Cargando…
Inter-Individual Variability in Motor Output Is Driven by Recruitment Gain in the Corticospinal Tract Rather Than Motor Threshold
Variability in the response of individuals to various non-invasive brain stimulation protocols is a major problem that limits their potential for clinical applications. Baseline motor-evoked potential (MEP) amplitude is the key predictor of an individual’s response to transcranial magnetic stimulati...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9599681/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36291333 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12101401 |
_version_ | 1784816653506183168 |
---|---|
author | Sarkar, Arkaprovo Dipani, Alish Leodori, Giorgio Popa, Traian Kassavetis, Panagiotis Hallett, Mark Thirugnanasambandam, Nivethida |
author_facet | Sarkar, Arkaprovo Dipani, Alish Leodori, Giorgio Popa, Traian Kassavetis, Panagiotis Hallett, Mark Thirugnanasambandam, Nivethida |
author_sort | Sarkar, Arkaprovo |
collection | PubMed |
description | Variability in the response of individuals to various non-invasive brain stimulation protocols is a major problem that limits their potential for clinical applications. Baseline motor-evoked potential (MEP) amplitude is the key predictor of an individual’s response to transcranial magnetic stimulation protocols. However, the factors that predict MEP amplitude and its variability remain unclear. In this study, we aimed to identify the input–output curve (IOC) parameters that best predict MEP amplitude and its variability. We analysed IOC data from 75 subjects and built a general linear model (GLM) using the IOC parameters as regressors and MEP amplitude at 120% resting motor threshold (RMT) as the response variable. We bootstrapped the data to estimate variability of IOC parameters and included them in a GLM to identify the significant predictors of MEP amplitude variability. Peak slope, motor threshold, and maximum MEP amplitude of the IOC were significant predictors of MEP amplitude at 120% RMT and its variability was primarily driven by the variability of peak slope and maximum MEP amplitude. Recruitment gain and maximum corticospinal excitability are the key predictors of MEP amplitude and its variability. Inter-individual variability in motor output may be reduced by achieving a uniform IOC slope. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9599681 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95996812022-10-27 Inter-Individual Variability in Motor Output Is Driven by Recruitment Gain in the Corticospinal Tract Rather Than Motor Threshold Sarkar, Arkaprovo Dipani, Alish Leodori, Giorgio Popa, Traian Kassavetis, Panagiotis Hallett, Mark Thirugnanasambandam, Nivethida Brain Sci Article Variability in the response of individuals to various non-invasive brain stimulation protocols is a major problem that limits their potential for clinical applications. Baseline motor-evoked potential (MEP) amplitude is the key predictor of an individual’s response to transcranial magnetic stimulation protocols. However, the factors that predict MEP amplitude and its variability remain unclear. In this study, we aimed to identify the input–output curve (IOC) parameters that best predict MEP amplitude and its variability. We analysed IOC data from 75 subjects and built a general linear model (GLM) using the IOC parameters as regressors and MEP amplitude at 120% resting motor threshold (RMT) as the response variable. We bootstrapped the data to estimate variability of IOC parameters and included them in a GLM to identify the significant predictors of MEP amplitude variability. Peak slope, motor threshold, and maximum MEP amplitude of the IOC were significant predictors of MEP amplitude at 120% RMT and its variability was primarily driven by the variability of peak slope and maximum MEP amplitude. Recruitment gain and maximum corticospinal excitability are the key predictors of MEP amplitude and its variability. Inter-individual variability in motor output may be reduced by achieving a uniform IOC slope. MDPI 2022-10-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9599681/ /pubmed/36291333 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12101401 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Sarkar, Arkaprovo Dipani, Alish Leodori, Giorgio Popa, Traian Kassavetis, Panagiotis Hallett, Mark Thirugnanasambandam, Nivethida Inter-Individual Variability in Motor Output Is Driven by Recruitment Gain in the Corticospinal Tract Rather Than Motor Threshold |
title | Inter-Individual Variability in Motor Output Is Driven by Recruitment Gain in the Corticospinal Tract Rather Than Motor Threshold |
title_full | Inter-Individual Variability in Motor Output Is Driven by Recruitment Gain in the Corticospinal Tract Rather Than Motor Threshold |
title_fullStr | Inter-Individual Variability in Motor Output Is Driven by Recruitment Gain in the Corticospinal Tract Rather Than Motor Threshold |
title_full_unstemmed | Inter-Individual Variability in Motor Output Is Driven by Recruitment Gain in the Corticospinal Tract Rather Than Motor Threshold |
title_short | Inter-Individual Variability in Motor Output Is Driven by Recruitment Gain in the Corticospinal Tract Rather Than Motor Threshold |
title_sort | inter-individual variability in motor output is driven by recruitment gain in the corticospinal tract rather than motor threshold |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9599681/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36291333 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12101401 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sarkararkaprovo interindividualvariabilityinmotoroutputisdrivenbyrecruitmentgaininthecorticospinaltractratherthanmotorthreshold AT dipanialish interindividualvariabilityinmotoroutputisdrivenbyrecruitmentgaininthecorticospinaltractratherthanmotorthreshold AT leodorigiorgio interindividualvariabilityinmotoroutputisdrivenbyrecruitmentgaininthecorticospinaltractratherthanmotorthreshold AT popatraian interindividualvariabilityinmotoroutputisdrivenbyrecruitmentgaininthecorticospinaltractratherthanmotorthreshold AT kassavetispanagiotis interindividualvariabilityinmotoroutputisdrivenbyrecruitmentgaininthecorticospinaltractratherthanmotorthreshold AT hallettmark interindividualvariabilityinmotoroutputisdrivenbyrecruitmentgaininthecorticospinaltractratherthanmotorthreshold AT thirugnanasambandamnivethida interindividualvariabilityinmotoroutputisdrivenbyrecruitmentgaininthecorticospinaltractratherthanmotorthreshold |