). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that healthcare professionals in Germany in general had a positive attitude towards EBP although they currently do not consider EBP principles in its entirety. The most important determinant positively influencing a healthcare professional’s decision to perform EBP was the time available for scientific literature at work. German healthcare professionals experience similar barriers towards the implementation of EBP in clinical practice compared to other international healthcare settings. These barriers should be targeted by future research. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00013792). Registered 19 January 2018. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-022-08682-z. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9597997 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95979972022-10-27 Adherence to evidence-based practice across healthcare professionals in Germany: results from a cross-sectional, nationwide survey Ehrenbrusthoff, Katja Braun, Tobias Bahns, Carolin Happe, Lisa Kopkow, Christian BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Adherence to evidence-based practice (EBP) is considered a key competence to improve healthcare quality. In this study, we aimed to describe the EBP adherence of healthcare professionals working in Germany and to explore barriers and facilitators regarding the implementation of EBP in clinical practice. METHODS: A nationwide online survey was performed among healthcare professionals in Germany from January to April 2018 using the German version of the Evidence-based Practice Inventory (EBPI) questionnaire for a comprehensive assessment of adherence to EBP. Univariate logistic regression analyses were performed to explore the association between demographic and professional determinants and each EBPI dimension. RESULTS: We analysed data of 889 participants, including 318 physical therapists, 154 occupational therapists, 137 midwifes and 280 participants of six other healthcare professions. Approximately 70% of the participants generally demonstrated a positive attitude towards EBP and believed that EBP was useful in clinical practice. Broadly, 80% of the respondents evaluated themselves as being able to enact EBP behaviour in clinical practice. In contrast, less than 70% preferred to use quantitative information instead of their intuition to inform their habitual clinical behaviour. Still, 20 to 30% reported that EBP did not sufficiently account for their clinical experience and differences between patients. The strongest facilitators to EBP adherence across at least three dimensions of the EBPI were the availability of ≥ 60 min for scientific literature at work (OR: 9.67; 95% CI: 5.86; 16.30), followed by a master or higher academic degree (OR: 9.09, 95% CI: 5.86; 14.28) and the involvement in ≥ 1 scientific publication (OR: 7.06, 95% CI: 5.10; 9.85). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that healthcare professionals in Germany in general had a positive attitude towards EBP although they currently do not consider EBP principles in its entirety. The most important determinant positively influencing a healthcare professional’s decision to perform EBP was the time available for scientific literature at work. German healthcare professionals experience similar barriers towards the implementation of EBP in clinical practice compared to other international healthcare settings. These barriers should be targeted by future research. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00013792). Registered 19 January 2018. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-022-08682-z. BioMed Central 2022-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9597997/ /pubmed/36284307 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08682-z Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Ehrenbrusthoff, Katja Braun, Tobias Bahns, Carolin Happe, Lisa Kopkow, Christian Adherence to evidence-based practice across healthcare professionals in Germany: results from a cross-sectional, nationwide survey |
title | Adherence to evidence-based practice across healthcare professionals in Germany: results from a cross-sectional, nationwide survey |
title_full | Adherence to evidence-based practice across healthcare professionals in Germany: results from a cross-sectional, nationwide survey |
title_fullStr | Adherence to evidence-based practice across healthcare professionals in Germany: results from a cross-sectional, nationwide survey |
title_full_unstemmed | Adherence to evidence-based practice across healthcare professionals in Germany: results from a cross-sectional, nationwide survey |
title_short | Adherence to evidence-based practice across healthcare professionals in Germany: results from a cross-sectional, nationwide survey |
title_sort | adherence to evidence-based practice across healthcare professionals in germany: results from a cross-sectional, nationwide survey |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9597997/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36284307 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08682-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ehrenbrusthoffkatja adherencetoevidencebasedpracticeacrosshealthcareprofessionalsingermanyresultsfromacrosssectionalnationwidesurvey AT brauntobias adherencetoevidencebasedpracticeacrosshealthcareprofessionalsingermanyresultsfromacrosssectionalnationwidesurvey AT bahnscarolin adherencetoevidencebasedpracticeacrosshealthcareprofessionalsingermanyresultsfromacrosssectionalnationwidesurvey AT happelisa adherencetoevidencebasedpracticeacrosshealthcareprofessionalsingermanyresultsfromacrosssectionalnationwidesurvey AT kopkowchristian adherencetoevidencebasedpracticeacrosshealthcareprofessionalsingermanyresultsfromacrosssectionalnationwidesurvey |