LAG3-PD1 or CTLA4-PD1 Inhibition in Advanced Melanoma: Indirect Cross Comparisons of the CheckMate-067 and RELATIVITY-047 Trials

SIMPLE SUMMARY: In the past few decades, targeted therapy and immunotherapy have transformed tremendously the chances of survival. Checkpoint inhibitors that block programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) pathways hold the most promise. However, more than half of the patients treated with CTLA-4-PD1 inhibition suffered from grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). Recently, Tawbi et al. reported the initial results of the phase 2–3 RELATIVITY-047 trial which evaluated LAG3-PD1 inhibition of relatlimab plus nivolumab in patients with previously untreated advanced melanoma. Here, we performed an indirect cross-comparison of LAG3-PD1 and CTLA4-PD1 inhibition in patients with previously untreated advanced melanoma by deriving individual patient survival data and safety profiles. We found that the PFS of LAG3-PD1 and CTLA4-PD1 inhibition were similar. Compared with CTLA4-PD1-inhibition, LAG3-PD1 inhibition tended to exhibit earlier survival benefit and lesser TRAEs. ABSTRACT: Objective: To compare the inhibition of LAG3-PD1 versus the inhibition of CTLA-4-PD1 in patients with previously untreated advanced melanoma. Methods: The individual participant data (IPD) were extracted from the KM plots using a graphical reconstructive algorithm. Log-rank, Cox proportional hazard model, Bayesian hierarchical model with time-varying hazard ratio (HR) effect, and restricted mean survival time (RMST) were performed to estimate survival benefits. Results: The CheckMate-067 (n = 630) and RELATIVITY-047 (n = 714) trials were included for analysis. The graphical reconstructive algorithm showed that IPD had similar HRs and log-rank values as the original plots. The HR of nivolumab plus relatlimab (LAG3 inhibitor) versus nivolumab plus ipilimumab (CTLA4 inhibitor) was 1.19 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.96 to1.48). The 24-months RMST of nivolumab plus relatlimab versus nivolumab was 2.35 (95% CI 0.77–3.94) months, compared with 1.87 (95% CI, 0.25–3.49) months for nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus nivolumab. The Bayesian hierarchical model showed that patients treated with nivolumab plus relatlimab had earlier PFS benefits than those with nivolumab plus ipilimumab. Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 18.9% of patients using nivolumab plus relatlimab and 55.0% of patients using nivolumab plus ipilimumab. Conclusions: These findings suggest that the PFS of LAG3-PD1 and CTLA4-PD1 inhibition were similar and LAG3-PD1 inhibition exhibited earlier survival benefit and lesser TRAEs.