Cargando…

Radiologist versus Non-Radiologist Detection of Lymph Node Metastasis in Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma by Ultrasound: A Meta-Analysis

Papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) is the most common thyroid cancer worldwide and is known to spread to adjacent neck lymphatics. Lymph node metastasis (LNM) is a known predictor of disease recurrence and is an indicator for aggressive resection. Our study aims to determine if ultrasound sonographer...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Issa, Peter P., Mueller, Lauren, Hussein, Mohammad, Albuck, Aaron, Shama, Mohamed, Toraih, Eman, Kandil, Emad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9599420/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36289838
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10102575
_version_ 1784816589824065536
author Issa, Peter P.
Mueller, Lauren
Hussein, Mohammad
Albuck, Aaron
Shama, Mohamed
Toraih, Eman
Kandil, Emad
author_facet Issa, Peter P.
Mueller, Lauren
Hussein, Mohammad
Albuck, Aaron
Shama, Mohamed
Toraih, Eman
Kandil, Emad
author_sort Issa, Peter P.
collection PubMed
description Papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) is the most common thyroid cancer worldwide and is known to spread to adjacent neck lymphatics. Lymph node metastasis (LNM) is a known predictor of disease recurrence and is an indicator for aggressive resection. Our study aims to determine if ultrasound sonographers’ degree of training influences overall LNM detection. PubMed, Embase, and Scopus articles were searched and screened for relevant articles. Two investigators independently screened and extracted the data. Diagnostic test parameters were determined for all studies, studies reported by radiologists, and studies reported by non-radiologists. The total sample size amounted to 5768 patients and 10,030 lymph nodes. Radiologists performed ultrasounds in 18 studies, while non-radiologists performed ultrasounds in seven studies, corresponding to 4442 and 1326 patients, respectively. The overall sensitivity of LNM detection by US was 59% (95%CI = 58–60%), and the overall specificity was 85% (95%CI = 84–86%). The sensitivity and specificity of US performed by radiologists were 58% and 86%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of US performed by non-radiologists were 62% and 78%, respectively. Summary receiver operating curve (sROC) found radiologists and non-radiologists to detect LNM on US with similar accuracy (p = 0.517). Our work suggests that both radiologists and non-radiologists alike detect overall LNM with high accuracy on US.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9599420
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95994202022-10-27 Radiologist versus Non-Radiologist Detection of Lymph Node Metastasis in Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma by Ultrasound: A Meta-Analysis Issa, Peter P. Mueller, Lauren Hussein, Mohammad Albuck, Aaron Shama, Mohamed Toraih, Eman Kandil, Emad Biomedicines Systematic Review Papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) is the most common thyroid cancer worldwide and is known to spread to adjacent neck lymphatics. Lymph node metastasis (LNM) is a known predictor of disease recurrence and is an indicator for aggressive resection. Our study aims to determine if ultrasound sonographers’ degree of training influences overall LNM detection. PubMed, Embase, and Scopus articles were searched and screened for relevant articles. Two investigators independently screened and extracted the data. Diagnostic test parameters were determined for all studies, studies reported by radiologists, and studies reported by non-radiologists. The total sample size amounted to 5768 patients and 10,030 lymph nodes. Radiologists performed ultrasounds in 18 studies, while non-radiologists performed ultrasounds in seven studies, corresponding to 4442 and 1326 patients, respectively. The overall sensitivity of LNM detection by US was 59% (95%CI = 58–60%), and the overall specificity was 85% (95%CI = 84–86%). The sensitivity and specificity of US performed by radiologists were 58% and 86%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of US performed by non-radiologists were 62% and 78%, respectively. Summary receiver operating curve (sROC) found radiologists and non-radiologists to detect LNM on US with similar accuracy (p = 0.517). Our work suggests that both radiologists and non-radiologists alike detect overall LNM with high accuracy on US. MDPI 2022-10-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9599420/ /pubmed/36289838 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10102575 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Issa, Peter P.
Mueller, Lauren
Hussein, Mohammad
Albuck, Aaron
Shama, Mohamed
Toraih, Eman
Kandil, Emad
Radiologist versus Non-Radiologist Detection of Lymph Node Metastasis in Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma by Ultrasound: A Meta-Analysis
title Radiologist versus Non-Radiologist Detection of Lymph Node Metastasis in Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma by Ultrasound: A Meta-Analysis
title_full Radiologist versus Non-Radiologist Detection of Lymph Node Metastasis in Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma by Ultrasound: A Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Radiologist versus Non-Radiologist Detection of Lymph Node Metastasis in Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma by Ultrasound: A Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Radiologist versus Non-Radiologist Detection of Lymph Node Metastasis in Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma by Ultrasound: A Meta-Analysis
title_short Radiologist versus Non-Radiologist Detection of Lymph Node Metastasis in Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma by Ultrasound: A Meta-Analysis
title_sort radiologist versus non-radiologist detection of lymph node metastasis in papillary thyroid carcinoma by ultrasound: a meta-analysis
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9599420/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36289838
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10102575
work_keys_str_mv AT issapeterp radiologistversusnonradiologistdetectionoflymphnodemetastasisinpapillarythyroidcarcinomabyultrasoundametaanalysis
AT muellerlauren radiologistversusnonradiologistdetectionoflymphnodemetastasisinpapillarythyroidcarcinomabyultrasoundametaanalysis
AT husseinmohammad radiologistversusnonradiologistdetectionoflymphnodemetastasisinpapillarythyroidcarcinomabyultrasoundametaanalysis
AT albuckaaron radiologistversusnonradiologistdetectionoflymphnodemetastasisinpapillarythyroidcarcinomabyultrasoundametaanalysis
AT shamamohamed radiologistversusnonradiologistdetectionoflymphnodemetastasisinpapillarythyroidcarcinomabyultrasoundametaanalysis
AT toraiheman radiologistversusnonradiologistdetectionoflymphnodemetastasisinpapillarythyroidcarcinomabyultrasoundametaanalysis
AT kandilemad radiologistversusnonradiologistdetectionoflymphnodemetastasisinpapillarythyroidcarcinomabyultrasoundametaanalysis