Cargando…
Evaluating the Short-term Environmental and Clinical Effects of a Radiation Oncology Department's Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic
PURPOSE: During the COVID-19 pandemic, many radiation oncology departments worldwide adopted the use of shorter and more intense hypofractionated regimens. Hospital foot traffic was reduced through virtual care. This study's primary objective was to assess the collective environmental effect of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9598491/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36309074 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.04.054 |
_version_ | 1784816347324088320 |
---|---|
author | Cheung, Ronald Ito, Emma Lopez, Marianela Rubinstein, Ed Keller, Harald Cheung, Fred Liu, Zhihui Amy Liu, Fei-Fei Wong, Philip |
author_facet | Cheung, Ronald Ito, Emma Lopez, Marianela Rubinstein, Ed Keller, Harald Cheung, Fred Liu, Zhihui Amy Liu, Fei-Fei Wong, Philip |
author_sort | Cheung, Ronald |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: During the COVID-19 pandemic, many radiation oncology departments worldwide adopted the use of shorter and more intense hypofractionated regimens. Hospital foot traffic was reduced through virtual care. This study's primary objective was to assess the collective environmental effect of these strategic changes by identifying sources of carbon dioxide equivalents (CO(2)e). The rate of radiation-related adverse events from the increased use of hypofractionated treatments was assessed. METHODS AND MATERIALS: All patients treated with external beam radiation therapy from April 1, 2019, to March 31, 2021, at our single institution were identified (n = 10,175) along with their radiation therapy visits (176,423 fractions) and unplanned visits to the radiation nursing clinic or emergency department. Out-patient hospital and virtual visits (n = 75,853) during this same period were also analyzed. Environmental effect measures, including linear accelerator power usage, patient travel distances, and personal protection equipment consumption were all converted into CO(2)e. RESULTS: The use of curative hypofractionated regimens increased from 17% to 27% during the pandemic year. Carbon footprint was reduced by 39% during the pandemic year (1,332,388 kg CO(2)e) compared with the prepandemic year (2,024,823 kg CO(2)e). Comparing patients in the prepandemic versus pandemic year, there was a significant reduction in the proportion of hypofractionated patients who needed a visit to either the radiation nursing clinic (39% vs 25%; P < .001) or emergency department (6% vs 2%; P < .001) during and within 90 days of radiation therapy. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to demonstrate the environmental benefits of increased use of hypofractionated regimens and virtual care, while assuring that there was no added acute radiation-related adverse event. Our findings support their continued use as one of many long-term strategies to reduce the environmental footprint of health care delivery. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9598491 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Elsevier Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95984912022-10-26 Evaluating the Short-term Environmental and Clinical Effects of a Radiation Oncology Department's Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic Cheung, Ronald Ito, Emma Lopez, Marianela Rubinstein, Ed Keller, Harald Cheung, Fred Liu, Zhihui Amy Liu, Fei-Fei Wong, Philip Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Clinical Investigation PURPOSE: During the COVID-19 pandemic, many radiation oncology departments worldwide adopted the use of shorter and more intense hypofractionated regimens. Hospital foot traffic was reduced through virtual care. This study's primary objective was to assess the collective environmental effect of these strategic changes by identifying sources of carbon dioxide equivalents (CO(2)e). The rate of radiation-related adverse events from the increased use of hypofractionated treatments was assessed. METHODS AND MATERIALS: All patients treated with external beam radiation therapy from April 1, 2019, to March 31, 2021, at our single institution were identified (n = 10,175) along with their radiation therapy visits (176,423 fractions) and unplanned visits to the radiation nursing clinic or emergency department. Out-patient hospital and virtual visits (n = 75,853) during this same period were also analyzed. Environmental effect measures, including linear accelerator power usage, patient travel distances, and personal protection equipment consumption were all converted into CO(2)e. RESULTS: The use of curative hypofractionated regimens increased from 17% to 27% during the pandemic year. Carbon footprint was reduced by 39% during the pandemic year (1,332,388 kg CO(2)e) compared with the prepandemic year (2,024,823 kg CO(2)e). Comparing patients in the prepandemic versus pandemic year, there was a significant reduction in the proportion of hypofractionated patients who needed a visit to either the radiation nursing clinic (39% vs 25%; P < .001) or emergency department (6% vs 2%; P < .001) during and within 90 days of radiation therapy. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to demonstrate the environmental benefits of increased use of hypofractionated regimens and virtual care, while assuring that there was no added acute radiation-related adverse event. Our findings support their continued use as one of many long-term strategies to reduce the environmental footprint of health care delivery. Elsevier Inc. 2023-01-01 2022-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9598491/ /pubmed/36309074 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.04.054 Text en © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Investigation Cheung, Ronald Ito, Emma Lopez, Marianela Rubinstein, Ed Keller, Harald Cheung, Fred Liu, Zhihui Amy Liu, Fei-Fei Wong, Philip Evaluating the Short-term Environmental and Clinical Effects of a Radiation Oncology Department's Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic |
title | Evaluating the Short-term Environmental and Clinical Effects of a Radiation Oncology Department's Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic |
title_full | Evaluating the Short-term Environmental and Clinical Effects of a Radiation Oncology Department's Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic |
title_fullStr | Evaluating the Short-term Environmental and Clinical Effects of a Radiation Oncology Department's Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating the Short-term Environmental and Clinical Effects of a Radiation Oncology Department's Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic |
title_short | Evaluating the Short-term Environmental and Clinical Effects of a Radiation Oncology Department's Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic |
title_sort | evaluating the short-term environmental and clinical effects of a radiation oncology department's response to the covid-19 pandemic |
topic | Clinical Investigation |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9598491/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36309074 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.04.054 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cheungronald evaluatingtheshorttermenvironmentalandclinicaleffectsofaradiationoncologydepartmentsresponsetothecovid19pandemic AT itoemma evaluatingtheshorttermenvironmentalandclinicaleffectsofaradiationoncologydepartmentsresponsetothecovid19pandemic AT lopezmarianela evaluatingtheshorttermenvironmentalandclinicaleffectsofaradiationoncologydepartmentsresponsetothecovid19pandemic AT rubinsteined evaluatingtheshorttermenvironmentalandclinicaleffectsofaradiationoncologydepartmentsresponsetothecovid19pandemic AT kellerharald evaluatingtheshorttermenvironmentalandclinicaleffectsofaradiationoncologydepartmentsresponsetothecovid19pandemic AT cheungfred evaluatingtheshorttermenvironmentalandclinicaleffectsofaradiationoncologydepartmentsresponsetothecovid19pandemic AT liuzhihuiamy evaluatingtheshorttermenvironmentalandclinicaleffectsofaradiationoncologydepartmentsresponsetothecovid19pandemic AT liufeifei evaluatingtheshorttermenvironmentalandclinicaleffectsofaradiationoncologydepartmentsresponsetothecovid19pandemic AT wongphilip evaluatingtheshorttermenvironmentalandclinicaleffectsofaradiationoncologydepartmentsresponsetothecovid19pandemic |