Cargando…

The Cytotoxicity and Genotoxicity of Bioactive Dental Materials

The promotion of biologically based treatment strategies in restorative dentistry is of paramount importance, as invasive treatments should be avoided to maintain the tooth’s vitality. This study aimed to assess the biocompatibility of commercially available bioactive materials that can be used for...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kunert, Marta, Rozpedek-Kaminska, Wioletta, Galita, Grzegorz, Sauro, Salvatore, Bourgi, Rim, Hardan, Louis, Majsterek, Ireneusz, Lukomska-Szymanska, Monika
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9600439/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36291107
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cells11203238
_version_ 1784816842527735808
author Kunert, Marta
Rozpedek-Kaminska, Wioletta
Galita, Grzegorz
Sauro, Salvatore
Bourgi, Rim
Hardan, Louis
Majsterek, Ireneusz
Lukomska-Szymanska, Monika
author_facet Kunert, Marta
Rozpedek-Kaminska, Wioletta
Galita, Grzegorz
Sauro, Salvatore
Bourgi, Rim
Hardan, Louis
Majsterek, Ireneusz
Lukomska-Szymanska, Monika
author_sort Kunert, Marta
collection PubMed
description The promotion of biologically based treatment strategies in restorative dentistry is of paramount importance, as invasive treatments should be avoided to maintain the tooth’s vitality. This study aimed to assess the biocompatibility of commercially available bioactive materials that can be used for dental pulp capping. The study was performed with a monocyte/macrophage peripheral blood SC cell line (ATCC CRL-9855) on the following six specific bioactive materials: ProRoot MTA (Dentsply Sirona), MTA Angelus (Angelus), Biodentine (Septodont), TheraCal LC (Bisco), ACTIVA BioACTIVE (Pulpdent) and Predicta Bioactive Bulk (Parkell). The cytotoxicity of the investigated agents was measured using a resazurin-based cell viability assay, while the genotoxicity was evaluated using an alkaline comet assay. Additionally, flow cytometry (FC) apoptosis detection was conducted with a FITC (fluorescein isothiocyanate) Annexin V Apoptosis Detection Kit I. FC cell-cycle arrest assessment was carried out with propidium iodide staining. The results of this study showed no significant cytotoxicity and genotoxicity (p > 0.05) in ProRoot MTA, MTA Angelus, Biodentine, ACTIVA BioACTIVE and Predicta Bioactive. Conversely, TheraCal LC presented a significant decrease (p < 0.001). In conclusion, due to excellent biocompatibility and low cytotoxicity, MTA, Biodentine, ACTIVA BioACTIVE and Predicta Bioactive may be suitable for pulp capping treatments. On the other hand, due to the high cytotoxicity of TheraCal LC, its use should be avoided in vital pulp therapies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9600439
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96004392022-10-27 The Cytotoxicity and Genotoxicity of Bioactive Dental Materials Kunert, Marta Rozpedek-Kaminska, Wioletta Galita, Grzegorz Sauro, Salvatore Bourgi, Rim Hardan, Louis Majsterek, Ireneusz Lukomska-Szymanska, Monika Cells Article The promotion of biologically based treatment strategies in restorative dentistry is of paramount importance, as invasive treatments should be avoided to maintain the tooth’s vitality. This study aimed to assess the biocompatibility of commercially available bioactive materials that can be used for dental pulp capping. The study was performed with a monocyte/macrophage peripheral blood SC cell line (ATCC CRL-9855) on the following six specific bioactive materials: ProRoot MTA (Dentsply Sirona), MTA Angelus (Angelus), Biodentine (Septodont), TheraCal LC (Bisco), ACTIVA BioACTIVE (Pulpdent) and Predicta Bioactive Bulk (Parkell). The cytotoxicity of the investigated agents was measured using a resazurin-based cell viability assay, while the genotoxicity was evaluated using an alkaline comet assay. Additionally, flow cytometry (FC) apoptosis detection was conducted with a FITC (fluorescein isothiocyanate) Annexin V Apoptosis Detection Kit I. FC cell-cycle arrest assessment was carried out with propidium iodide staining. The results of this study showed no significant cytotoxicity and genotoxicity (p > 0.05) in ProRoot MTA, MTA Angelus, Biodentine, ACTIVA BioACTIVE and Predicta Bioactive. Conversely, TheraCal LC presented a significant decrease (p < 0.001). In conclusion, due to excellent biocompatibility and low cytotoxicity, MTA, Biodentine, ACTIVA BioACTIVE and Predicta Bioactive may be suitable for pulp capping treatments. On the other hand, due to the high cytotoxicity of TheraCal LC, its use should be avoided in vital pulp therapies. MDPI 2022-10-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9600439/ /pubmed/36291107 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cells11203238 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Kunert, Marta
Rozpedek-Kaminska, Wioletta
Galita, Grzegorz
Sauro, Salvatore
Bourgi, Rim
Hardan, Louis
Majsterek, Ireneusz
Lukomska-Szymanska, Monika
The Cytotoxicity and Genotoxicity of Bioactive Dental Materials
title The Cytotoxicity and Genotoxicity of Bioactive Dental Materials
title_full The Cytotoxicity and Genotoxicity of Bioactive Dental Materials
title_fullStr The Cytotoxicity and Genotoxicity of Bioactive Dental Materials
title_full_unstemmed The Cytotoxicity and Genotoxicity of Bioactive Dental Materials
title_short The Cytotoxicity and Genotoxicity of Bioactive Dental Materials
title_sort cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of bioactive dental materials
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9600439/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36291107
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cells11203238
work_keys_str_mv AT kunertmarta thecytotoxicityandgenotoxicityofbioactivedentalmaterials
AT rozpedekkaminskawioletta thecytotoxicityandgenotoxicityofbioactivedentalmaterials
AT galitagrzegorz thecytotoxicityandgenotoxicityofbioactivedentalmaterials
AT saurosalvatore thecytotoxicityandgenotoxicityofbioactivedentalmaterials
AT bourgirim thecytotoxicityandgenotoxicityofbioactivedentalmaterials
AT hardanlouis thecytotoxicityandgenotoxicityofbioactivedentalmaterials
AT majsterekireneusz thecytotoxicityandgenotoxicityofbioactivedentalmaterials
AT lukomskaszymanskamonika thecytotoxicityandgenotoxicityofbioactivedentalmaterials
AT kunertmarta cytotoxicityandgenotoxicityofbioactivedentalmaterials
AT rozpedekkaminskawioletta cytotoxicityandgenotoxicityofbioactivedentalmaterials
AT galitagrzegorz cytotoxicityandgenotoxicityofbioactivedentalmaterials
AT saurosalvatore cytotoxicityandgenotoxicityofbioactivedentalmaterials
AT bourgirim cytotoxicityandgenotoxicityofbioactivedentalmaterials
AT hardanlouis cytotoxicityandgenotoxicityofbioactivedentalmaterials
AT majsterekireneusz cytotoxicityandgenotoxicityofbioactivedentalmaterials
AT lukomskaszymanskamonika cytotoxicityandgenotoxicityofbioactivedentalmaterials