Cargando…

Lack of clinical evidence of antiviral therapy for human monkeypox: A scoping review

Since May 2022, many human monkeypox cases have been reported from non-endemic countries. This systematic review aimed to evaluate and summarize the existing research on the efficacy and safety of tecovirimat, brincidofovir, and cidofovir for patients with monkeypox. We searched studies that reporte...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kuroda, Naoto, Shimizu, Tadashi, Hirano, Daishi, Ishikane, Masahiro, Kataoka, Yuki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Japanese Society of Chemotherapy, Japanese Association for Infectious Diseases, and Japanese Society for Infection Prevention and Control. Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9598785/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36283609
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jiac.2022.10.009
_version_ 1784816437452341248
author Kuroda, Naoto
Shimizu, Tadashi
Hirano, Daishi
Ishikane, Masahiro
Kataoka, Yuki
author_facet Kuroda, Naoto
Shimizu, Tadashi
Hirano, Daishi
Ishikane, Masahiro
Kataoka, Yuki
author_sort Kuroda, Naoto
collection PubMed
description Since May 2022, many human monkeypox cases have been reported from non-endemic countries. This systematic review aimed to evaluate and summarize the existing research on the efficacy and safety of tecovirimat, brincidofovir, and cidofovir for patients with monkeypox. We searched studies that reported the efficacy and adverse events of tecovirimat, brincidofovir, or cidofovir for patients with human monkeypox in several databases including preprint servers. Only five studies were included. The efficacy and adverse events were assessed in only five and four patients, respectively. Regarding tecovirimat, all two patients recovered from monkeypox. One had no adverse event and the other has no description of an adverse event. Regarding brincidofovir, all three patients recovered from monkeypox but all of them had increased alanine transaminase, and one had nausea and abdominal discomfort. There was no study on treatment with cidofovir. Based on past studies and our results, tecovirimat might be the best choice due to ease of administration (oral drug), fewer side effects, and past treatment results for human monkeypox administration. However, very few studies were included in this scoping review. Therefore, further studies are needed to assess their efficacy and safety as possible treatments for human monkeypox.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9598785
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Japanese Society of Chemotherapy, Japanese Association for Infectious Diseases, and Japanese Society for Infection Prevention and Control. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95987852022-10-28 Lack of clinical evidence of antiviral therapy for human monkeypox: A scoping review Kuroda, Naoto Shimizu, Tadashi Hirano, Daishi Ishikane, Masahiro Kataoka, Yuki J Infect Chemother Note Since May 2022, many human monkeypox cases have been reported from non-endemic countries. This systematic review aimed to evaluate and summarize the existing research on the efficacy and safety of tecovirimat, brincidofovir, and cidofovir for patients with monkeypox. We searched studies that reported the efficacy and adverse events of tecovirimat, brincidofovir, or cidofovir for patients with human monkeypox in several databases including preprint servers. Only five studies were included. The efficacy and adverse events were assessed in only five and four patients, respectively. Regarding tecovirimat, all two patients recovered from monkeypox. One had no adverse event and the other has no description of an adverse event. Regarding brincidofovir, all three patients recovered from monkeypox but all of them had increased alanine transaminase, and one had nausea and abdominal discomfort. There was no study on treatment with cidofovir. Based on past studies and our results, tecovirimat might be the best choice due to ease of administration (oral drug), fewer side effects, and past treatment results for human monkeypox administration. However, very few studies were included in this scoping review. Therefore, further studies are needed to assess their efficacy and safety as possible treatments for human monkeypox. Japanese Society of Chemotherapy, Japanese Association for Infectious Diseases, and Japanese Society for Infection Prevention and Control. Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2023-02 2022-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9598785/ /pubmed/36283609 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jiac.2022.10.009 Text en © 2023 Japanese Society of Chemotherapy, Japanese Association for Infectious Diseases, and Japanese Society for Infection Prevention and Control. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Elsevier has created a Monkeypox Information Center (https://www.elsevier.com/connect/monkeypox-information-center) in response to the declared public health emergency of international concern, with free information in English on the monkeypox virus. The Monkeypox Information Center is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its monkeypox related research that is available on the Monkeypox Information Center - including this research content - immediately available in publicly funded repositories, with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the Monkeypox Information Center remains active.
spellingShingle Note
Kuroda, Naoto
Shimizu, Tadashi
Hirano, Daishi
Ishikane, Masahiro
Kataoka, Yuki
Lack of clinical evidence of antiviral therapy for human monkeypox: A scoping review
title Lack of clinical evidence of antiviral therapy for human monkeypox: A scoping review
title_full Lack of clinical evidence of antiviral therapy for human monkeypox: A scoping review
title_fullStr Lack of clinical evidence of antiviral therapy for human monkeypox: A scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Lack of clinical evidence of antiviral therapy for human monkeypox: A scoping review
title_short Lack of clinical evidence of antiviral therapy for human monkeypox: A scoping review
title_sort lack of clinical evidence of antiviral therapy for human monkeypox: a scoping review
topic Note
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9598785/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36283609
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jiac.2022.10.009
work_keys_str_mv AT kurodanaoto lackofclinicalevidenceofantiviraltherapyforhumanmonkeypoxascopingreview
AT shimizutadashi lackofclinicalevidenceofantiviraltherapyforhumanmonkeypoxascopingreview
AT hiranodaishi lackofclinicalevidenceofantiviraltherapyforhumanmonkeypoxascopingreview
AT ishikanemasahiro lackofclinicalevidenceofantiviraltherapyforhumanmonkeypoxascopingreview
AT kataokayuki lackofclinicalevidenceofantiviraltherapyforhumanmonkeypoxascopingreview