Cargando…

Evaluating the Short-term Environmental and Clinical Effects of a Radiation Oncology Department's Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic

PURPOSE: During the COVID-19 pandemic, many radiation oncology departments worldwide adopted the use of shorter and more intense hypofractionated regimens. Hospital foot traffic was reduced through virtual care. This study's primary objective was to assess the collective environmental effect of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cheung, Ronald, Ito, Emma, Lopez, Marianela, Rubinstein, Ed, Keller, Harald, Cheung, Fred, Liu, Zhihui Amy, Liu, Fei-Fei, Wong, Philip
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9598491/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36309074
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.04.054
_version_ 1784816347324088320
author Cheung, Ronald
Ito, Emma
Lopez, Marianela
Rubinstein, Ed
Keller, Harald
Cheung, Fred
Liu, Zhihui Amy
Liu, Fei-Fei
Wong, Philip
author_facet Cheung, Ronald
Ito, Emma
Lopez, Marianela
Rubinstein, Ed
Keller, Harald
Cheung, Fred
Liu, Zhihui Amy
Liu, Fei-Fei
Wong, Philip
author_sort Cheung, Ronald
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: During the COVID-19 pandemic, many radiation oncology departments worldwide adopted the use of shorter and more intense hypofractionated regimens. Hospital foot traffic was reduced through virtual care. This study's primary objective was to assess the collective environmental effect of these strategic changes by identifying sources of carbon dioxide equivalents (CO(2)e). The rate of radiation-related adverse events from the increased use of hypofractionated treatments was assessed. METHODS AND MATERIALS: All patients treated with external beam radiation therapy from April 1, 2019, to March 31, 2021, at our single institution were identified (n = 10,175) along with their radiation therapy visits (176,423 fractions) and unplanned visits to the radiation nursing clinic or emergency department. Out-patient hospital and virtual visits (n = 75,853) during this same period were also analyzed. Environmental effect measures, including linear accelerator power usage, patient travel distances, and personal protection equipment consumption were all converted into CO(2)e. RESULTS: The use of curative hypofractionated regimens increased from 17% to 27% during the pandemic year. Carbon footprint was reduced by 39% during the pandemic year (1,332,388 kg CO(2)e) compared with the prepandemic year (2,024,823 kg CO(2)e). Comparing patients in the prepandemic versus pandemic year, there was a significant reduction in the proportion of hypofractionated patients who needed a visit to either the radiation nursing clinic (39% vs 25%; P < .001) or emergency department (6% vs 2%; P < .001) during and within 90 days of radiation therapy. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to demonstrate the environmental benefits of increased use of hypofractionated regimens and virtual care, while assuring that there was no added acute radiation-related adverse event. Our findings support their continued use as one of many long-term strategies to reduce the environmental footprint of health care delivery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9598491
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95984912022-10-26 Evaluating the Short-term Environmental and Clinical Effects of a Radiation Oncology Department's Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic Cheung, Ronald Ito, Emma Lopez, Marianela Rubinstein, Ed Keller, Harald Cheung, Fred Liu, Zhihui Amy Liu, Fei-Fei Wong, Philip Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Clinical Investigation PURPOSE: During the COVID-19 pandemic, many radiation oncology departments worldwide adopted the use of shorter and more intense hypofractionated regimens. Hospital foot traffic was reduced through virtual care. This study's primary objective was to assess the collective environmental effect of these strategic changes by identifying sources of carbon dioxide equivalents (CO(2)e). The rate of radiation-related adverse events from the increased use of hypofractionated treatments was assessed. METHODS AND MATERIALS: All patients treated with external beam radiation therapy from April 1, 2019, to March 31, 2021, at our single institution were identified (n = 10,175) along with their radiation therapy visits (176,423 fractions) and unplanned visits to the radiation nursing clinic or emergency department. Out-patient hospital and virtual visits (n = 75,853) during this same period were also analyzed. Environmental effect measures, including linear accelerator power usage, patient travel distances, and personal protection equipment consumption were all converted into CO(2)e. RESULTS: The use of curative hypofractionated regimens increased from 17% to 27% during the pandemic year. Carbon footprint was reduced by 39% during the pandemic year (1,332,388 kg CO(2)e) compared with the prepandemic year (2,024,823 kg CO(2)e). Comparing patients in the prepandemic versus pandemic year, there was a significant reduction in the proportion of hypofractionated patients who needed a visit to either the radiation nursing clinic (39% vs 25%; P < .001) or emergency department (6% vs 2%; P < .001) during and within 90 days of radiation therapy. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to demonstrate the environmental benefits of increased use of hypofractionated regimens and virtual care, while assuring that there was no added acute radiation-related adverse event. Our findings support their continued use as one of many long-term strategies to reduce the environmental footprint of health care delivery. Elsevier Inc. 2023-01-01 2022-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9598491/ /pubmed/36309074 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.04.054 Text en © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Clinical Investigation
Cheung, Ronald
Ito, Emma
Lopez, Marianela
Rubinstein, Ed
Keller, Harald
Cheung, Fred
Liu, Zhihui Amy
Liu, Fei-Fei
Wong, Philip
Evaluating the Short-term Environmental and Clinical Effects of a Radiation Oncology Department's Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic
title Evaluating the Short-term Environmental and Clinical Effects of a Radiation Oncology Department's Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic
title_full Evaluating the Short-term Environmental and Clinical Effects of a Radiation Oncology Department's Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic
title_fullStr Evaluating the Short-term Environmental and Clinical Effects of a Radiation Oncology Department's Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the Short-term Environmental and Clinical Effects of a Radiation Oncology Department's Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic
title_short Evaluating the Short-term Environmental and Clinical Effects of a Radiation Oncology Department's Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic
title_sort evaluating the short-term environmental and clinical effects of a radiation oncology department's response to the covid-19 pandemic
topic Clinical Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9598491/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36309074
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.04.054
work_keys_str_mv AT cheungronald evaluatingtheshorttermenvironmentalandclinicaleffectsofaradiationoncologydepartmentsresponsetothecovid19pandemic
AT itoemma evaluatingtheshorttermenvironmentalandclinicaleffectsofaradiationoncologydepartmentsresponsetothecovid19pandemic
AT lopezmarianela evaluatingtheshorttermenvironmentalandclinicaleffectsofaradiationoncologydepartmentsresponsetothecovid19pandemic
AT rubinsteined evaluatingtheshorttermenvironmentalandclinicaleffectsofaradiationoncologydepartmentsresponsetothecovid19pandemic
AT kellerharald evaluatingtheshorttermenvironmentalandclinicaleffectsofaradiationoncologydepartmentsresponsetothecovid19pandemic
AT cheungfred evaluatingtheshorttermenvironmentalandclinicaleffectsofaradiationoncologydepartmentsresponsetothecovid19pandemic
AT liuzhihuiamy evaluatingtheshorttermenvironmentalandclinicaleffectsofaradiationoncologydepartmentsresponsetothecovid19pandemic
AT liufeifei evaluatingtheshorttermenvironmentalandclinicaleffectsofaradiationoncologydepartmentsresponsetothecovid19pandemic
AT wongphilip evaluatingtheshorttermenvironmentalandclinicaleffectsofaradiationoncologydepartmentsresponsetothecovid19pandemic