Cargando…

Comparison between Ceftriaxone and Sulbactam-Ampicillin as Initial Treatment of Community-Acquired Pneumonia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Current guidelines recommend the use of ceftriaxone and sulbactam-ampicillin for the initial treatment of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). However, there are no clear data on these guidelines. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the effectiveness of ceftriaxone an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kato, Hideo, Hagihara, Mao, Asai, Nobuhiro, Hirai, Jun, Yamagishi, Yuka, Iwamoto, Takuya, Mikamo, Hiroshige
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9598877/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36289949
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11101291
_version_ 1784816456835268608
author Kato, Hideo
Hagihara, Mao
Asai, Nobuhiro
Hirai, Jun
Yamagishi, Yuka
Iwamoto, Takuya
Mikamo, Hiroshige
author_facet Kato, Hideo
Hagihara, Mao
Asai, Nobuhiro
Hirai, Jun
Yamagishi, Yuka
Iwamoto, Takuya
Mikamo, Hiroshige
author_sort Kato, Hideo
collection PubMed
description Current guidelines recommend the use of ceftriaxone and sulbactam-ampicillin for the initial treatment of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). However, there are no clear data on these guidelines. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the effectiveness of ceftriaxone and sulbactam-ampicillin in the initial treatment of CAP. The Embase, Scopus, PubMed, Ichushi, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature databases were systematically searched from inception to July 2022. The studies included patients who received ceftriaxone or sulbactam-ampicillin as the initial antibiotic therapy for CAP. The mortality and clinical cure rates were evaluated. Of the 2152 citations identified for screening, four studies were included. Results of the pooled analysis indicated no significant differences in the mortality and clinical cure rates between patients treated with ceftriaxone and those treated with sulbactam-ampicillin (mortality, odds ratio [OR]: 1.85, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.57–5.96; clinical cure rate, OR: 1.08, 95% CI: 0.18–6.44). This study supports the guidelines for CAP treatment, though further studies are needed to obtain a deeper understanding.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9598877
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95988772022-10-27 Comparison between Ceftriaxone and Sulbactam-Ampicillin as Initial Treatment of Community-Acquired Pneumonia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Kato, Hideo Hagihara, Mao Asai, Nobuhiro Hirai, Jun Yamagishi, Yuka Iwamoto, Takuya Mikamo, Hiroshige Antibiotics (Basel) Article Current guidelines recommend the use of ceftriaxone and sulbactam-ampicillin for the initial treatment of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). However, there are no clear data on these guidelines. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the effectiveness of ceftriaxone and sulbactam-ampicillin in the initial treatment of CAP. The Embase, Scopus, PubMed, Ichushi, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature databases were systematically searched from inception to July 2022. The studies included patients who received ceftriaxone or sulbactam-ampicillin as the initial antibiotic therapy for CAP. The mortality and clinical cure rates were evaluated. Of the 2152 citations identified for screening, four studies were included. Results of the pooled analysis indicated no significant differences in the mortality and clinical cure rates between patients treated with ceftriaxone and those treated with sulbactam-ampicillin (mortality, odds ratio [OR]: 1.85, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.57–5.96; clinical cure rate, OR: 1.08, 95% CI: 0.18–6.44). This study supports the guidelines for CAP treatment, though further studies are needed to obtain a deeper understanding. MDPI 2022-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9598877/ /pubmed/36289949 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11101291 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Kato, Hideo
Hagihara, Mao
Asai, Nobuhiro
Hirai, Jun
Yamagishi, Yuka
Iwamoto, Takuya
Mikamo, Hiroshige
Comparison between Ceftriaxone and Sulbactam-Ampicillin as Initial Treatment of Community-Acquired Pneumonia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title Comparison between Ceftriaxone and Sulbactam-Ampicillin as Initial Treatment of Community-Acquired Pneumonia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Comparison between Ceftriaxone and Sulbactam-Ampicillin as Initial Treatment of Community-Acquired Pneumonia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Comparison between Ceftriaxone and Sulbactam-Ampicillin as Initial Treatment of Community-Acquired Pneumonia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between Ceftriaxone and Sulbactam-Ampicillin as Initial Treatment of Community-Acquired Pneumonia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Comparison between Ceftriaxone and Sulbactam-Ampicillin as Initial Treatment of Community-Acquired Pneumonia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort comparison between ceftriaxone and sulbactam-ampicillin as initial treatment of community-acquired pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9598877/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36289949
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11101291
work_keys_str_mv AT katohideo comparisonbetweenceftriaxoneandsulbactamampicillinasinitialtreatmentofcommunityacquiredpneumoniaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hagiharamao comparisonbetweenceftriaxoneandsulbactamampicillinasinitialtreatmentofcommunityacquiredpneumoniaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT asainobuhiro comparisonbetweenceftriaxoneandsulbactamampicillinasinitialtreatmentofcommunityacquiredpneumoniaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hiraijun comparisonbetweenceftriaxoneandsulbactamampicillinasinitialtreatmentofcommunityacquiredpneumoniaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yamagishiyuka comparisonbetweenceftriaxoneandsulbactamampicillinasinitialtreatmentofcommunityacquiredpneumoniaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT iwamototakuya comparisonbetweenceftriaxoneandsulbactamampicillinasinitialtreatmentofcommunityacquiredpneumoniaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT mikamohiroshige comparisonbetweenceftriaxoneandsulbactamampicillinasinitialtreatmentofcommunityacquiredpneumoniaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis