Cargando…

Barriers and facilitators of domain-specific physical activity: a systematic review of reviews

BACKGROUND: Knowing what facilitates and hinders physical activity behaviour across domains (leisure, travel, work or education, and household) is central for the development of actions for more active lifestyles. Thus, the aim of this systematic review of reviews was to summarize the evidence on ba...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Garcia, Leandro, Mendonça, Gerfeson, Benedetti, Tânia R. Bertoldo, Borges, Lucélia Justino, Streit, Inês Amanda, Christofoletti, Marina, Silva-Júnior, Fernando Lopes e, Papini, Camila Bosquiero, Binotto, Maria Angélica
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9598005/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36289461
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-14385-1
_version_ 1784816226375041024
author Garcia, Leandro
Mendonça, Gerfeson
Benedetti, Tânia R. Bertoldo
Borges, Lucélia Justino
Streit, Inês Amanda
Christofoletti, Marina
Silva-Júnior, Fernando Lopes e
Papini, Camila Bosquiero
Binotto, Maria Angélica
author_facet Garcia, Leandro
Mendonça, Gerfeson
Benedetti, Tânia R. Bertoldo
Borges, Lucélia Justino
Streit, Inês Amanda
Christofoletti, Marina
Silva-Júnior, Fernando Lopes e
Papini, Camila Bosquiero
Binotto, Maria Angélica
author_sort Garcia, Leandro
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Knowing what facilitates and hinders physical activity behaviour across domains (leisure, travel, work or education, and household) is central for the development of actions for more active lifestyles. Thus, the aim of this systematic review of reviews was to summarize the evidence on barriers and facilitators of domain-specific physical activity. METHODS: We included systematic reviews with or without meta-analysis that investigated the association between modifiable barriers and facilitators and levels of domain-specific physical activity. Reviews published until September 2020 were retrieved from PubMed, ISI Web of Science, Scopus, Regional Library of Medicine (BIREME), and PsycNET, and from the reference list of selected articles. Each review was screened by two independent reviewers for eligibility. Data extracted from selected papers included methodological aspects (number of primary studies, study designs, and age groups); physical activity domains and barriers and facilitators investigated; and direction of association. For each pair of barrier/facilitator and domain-specific physical activity, we recorded the number of positive, negative, and null associations reported across reviews. Quality assessment of each systematic review was performed using the AMSTAR-2 tool. RESULTS: Forty-four systematic reviews were selected. The evidence base was largest for leisure-time followed by travel-related physical activity. A very small number of reviews included physical activity in work, educational and domestic settings. Across all physical activity domains, factors related to the built environment were more abundant in the reviews than intra and interpersonal factors. Very consistent positive associations were observed between a range of intrapersonal factors and leisure-time physical activity, as well as moderately consistent evidence of positive association for general social support and support from family members. Evidence of moderate consistency was found for the positive association between transport-related physical activity and positive beliefs about consequences, walkability, and existence of facilities that support active travel. Evidence on barriers and facilitators for physical activity at work, educational, and domestic settings was limited in volume and consistency. CONCLUSIONS: Efforts and resources are required to diversify and strength the evidence base on barriers and facilitators of domain-specific physical activity, as it is still limited and biased towards the leisure domain and built environment factors. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42020209710. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-022-14385-1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9598005
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95980052022-10-27 Barriers and facilitators of domain-specific physical activity: a systematic review of reviews Garcia, Leandro Mendonça, Gerfeson Benedetti, Tânia R. Bertoldo Borges, Lucélia Justino Streit, Inês Amanda Christofoletti, Marina Silva-Júnior, Fernando Lopes e Papini, Camila Bosquiero Binotto, Maria Angélica BMC Public Health Research BACKGROUND: Knowing what facilitates and hinders physical activity behaviour across domains (leisure, travel, work or education, and household) is central for the development of actions for more active lifestyles. Thus, the aim of this systematic review of reviews was to summarize the evidence on barriers and facilitators of domain-specific physical activity. METHODS: We included systematic reviews with or without meta-analysis that investigated the association between modifiable barriers and facilitators and levels of domain-specific physical activity. Reviews published until September 2020 were retrieved from PubMed, ISI Web of Science, Scopus, Regional Library of Medicine (BIREME), and PsycNET, and from the reference list of selected articles. Each review was screened by two independent reviewers for eligibility. Data extracted from selected papers included methodological aspects (number of primary studies, study designs, and age groups); physical activity domains and barriers and facilitators investigated; and direction of association. For each pair of barrier/facilitator and domain-specific physical activity, we recorded the number of positive, negative, and null associations reported across reviews. Quality assessment of each systematic review was performed using the AMSTAR-2 tool. RESULTS: Forty-four systematic reviews were selected. The evidence base was largest for leisure-time followed by travel-related physical activity. A very small number of reviews included physical activity in work, educational and domestic settings. Across all physical activity domains, factors related to the built environment were more abundant in the reviews than intra and interpersonal factors. Very consistent positive associations were observed between a range of intrapersonal factors and leisure-time physical activity, as well as moderately consistent evidence of positive association for general social support and support from family members. Evidence of moderate consistency was found for the positive association between transport-related physical activity and positive beliefs about consequences, walkability, and existence of facilities that support active travel. Evidence on barriers and facilitators for physical activity at work, educational, and domestic settings was limited in volume and consistency. CONCLUSIONS: Efforts and resources are required to diversify and strength the evidence base on barriers and facilitators of domain-specific physical activity, as it is still limited and biased towards the leisure domain and built environment factors. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42020209710. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-022-14385-1. BioMed Central 2022-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9598005/ /pubmed/36289461 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-14385-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Garcia, Leandro
Mendonça, Gerfeson
Benedetti, Tânia R. Bertoldo
Borges, Lucélia Justino
Streit, Inês Amanda
Christofoletti, Marina
Silva-Júnior, Fernando Lopes e
Papini, Camila Bosquiero
Binotto, Maria Angélica
Barriers and facilitators of domain-specific physical activity: a systematic review of reviews
title Barriers and facilitators of domain-specific physical activity: a systematic review of reviews
title_full Barriers and facilitators of domain-specific physical activity: a systematic review of reviews
title_fullStr Barriers and facilitators of domain-specific physical activity: a systematic review of reviews
title_full_unstemmed Barriers and facilitators of domain-specific physical activity: a systematic review of reviews
title_short Barriers and facilitators of domain-specific physical activity: a systematic review of reviews
title_sort barriers and facilitators of domain-specific physical activity: a systematic review of reviews
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9598005/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36289461
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-14385-1
work_keys_str_mv AT garcialeandro barriersandfacilitatorsofdomainspecificphysicalactivityasystematicreviewofreviews
AT mendoncagerfeson barriersandfacilitatorsofdomainspecificphysicalactivityasystematicreviewofreviews
AT benedettitaniarbertoldo barriersandfacilitatorsofdomainspecificphysicalactivityasystematicreviewofreviews
AT borgesluceliajustino barriersandfacilitatorsofdomainspecificphysicalactivityasystematicreviewofreviews
AT streitinesamanda barriersandfacilitatorsofdomainspecificphysicalactivityasystematicreviewofreviews
AT christofolettimarina barriersandfacilitatorsofdomainspecificphysicalactivityasystematicreviewofreviews
AT silvajuniorfernandolopese barriersandfacilitatorsofdomainspecificphysicalactivityasystematicreviewofreviews
AT papinicamilabosquiero barriersandfacilitatorsofdomainspecificphysicalactivityasystematicreviewofreviews
AT binottomariaangelica barriersandfacilitatorsofdomainspecificphysicalactivityasystematicreviewofreviews