Cargando…

Image Quality Improvement Techniques and Assessment Adequacy in Clinical Optoacoustic Imaging: A Systematic Review

Optoacoustic imaging relies on the detection of optically induced acoustic waves to offer new possibilities in morphological and functional imaging. As the modality matures towards clinical application, research efforts aim to address multifactorial limitations that negatively impact the resulting i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dimaridis, Ioannis, Sridharan, Patmaa, Ntziachristos, Vasilis, Karlas, Angelos, Hadjileontiadis, Leontios
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9599915/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36291038
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bios12100901
_version_ 1784816711250214912
author Dimaridis, Ioannis
Sridharan, Patmaa
Ntziachristos, Vasilis
Karlas, Angelos
Hadjileontiadis, Leontios
author_facet Dimaridis, Ioannis
Sridharan, Patmaa
Ntziachristos, Vasilis
Karlas, Angelos
Hadjileontiadis, Leontios
author_sort Dimaridis, Ioannis
collection PubMed
description Optoacoustic imaging relies on the detection of optically induced acoustic waves to offer new possibilities in morphological and functional imaging. As the modality matures towards clinical application, research efforts aim to address multifactorial limitations that negatively impact the resulting image quality. In an endeavor to obtain a clear view on the limitations and their effects, as well as the status of this progressive refinement process, we conduct an extensive search for optoacoustic image quality improvement approaches that have been evaluated with humans in vivo, thus focusing on clinically relevant outcomes. We query six databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, IEEE Xplore, ACM Digital Library, and Google Scholar) for articles published from 1 January 2010 to 31 October 2021, and identify 45 relevant research works through a systematic screening process. We review the identified approaches, describing their primary objectives, targeted limitations, and key technical implementation details. Moreover, considering comprehensive and objective quality assessment as an essential prerequisite for the adoption of such approaches in clinical practice, we subject 36 of the 45 papers to a further in-depth analysis of the reported quality evaluation procedures, and elicit a set of criteria with the intent to capture key evaluation aspects. Through a comparative criteria-wise rating process, we seek research efforts that exhibit excellence in quality assessment of their proposed methods, and discuss features that distinguish them from works with similar objectives. Additionally, informed by the rating results, we highlight areas with improvement potential, and extract recommendations for designing quality assessment pipelines capable of providing rich evidence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9599915
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95999152022-10-27 Image Quality Improvement Techniques and Assessment Adequacy in Clinical Optoacoustic Imaging: A Systematic Review Dimaridis, Ioannis Sridharan, Patmaa Ntziachristos, Vasilis Karlas, Angelos Hadjileontiadis, Leontios Biosensors (Basel) Systematic Review Optoacoustic imaging relies on the detection of optically induced acoustic waves to offer new possibilities in morphological and functional imaging. As the modality matures towards clinical application, research efforts aim to address multifactorial limitations that negatively impact the resulting image quality. In an endeavor to obtain a clear view on the limitations and their effects, as well as the status of this progressive refinement process, we conduct an extensive search for optoacoustic image quality improvement approaches that have been evaluated with humans in vivo, thus focusing on clinically relevant outcomes. We query six databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, IEEE Xplore, ACM Digital Library, and Google Scholar) for articles published from 1 January 2010 to 31 October 2021, and identify 45 relevant research works through a systematic screening process. We review the identified approaches, describing their primary objectives, targeted limitations, and key technical implementation details. Moreover, considering comprehensive and objective quality assessment as an essential prerequisite for the adoption of such approaches in clinical practice, we subject 36 of the 45 papers to a further in-depth analysis of the reported quality evaluation procedures, and elicit a set of criteria with the intent to capture key evaluation aspects. Through a comparative criteria-wise rating process, we seek research efforts that exhibit excellence in quality assessment of their proposed methods, and discuss features that distinguish them from works with similar objectives. Additionally, informed by the rating results, we highlight areas with improvement potential, and extract recommendations for designing quality assessment pipelines capable of providing rich evidence. MDPI 2022-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9599915/ /pubmed/36291038 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bios12100901 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Dimaridis, Ioannis
Sridharan, Patmaa
Ntziachristos, Vasilis
Karlas, Angelos
Hadjileontiadis, Leontios
Image Quality Improvement Techniques and Assessment Adequacy in Clinical Optoacoustic Imaging: A Systematic Review
title Image Quality Improvement Techniques and Assessment Adequacy in Clinical Optoacoustic Imaging: A Systematic Review
title_full Image Quality Improvement Techniques and Assessment Adequacy in Clinical Optoacoustic Imaging: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Image Quality Improvement Techniques and Assessment Adequacy in Clinical Optoacoustic Imaging: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Image Quality Improvement Techniques and Assessment Adequacy in Clinical Optoacoustic Imaging: A Systematic Review
title_short Image Quality Improvement Techniques and Assessment Adequacy in Clinical Optoacoustic Imaging: A Systematic Review
title_sort image quality improvement techniques and assessment adequacy in clinical optoacoustic imaging: a systematic review
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9599915/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36291038
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bios12100901
work_keys_str_mv AT dimaridisioannis imagequalityimprovementtechniquesandassessmentadequacyinclinicaloptoacousticimagingasystematicreview
AT sridharanpatmaa imagequalityimprovementtechniquesandassessmentadequacyinclinicaloptoacousticimagingasystematicreview
AT ntziachristosvasilis imagequalityimprovementtechniquesandassessmentadequacyinclinicaloptoacousticimagingasystematicreview
AT karlasangelos imagequalityimprovementtechniquesandassessmentadequacyinclinicaloptoacousticimagingasystematicreview
AT hadjileontiadisleontios imagequalityimprovementtechniquesandassessmentadequacyinclinicaloptoacousticimagingasystematicreview