Cargando…

Concordance Rate of Colposcopy in Detecting Cervical Intraepithelial Lesions

Background: The purpose of this research is to estimate the rate of concordance, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of colposcopy for high-grade squamous lesions and carcinomas (HSIL+). Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of colposco...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stuebs, Frederik A., Dietl, Anna K., Behrens, Annika, Adler, Werner, Geppert, Carol, Hartmann, Arndt, Knöll, Antje, Beckmann, Matthias W., Mehlhorn, Grit, Schulmeyer, Carla E., Gass, Paul, Koch, Martin C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9600163/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36292125
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12102436
_version_ 1784816773184356352
author Stuebs, Frederik A.
Dietl, Anna K.
Behrens, Annika
Adler, Werner
Geppert, Carol
Hartmann, Arndt
Knöll, Antje
Beckmann, Matthias W.
Mehlhorn, Grit
Schulmeyer, Carla E.
Gass, Paul
Koch, Martin C.
author_facet Stuebs, Frederik A.
Dietl, Anna K.
Behrens, Annika
Adler, Werner
Geppert, Carol
Hartmann, Arndt
Knöll, Antje
Beckmann, Matthias W.
Mehlhorn, Grit
Schulmeyer, Carla E.
Gass, Paul
Koch, Martin C.
author_sort Stuebs, Frederik A.
collection PubMed
description Background: The purpose of this research is to estimate the rate of concordance, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of colposcopy for high-grade squamous lesions and carcinomas (HSIL+). Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of colposcopies performed in the certified Dysplasia Unit in Erlangen between January 2015 and May 2022 (7.5 years). The colposcopic findings were correlated with biopsies obtained during examinations or surgery. Cases without histology were excluded. The primary outcome was the rate of concordance between the colposcopic and histological findings in relation to the type of transformation zone (TZ), examiner’s level of experience and age of the patients. Results: A total of 4778 colposcopies in 4001 women were analyzed. The rates of concordance for CIN I/LSIL, CIN II/HSIL, CIN III/HSIL, and carcinoma were 43.4%, 59.5%, 78.5%, and 53.9%, respectively. The rate of concordance was lowest for TZ3 and highest for colposcopists with more than 10 years’ experience. Conclusions: Colposcopy is an important, feasible, and effective method. Careful work-up needs to be performed for women with TZ3 who are over 35 years old, as they are at the highest risk of being misdiagnosed. The highest concordance for detecting HSIL+ was seen for colposcopists with >10 years’ experience.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9600163
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96001632022-10-27 Concordance Rate of Colposcopy in Detecting Cervical Intraepithelial Lesions Stuebs, Frederik A. Dietl, Anna K. Behrens, Annika Adler, Werner Geppert, Carol Hartmann, Arndt Knöll, Antje Beckmann, Matthias W. Mehlhorn, Grit Schulmeyer, Carla E. Gass, Paul Koch, Martin C. Diagnostics (Basel) Article Background: The purpose of this research is to estimate the rate of concordance, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of colposcopy for high-grade squamous lesions and carcinomas (HSIL+). Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of colposcopies performed in the certified Dysplasia Unit in Erlangen between January 2015 and May 2022 (7.5 years). The colposcopic findings were correlated with biopsies obtained during examinations or surgery. Cases without histology were excluded. The primary outcome was the rate of concordance between the colposcopic and histological findings in relation to the type of transformation zone (TZ), examiner’s level of experience and age of the patients. Results: A total of 4778 colposcopies in 4001 women were analyzed. The rates of concordance for CIN I/LSIL, CIN II/HSIL, CIN III/HSIL, and carcinoma were 43.4%, 59.5%, 78.5%, and 53.9%, respectively. The rate of concordance was lowest for TZ3 and highest for colposcopists with more than 10 years’ experience. Conclusions: Colposcopy is an important, feasible, and effective method. Careful work-up needs to be performed for women with TZ3 who are over 35 years old, as they are at the highest risk of being misdiagnosed. The highest concordance for detecting HSIL+ was seen for colposcopists with >10 years’ experience. MDPI 2022-10-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9600163/ /pubmed/36292125 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12102436 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Stuebs, Frederik A.
Dietl, Anna K.
Behrens, Annika
Adler, Werner
Geppert, Carol
Hartmann, Arndt
Knöll, Antje
Beckmann, Matthias W.
Mehlhorn, Grit
Schulmeyer, Carla E.
Gass, Paul
Koch, Martin C.
Concordance Rate of Colposcopy in Detecting Cervical Intraepithelial Lesions
title Concordance Rate of Colposcopy in Detecting Cervical Intraepithelial Lesions
title_full Concordance Rate of Colposcopy in Detecting Cervical Intraepithelial Lesions
title_fullStr Concordance Rate of Colposcopy in Detecting Cervical Intraepithelial Lesions
title_full_unstemmed Concordance Rate of Colposcopy in Detecting Cervical Intraepithelial Lesions
title_short Concordance Rate of Colposcopy in Detecting Cervical Intraepithelial Lesions
title_sort concordance rate of colposcopy in detecting cervical intraepithelial lesions
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9600163/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36292125
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12102436
work_keys_str_mv AT stuebsfrederika concordancerateofcolposcopyindetectingcervicalintraepitheliallesions
AT dietlannak concordancerateofcolposcopyindetectingcervicalintraepitheliallesions
AT behrensannika concordancerateofcolposcopyindetectingcervicalintraepitheliallesions
AT adlerwerner concordancerateofcolposcopyindetectingcervicalintraepitheliallesions
AT geppertcarol concordancerateofcolposcopyindetectingcervicalintraepitheliallesions
AT hartmannarndt concordancerateofcolposcopyindetectingcervicalintraepitheliallesions
AT knollantje concordancerateofcolposcopyindetectingcervicalintraepitheliallesions
AT beckmannmatthiasw concordancerateofcolposcopyindetectingcervicalintraepitheliallesions
AT mehlhorngrit concordancerateofcolposcopyindetectingcervicalintraepitheliallesions
AT schulmeyercarlae concordancerateofcolposcopyindetectingcervicalintraepitheliallesions
AT gasspaul concordancerateofcolposcopyindetectingcervicalintraepitheliallesions
AT kochmartinc concordancerateofcolposcopyindetectingcervicalintraepitheliallesions