Cargando…

Comparison of Cortical Bone Fracture Patterns Under Compression Loading Using Finite Element–Discrete Element Numerical Modeling Approach and Destructive Testing

Finite element analysis may not be the only method by which bone fracture initiation and propagation may be analyzed. This study compares fracture patterns generated from compression testing of bone to fracture patterns generated using a combination of both the finite element method (FEM) and discre...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hudyma, Nick, Lisjak, Andrea, Tatone, Bryan S, Garner, Hillary W, Wight, Jeffrey, Mandavalli, Akhil S, Olutola, Ifeloluwa A, Pujalte, George G. A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9599044/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36321046
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.29596
_version_ 1784816498446958592
author Hudyma, Nick
Lisjak, Andrea
Tatone, Bryan S
Garner, Hillary W
Wight, Jeffrey
Mandavalli, Akhil S
Olutola, Ifeloluwa A
Pujalte, George G. A
author_facet Hudyma, Nick
Lisjak, Andrea
Tatone, Bryan S
Garner, Hillary W
Wight, Jeffrey
Mandavalli, Akhil S
Olutola, Ifeloluwa A
Pujalte, George G. A
author_sort Hudyma, Nick
collection PubMed
description Finite element analysis may not be the only method by which bone fracture initiation and propagation may be analyzed. This study compares fracture patterns generated from compression testing of bone to fracture patterns generated using a combination of both the finite element method (FEM) and discrete element method (DEM) as defined by the finite discrete element method (FDEM). Before testing, a three-dimensional bone model was developed using CT. Force and displacement data were collected during testing. The tested specimen was reimaged using CT. The solid model was discretized and material properties adjusted such that finite element-discrete element macro behavior matched the force-displacement data. A qualitative comparison of the fracture patterns demonstrates that FDEM can successfully be used to simulate and predict fracturing in bone, with this study representing the first time this has been done and reported.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9599044
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95990442022-10-31 Comparison of Cortical Bone Fracture Patterns Under Compression Loading Using Finite Element–Discrete Element Numerical Modeling Approach and Destructive Testing Hudyma, Nick Lisjak, Andrea Tatone, Bryan S Garner, Hillary W Wight, Jeffrey Mandavalli, Akhil S Olutola, Ifeloluwa A Pujalte, George G. A Cureus Medical Physics Finite element analysis may not be the only method by which bone fracture initiation and propagation may be analyzed. This study compares fracture patterns generated from compression testing of bone to fracture patterns generated using a combination of both the finite element method (FEM) and discrete element method (DEM) as defined by the finite discrete element method (FDEM). Before testing, a three-dimensional bone model was developed using CT. Force and displacement data were collected during testing. The tested specimen was reimaged using CT. The solid model was discretized and material properties adjusted such that finite element-discrete element macro behavior matched the force-displacement data. A qualitative comparison of the fracture patterns demonstrates that FDEM can successfully be used to simulate and predict fracturing in bone, with this study representing the first time this has been done and reported. Cureus 2022-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9599044/ /pubmed/36321046 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.29596 Text en Copyright © 2022, Hudyma et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Medical Physics
Hudyma, Nick
Lisjak, Andrea
Tatone, Bryan S
Garner, Hillary W
Wight, Jeffrey
Mandavalli, Akhil S
Olutola, Ifeloluwa A
Pujalte, George G. A
Comparison of Cortical Bone Fracture Patterns Under Compression Loading Using Finite Element–Discrete Element Numerical Modeling Approach and Destructive Testing
title Comparison of Cortical Bone Fracture Patterns Under Compression Loading Using Finite Element–Discrete Element Numerical Modeling Approach and Destructive Testing
title_full Comparison of Cortical Bone Fracture Patterns Under Compression Loading Using Finite Element–Discrete Element Numerical Modeling Approach and Destructive Testing
title_fullStr Comparison of Cortical Bone Fracture Patterns Under Compression Loading Using Finite Element–Discrete Element Numerical Modeling Approach and Destructive Testing
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Cortical Bone Fracture Patterns Under Compression Loading Using Finite Element–Discrete Element Numerical Modeling Approach and Destructive Testing
title_short Comparison of Cortical Bone Fracture Patterns Under Compression Loading Using Finite Element–Discrete Element Numerical Modeling Approach and Destructive Testing
title_sort comparison of cortical bone fracture patterns under compression loading using finite element–discrete element numerical modeling approach and destructive testing
topic Medical Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9599044/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36321046
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.29596
work_keys_str_mv AT hudymanick comparisonofcorticalbonefracturepatternsundercompressionloadingusingfiniteelementdiscreteelementnumericalmodelingapproachanddestructivetesting
AT lisjakandrea comparisonofcorticalbonefracturepatternsundercompressionloadingusingfiniteelementdiscreteelementnumericalmodelingapproachanddestructivetesting
AT tatonebryans comparisonofcorticalbonefracturepatternsundercompressionloadingusingfiniteelementdiscreteelementnumericalmodelingapproachanddestructivetesting
AT garnerhillaryw comparisonofcorticalbonefracturepatternsundercompressionloadingusingfiniteelementdiscreteelementnumericalmodelingapproachanddestructivetesting
AT wightjeffrey comparisonofcorticalbonefracturepatternsundercompressionloadingusingfiniteelementdiscreteelementnumericalmodelingapproachanddestructivetesting
AT mandavalliakhils comparisonofcorticalbonefracturepatternsundercompressionloadingusingfiniteelementdiscreteelementnumericalmodelingapproachanddestructivetesting
AT olutolaifeloluwaa comparisonofcorticalbonefracturepatternsundercompressionloadingusingfiniteelementdiscreteelementnumericalmodelingapproachanddestructivetesting
AT pujaltegeorgega comparisonofcorticalbonefracturepatternsundercompressionloadingusingfiniteelementdiscreteelementnumericalmodelingapproachanddestructivetesting