Cargando…
Intra- and Inter-Reader Variations in Lung Nodule Measurements: Influences of Nodule Size, Location, and Observers
(1) Background: Accurate measurement of lung-nodule size is necessary, but whether a three-dimensional volume measurement is better or more reliable than the one-dimensional method is still unclear. This study aimed to investigate the intra- and inter-reader variations according to nodule type, size...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9600531/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36292008 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12102319 |
_version_ | 1784816866052538368 |
---|---|
author | Chen, Hong Huang, Haozhe Zhang, Jianye Wang, Xuexue Han, Mengyang Ding, Chanjun Wang, Jinhong |
author_facet | Chen, Hong Huang, Haozhe Zhang, Jianye Wang, Xuexue Han, Mengyang Ding, Chanjun Wang, Jinhong |
author_sort | Chen, Hong |
collection | PubMed |
description | (1) Background: Accurate measurement of lung-nodule size is necessary, but whether a three-dimensional volume measurement is better or more reliable than the one-dimensional method is still unclear. This study aimed to investigate the intra- and inter-reader variations according to nodule type, size, three-dimensional volume measurements, and one-dimensional linear measurements. (2) Methods: This retrospective study included computed tomography (CT) examinations of lung nodules and volume measurements performed from October to December 2016. Two radiologists independently performed all measurements. Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) and Bland-Altman plots were used for analysis. (3) Results: The overall variability in the calculated volume was larger than when using the semiautomatic volume measurement. Nodules <6 mm tended to have larger variability than nodules ≥6 mm in both one-dimensional and calculated volume measurements. The isolated type showed smaller variability in both intra- and inter-reader comparisons. The juxta-vascular type showed the largest variability in both one-dimensional and calculated volume measurements. The variability was decreased when using the 3D volume semiautomated software. (4) Conclusions: The present study suggests that 3D semiautomatic volume measurements showed lower variability than the calculated volume measurement. Nodule size and location influence measurement variability. The intra- and inter-reader variabilities in nodule volume measurement were considerable. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9600531 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96005312022-10-27 Intra- and Inter-Reader Variations in Lung Nodule Measurements: Influences of Nodule Size, Location, and Observers Chen, Hong Huang, Haozhe Zhang, Jianye Wang, Xuexue Han, Mengyang Ding, Chanjun Wang, Jinhong Diagnostics (Basel) Article (1) Background: Accurate measurement of lung-nodule size is necessary, but whether a three-dimensional volume measurement is better or more reliable than the one-dimensional method is still unclear. This study aimed to investigate the intra- and inter-reader variations according to nodule type, size, three-dimensional volume measurements, and one-dimensional linear measurements. (2) Methods: This retrospective study included computed tomography (CT) examinations of lung nodules and volume measurements performed from October to December 2016. Two radiologists independently performed all measurements. Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) and Bland-Altman plots were used for analysis. (3) Results: The overall variability in the calculated volume was larger than when using the semiautomatic volume measurement. Nodules <6 mm tended to have larger variability than nodules ≥6 mm in both one-dimensional and calculated volume measurements. The isolated type showed smaller variability in both intra- and inter-reader comparisons. The juxta-vascular type showed the largest variability in both one-dimensional and calculated volume measurements. The variability was decreased when using the 3D volume semiautomated software. (4) Conclusions: The present study suggests that 3D semiautomatic volume measurements showed lower variability than the calculated volume measurement. Nodule size and location influence measurement variability. The intra- and inter-reader variabilities in nodule volume measurement were considerable. MDPI 2022-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9600531/ /pubmed/36292008 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12102319 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Chen, Hong Huang, Haozhe Zhang, Jianye Wang, Xuexue Han, Mengyang Ding, Chanjun Wang, Jinhong Intra- and Inter-Reader Variations in Lung Nodule Measurements: Influences of Nodule Size, Location, and Observers |
title | Intra- and Inter-Reader Variations in Lung Nodule Measurements: Influences of Nodule Size, Location, and Observers |
title_full | Intra- and Inter-Reader Variations in Lung Nodule Measurements: Influences of Nodule Size, Location, and Observers |
title_fullStr | Intra- and Inter-Reader Variations in Lung Nodule Measurements: Influences of Nodule Size, Location, and Observers |
title_full_unstemmed | Intra- and Inter-Reader Variations in Lung Nodule Measurements: Influences of Nodule Size, Location, and Observers |
title_short | Intra- and Inter-Reader Variations in Lung Nodule Measurements: Influences of Nodule Size, Location, and Observers |
title_sort | intra- and inter-reader variations in lung nodule measurements: influences of nodule size, location, and observers |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9600531/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36292008 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12102319 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chenhong intraandinterreadervariationsinlungnodulemeasurementsinfluencesofnodulesizelocationandobservers AT huanghaozhe intraandinterreadervariationsinlungnodulemeasurementsinfluencesofnodulesizelocationandobservers AT zhangjianye intraandinterreadervariationsinlungnodulemeasurementsinfluencesofnodulesizelocationandobservers AT wangxuexue intraandinterreadervariationsinlungnodulemeasurementsinfluencesofnodulesizelocationandobservers AT hanmengyang intraandinterreadervariationsinlungnodulemeasurementsinfluencesofnodulesizelocationandobservers AT dingchanjun intraandinterreadervariationsinlungnodulemeasurementsinfluencesofnodulesizelocationandobservers AT wangjinhong intraandinterreadervariationsinlungnodulemeasurementsinfluencesofnodulesizelocationandobservers |