Cargando…

The role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced colon cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Controversy persists about neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) within the field of locally advanced colon cancer (LACC). The purpose of this study was to assess the existing and latest literature with high quality to determine the role of NAC in various aspects. METHODS: A comprehensive liter...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liang, Zongyu, Li, Zhu, Yang, Qingshui, Feng, Jiahao, Xiang, Deyu, Lyu, Haina, Mai, Guangzhi, Wang, Wanchuan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9600337/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36313637
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.1024345
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Controversy persists about neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) within the field of locally advanced colon cancer (LACC). The purpose of this study was to assess the existing and latest literature with high quality to determine the role of NAC in various aspects. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search of the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library databases was conducted from inception to April 2022. Review Manager 5.3 was applied for meta-analyses with a random-effects model whenever possible. RESULTS: Overall, 8 studies were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis, comprising 4 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 4 retrospective studies involving 40,136 participants. The 3-year overall survival (OS) (HR: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.66-1.23, P = 0.51) and 5-year OS (HR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.53-1.03, P = 0.53) were comparable between two groups. Mortality in 30 days was found less frequent in the NAC group (OR: 0.43, 95% CI: 0.20-0.91, P = 0.03), whereas no significant differences were detected concerning other perioperative complications, R0 resection, or adverse events. In terms of subgroup analyses for RCTs, less anastomotic leak (OR: 0.51, 95% CI: 0.31-0.86, P = 0.01) and higher R0 resection rate (OR: 2.35, 95% CI: 1.04-5.32, P = 0.04) were observed in the NAC group. CONCLUSIONS: NAC is safe and feasible for patients with LACC, but no significant survival benefit could be demonstrated. The application of NAC still needs to be prudent until significant evidence supporting the oncological outcomes is presented. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero, identifier (CRD42022333306).