Cargando…

Does a High-Risk (>1/50) Result for First-Trimester Combined Screening Always Entail Invasive Testing? Which Patients from This Group Might Benefit from cfDNA Testing?

Currently, cell-free DNA (cfDNA) is offered as part of a contingent screening for patients with a first-trimester combined test (FCT) risk between 1/50 and 1/250. However, most aneuploidies are within the group of patients with a risk above 1/10. An observational, retrospective, and multi-centric st...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: García-Jiménez, Rocío, Valero, Irene, Corrales-Gutiérrez, Isabel, Granell, Reyes, Borrero, Carlota, Sainz-Bueno, José Antonio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9599393/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36289845
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10102579
_version_ 1784816583194968064
author García-Jiménez, Rocío
Valero, Irene
Corrales-Gutiérrez, Isabel
Granell, Reyes
Borrero, Carlota
Sainz-Bueno, José Antonio
author_facet García-Jiménez, Rocío
Valero, Irene
Corrales-Gutiérrez, Isabel
Granell, Reyes
Borrero, Carlota
Sainz-Bueno, José Antonio
author_sort García-Jiménez, Rocío
collection PubMed
description Currently, cell-free DNA (cfDNA) is offered as part of a contingent screening for patients with a first-trimester combined test (FCT) risk between 1/50 and 1/250. However, most aneuploidies are within the group of patients with a risk above 1/10. An observational, retrospective, and multi-centric study was carried out, to evaluate the theorical performance of lowering the cut-off point for the high-risk group from 1/50 to 1/10. Out of the 25,920 patients included, 25,374 (97.9%) consented to the cfDNA contingent screening for aneuploidies. With the proposed strategy, knowing that the detection rate (DR) of cfDNA testing for trisomy 21 is 99.7%, the DR for trisomy 21 would have stayed in a 93.2%, just as it was with the current strategy. In this instance, 267 (1.1%) invasive tests would have been performed, while the current strategy had a total of 307 (1.2%). The false positive rate (FPR) rate would have stayed at 5.2% in both scenarios. In conclusion, the contingent screening of aneuploidies based in the result of the FCT, offering the analysis of cfDNA to patients with an intermediate risk after lowering the cut-off point from 1/50 to 1/10, is a valid alternative that might maintain the current detection rates and avoid the complications associated with invasive testing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9599393
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95993932022-10-27 Does a High-Risk (>1/50) Result for First-Trimester Combined Screening Always Entail Invasive Testing? Which Patients from This Group Might Benefit from cfDNA Testing? García-Jiménez, Rocío Valero, Irene Corrales-Gutiérrez, Isabel Granell, Reyes Borrero, Carlota Sainz-Bueno, José Antonio Biomedicines Article Currently, cell-free DNA (cfDNA) is offered as part of a contingent screening for patients with a first-trimester combined test (FCT) risk between 1/50 and 1/250. However, most aneuploidies are within the group of patients with a risk above 1/10. An observational, retrospective, and multi-centric study was carried out, to evaluate the theorical performance of lowering the cut-off point for the high-risk group from 1/50 to 1/10. Out of the 25,920 patients included, 25,374 (97.9%) consented to the cfDNA contingent screening for aneuploidies. With the proposed strategy, knowing that the detection rate (DR) of cfDNA testing for trisomy 21 is 99.7%, the DR for trisomy 21 would have stayed in a 93.2%, just as it was with the current strategy. In this instance, 267 (1.1%) invasive tests would have been performed, while the current strategy had a total of 307 (1.2%). The false positive rate (FPR) rate would have stayed at 5.2% in both scenarios. In conclusion, the contingent screening of aneuploidies based in the result of the FCT, offering the analysis of cfDNA to patients with an intermediate risk after lowering the cut-off point from 1/50 to 1/10, is a valid alternative that might maintain the current detection rates and avoid the complications associated with invasive testing. MDPI 2022-10-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9599393/ /pubmed/36289845 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10102579 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
García-Jiménez, Rocío
Valero, Irene
Corrales-Gutiérrez, Isabel
Granell, Reyes
Borrero, Carlota
Sainz-Bueno, José Antonio
Does a High-Risk (>1/50) Result for First-Trimester Combined Screening Always Entail Invasive Testing? Which Patients from This Group Might Benefit from cfDNA Testing?
title Does a High-Risk (>1/50) Result for First-Trimester Combined Screening Always Entail Invasive Testing? Which Patients from This Group Might Benefit from cfDNA Testing?
title_full Does a High-Risk (>1/50) Result for First-Trimester Combined Screening Always Entail Invasive Testing? Which Patients from This Group Might Benefit from cfDNA Testing?
title_fullStr Does a High-Risk (>1/50) Result for First-Trimester Combined Screening Always Entail Invasive Testing? Which Patients from This Group Might Benefit from cfDNA Testing?
title_full_unstemmed Does a High-Risk (>1/50) Result for First-Trimester Combined Screening Always Entail Invasive Testing? Which Patients from This Group Might Benefit from cfDNA Testing?
title_short Does a High-Risk (>1/50) Result for First-Trimester Combined Screening Always Entail Invasive Testing? Which Patients from This Group Might Benefit from cfDNA Testing?
title_sort does a high-risk (>1/50) result for first-trimester combined screening always entail invasive testing? which patients from this group might benefit from cfdna testing?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9599393/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36289845
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10102579
work_keys_str_mv AT garciajimenezrocio doesahighrisk150resultforfirsttrimestercombinedscreeningalwaysentailinvasivetestingwhichpatientsfromthisgroupmightbenefitfromcfdnatesting
AT valeroirene doesahighrisk150resultforfirsttrimestercombinedscreeningalwaysentailinvasivetestingwhichpatientsfromthisgroupmightbenefitfromcfdnatesting
AT corralesgutierrezisabel doesahighrisk150resultforfirsttrimestercombinedscreeningalwaysentailinvasivetestingwhichpatientsfromthisgroupmightbenefitfromcfdnatesting
AT granellreyes doesahighrisk150resultforfirsttrimestercombinedscreeningalwaysentailinvasivetestingwhichpatientsfromthisgroupmightbenefitfromcfdnatesting
AT borrerocarlota doesahighrisk150resultforfirsttrimestercombinedscreeningalwaysentailinvasivetestingwhichpatientsfromthisgroupmightbenefitfromcfdnatesting
AT sainzbuenojoseantonio doesahighrisk150resultforfirsttrimestercombinedscreeningalwaysentailinvasivetestingwhichpatientsfromthisgroupmightbenefitfromcfdnatesting