Cargando…
Does a High-Risk (>1/50) Result for First-Trimester Combined Screening Always Entail Invasive Testing? Which Patients from This Group Might Benefit from cfDNA Testing?
Currently, cell-free DNA (cfDNA) is offered as part of a contingent screening for patients with a first-trimester combined test (FCT) risk between 1/50 and 1/250. However, most aneuploidies are within the group of patients with a risk above 1/10. An observational, retrospective, and multi-centric st...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9599393/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36289845 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10102579 |
_version_ | 1784816583194968064 |
---|---|
author | García-Jiménez, Rocío Valero, Irene Corrales-Gutiérrez, Isabel Granell, Reyes Borrero, Carlota Sainz-Bueno, José Antonio |
author_facet | García-Jiménez, Rocío Valero, Irene Corrales-Gutiérrez, Isabel Granell, Reyes Borrero, Carlota Sainz-Bueno, José Antonio |
author_sort | García-Jiménez, Rocío |
collection | PubMed |
description | Currently, cell-free DNA (cfDNA) is offered as part of a contingent screening for patients with a first-trimester combined test (FCT) risk between 1/50 and 1/250. However, most aneuploidies are within the group of patients with a risk above 1/10. An observational, retrospective, and multi-centric study was carried out, to evaluate the theorical performance of lowering the cut-off point for the high-risk group from 1/50 to 1/10. Out of the 25,920 patients included, 25,374 (97.9%) consented to the cfDNA contingent screening for aneuploidies. With the proposed strategy, knowing that the detection rate (DR) of cfDNA testing for trisomy 21 is 99.7%, the DR for trisomy 21 would have stayed in a 93.2%, just as it was with the current strategy. In this instance, 267 (1.1%) invasive tests would have been performed, while the current strategy had a total of 307 (1.2%). The false positive rate (FPR) rate would have stayed at 5.2% in both scenarios. In conclusion, the contingent screening of aneuploidies based in the result of the FCT, offering the analysis of cfDNA to patients with an intermediate risk after lowering the cut-off point from 1/50 to 1/10, is a valid alternative that might maintain the current detection rates and avoid the complications associated with invasive testing. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9599393 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95993932022-10-27 Does a High-Risk (>1/50) Result for First-Trimester Combined Screening Always Entail Invasive Testing? Which Patients from This Group Might Benefit from cfDNA Testing? García-Jiménez, Rocío Valero, Irene Corrales-Gutiérrez, Isabel Granell, Reyes Borrero, Carlota Sainz-Bueno, José Antonio Biomedicines Article Currently, cell-free DNA (cfDNA) is offered as part of a contingent screening for patients with a first-trimester combined test (FCT) risk between 1/50 and 1/250. However, most aneuploidies are within the group of patients with a risk above 1/10. An observational, retrospective, and multi-centric study was carried out, to evaluate the theorical performance of lowering the cut-off point for the high-risk group from 1/50 to 1/10. Out of the 25,920 patients included, 25,374 (97.9%) consented to the cfDNA contingent screening for aneuploidies. With the proposed strategy, knowing that the detection rate (DR) of cfDNA testing for trisomy 21 is 99.7%, the DR for trisomy 21 would have stayed in a 93.2%, just as it was with the current strategy. In this instance, 267 (1.1%) invasive tests would have been performed, while the current strategy had a total of 307 (1.2%). The false positive rate (FPR) rate would have stayed at 5.2% in both scenarios. In conclusion, the contingent screening of aneuploidies based in the result of the FCT, offering the analysis of cfDNA to patients with an intermediate risk after lowering the cut-off point from 1/50 to 1/10, is a valid alternative that might maintain the current detection rates and avoid the complications associated with invasive testing. MDPI 2022-10-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9599393/ /pubmed/36289845 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10102579 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article García-Jiménez, Rocío Valero, Irene Corrales-Gutiérrez, Isabel Granell, Reyes Borrero, Carlota Sainz-Bueno, José Antonio Does a High-Risk (>1/50) Result for First-Trimester Combined Screening Always Entail Invasive Testing? Which Patients from This Group Might Benefit from cfDNA Testing? |
title | Does a High-Risk (>1/50) Result for First-Trimester Combined Screening Always Entail Invasive Testing? Which Patients from This Group Might Benefit from cfDNA Testing? |
title_full | Does a High-Risk (>1/50) Result for First-Trimester Combined Screening Always Entail Invasive Testing? Which Patients from This Group Might Benefit from cfDNA Testing? |
title_fullStr | Does a High-Risk (>1/50) Result for First-Trimester Combined Screening Always Entail Invasive Testing? Which Patients from This Group Might Benefit from cfDNA Testing? |
title_full_unstemmed | Does a High-Risk (>1/50) Result for First-Trimester Combined Screening Always Entail Invasive Testing? Which Patients from This Group Might Benefit from cfDNA Testing? |
title_short | Does a High-Risk (>1/50) Result for First-Trimester Combined Screening Always Entail Invasive Testing? Which Patients from This Group Might Benefit from cfDNA Testing? |
title_sort | does a high-risk (>1/50) result for first-trimester combined screening always entail invasive testing? which patients from this group might benefit from cfdna testing? |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9599393/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36289845 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10102579 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT garciajimenezrocio doesahighrisk150resultforfirsttrimestercombinedscreeningalwaysentailinvasivetestingwhichpatientsfromthisgroupmightbenefitfromcfdnatesting AT valeroirene doesahighrisk150resultforfirsttrimestercombinedscreeningalwaysentailinvasivetestingwhichpatientsfromthisgroupmightbenefitfromcfdnatesting AT corralesgutierrezisabel doesahighrisk150resultforfirsttrimestercombinedscreeningalwaysentailinvasivetestingwhichpatientsfromthisgroupmightbenefitfromcfdnatesting AT granellreyes doesahighrisk150resultforfirsttrimestercombinedscreeningalwaysentailinvasivetestingwhichpatientsfromthisgroupmightbenefitfromcfdnatesting AT borrerocarlota doesahighrisk150resultforfirsttrimestercombinedscreeningalwaysentailinvasivetestingwhichpatientsfromthisgroupmightbenefitfromcfdnatesting AT sainzbuenojoseantonio doesahighrisk150resultforfirsttrimestercombinedscreeningalwaysentailinvasivetestingwhichpatientsfromthisgroupmightbenefitfromcfdnatesting |