Cargando…

Executive Functions in Decision Making under Ambiguity and Risk in Healthy Adults: A Scoping Review Adopting the Hot and Cold Executive Functions Perspective

Decision making (DM) has a pivotal role in supporting individual autonomy and well-being. It is considered a complex ability exploiting many cognitive functions, among which executive functions (EFs) are crucial. Few studies analyzed the role played by EFs in DM in healthy adults under ambiguity and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Colautti, Laura, Antonietti, Alessandro, Iannello, Paola
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9599766/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36291269
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12101335
_version_ 1784816674097070080
author Colautti, Laura
Antonietti, Alessandro
Iannello, Paola
author_facet Colautti, Laura
Antonietti, Alessandro
Iannello, Paola
author_sort Colautti, Laura
collection PubMed
description Decision making (DM) has a pivotal role in supporting individual autonomy and well-being. It is considered a complex ability exploiting many cognitive functions, among which executive functions (EFs) are crucial. Few studies analyzed the role played by EFs in DM in healthy adults under ambiguity and risk, which are common conditions for most decisions in daily life. This scoping review aims to analyze the relationships between two individual tasks widely used to assess DM under these conditions (Iowa Gambling Task and Game of Dice Task) and EFs. According to the organizing principle that conceptualizes hot and cold EFs, DM under such conditions mainly implies hot EFs, but the relationship with cold EFs is still unclear. Using such an approach, a comprehensive framework is provided, highlighting main findings and identifying possible gaps in the literature. The results suggest different roles played by cold EFs in DM under ambiguity and risk, according to the characteristics of the tasks. The findings can offer guidance to further studies and to design interventions to support DM in healthy adults.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9599766
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95997662022-10-27 Executive Functions in Decision Making under Ambiguity and Risk in Healthy Adults: A Scoping Review Adopting the Hot and Cold Executive Functions Perspective Colautti, Laura Antonietti, Alessandro Iannello, Paola Brain Sci Review Decision making (DM) has a pivotal role in supporting individual autonomy and well-being. It is considered a complex ability exploiting many cognitive functions, among which executive functions (EFs) are crucial. Few studies analyzed the role played by EFs in DM in healthy adults under ambiguity and risk, which are common conditions for most decisions in daily life. This scoping review aims to analyze the relationships between two individual tasks widely used to assess DM under these conditions (Iowa Gambling Task and Game of Dice Task) and EFs. According to the organizing principle that conceptualizes hot and cold EFs, DM under such conditions mainly implies hot EFs, but the relationship with cold EFs is still unclear. Using such an approach, a comprehensive framework is provided, highlighting main findings and identifying possible gaps in the literature. The results suggest different roles played by cold EFs in DM under ambiguity and risk, according to the characteristics of the tasks. The findings can offer guidance to further studies and to design interventions to support DM in healthy adults. MDPI 2022-10-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9599766/ /pubmed/36291269 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12101335 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Colautti, Laura
Antonietti, Alessandro
Iannello, Paola
Executive Functions in Decision Making under Ambiguity and Risk in Healthy Adults: A Scoping Review Adopting the Hot and Cold Executive Functions Perspective
title Executive Functions in Decision Making under Ambiguity and Risk in Healthy Adults: A Scoping Review Adopting the Hot and Cold Executive Functions Perspective
title_full Executive Functions in Decision Making under Ambiguity and Risk in Healthy Adults: A Scoping Review Adopting the Hot and Cold Executive Functions Perspective
title_fullStr Executive Functions in Decision Making under Ambiguity and Risk in Healthy Adults: A Scoping Review Adopting the Hot and Cold Executive Functions Perspective
title_full_unstemmed Executive Functions in Decision Making under Ambiguity and Risk in Healthy Adults: A Scoping Review Adopting the Hot and Cold Executive Functions Perspective
title_short Executive Functions in Decision Making under Ambiguity and Risk in Healthy Adults: A Scoping Review Adopting the Hot and Cold Executive Functions Perspective
title_sort executive functions in decision making under ambiguity and risk in healthy adults: a scoping review adopting the hot and cold executive functions perspective
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9599766/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36291269
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12101335
work_keys_str_mv AT colauttilaura executivefunctionsindecisionmakingunderambiguityandriskinhealthyadultsascopingreviewadoptingthehotandcoldexecutivefunctionsperspective
AT antoniettialessandro executivefunctionsindecisionmakingunderambiguityandriskinhealthyadultsascopingreviewadoptingthehotandcoldexecutivefunctionsperspective
AT iannellopaola executivefunctionsindecisionmakingunderambiguityandriskinhealthyadultsascopingreviewadoptingthehotandcoldexecutivefunctionsperspective