Cargando…

Comparative Evaluation of Two Bracket Systems’ Bond Strength: Conventional and Self-Ligating

Adhesion remains a key element in dentistry, whether approached in prosthetics, odontology, or orthodontics. It is a continuously researched aspect, as improved materials and adhesive methods keep emerging in the market. No orthodontic treatment can be effective without the proper adhesion strength...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vartolomei, Aurel-Claudiu, Ghiga, Dana-Valentina, Serbanoiu, Dan-Cosmin, Moldovan, Marioara, Cuc, Stanca, Pacurar, Mariana, Pollmann, Maria Cristina Figueiredo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9600873/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36286006
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj10100196
_version_ 1784816937221488640
author Vartolomei, Aurel-Claudiu
Ghiga, Dana-Valentina
Serbanoiu, Dan-Cosmin
Moldovan, Marioara
Cuc, Stanca
Pacurar, Mariana
Pollmann, Maria Cristina Figueiredo
author_facet Vartolomei, Aurel-Claudiu
Ghiga, Dana-Valentina
Serbanoiu, Dan-Cosmin
Moldovan, Marioara
Cuc, Stanca
Pacurar, Mariana
Pollmann, Maria Cristina Figueiredo
author_sort Vartolomei, Aurel-Claudiu
collection PubMed
description Adhesion remains a key element in dentistry, whether approached in prosthetics, odontology, or orthodontics. It is a continuously researched aspect, as improved materials and adhesive methods keep emerging in the market. No orthodontic treatment can be effective without the proper adhesion strength of the bonded elements on the teeth. The objective of this research, in the broad context of self-ligating versus conventional brackets, was to compare active and passive self-ligating systems with a conventional one by conducting an in vitro study on human-extracted premolars. Shear bond strength tests were executed by means of an advanced materials-testing machine that generated maximum load and tensile strength values. The data obtained underwent statistical analysis with a statistical threshold of p < 0.05. The results regarding the statistical significance were acquired when comparing the passive self-ligating system with the active self-ligating and conventional systems (load-at-maximum-load mean 204.9, SD 91.09, and p < 0.05). In this study, the passive self-ligating bracket system appears to present increased shear bond strength.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9600873
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96008732022-10-27 Comparative Evaluation of Two Bracket Systems’ Bond Strength: Conventional and Self-Ligating Vartolomei, Aurel-Claudiu Ghiga, Dana-Valentina Serbanoiu, Dan-Cosmin Moldovan, Marioara Cuc, Stanca Pacurar, Mariana Pollmann, Maria Cristina Figueiredo Dent J (Basel) Article Adhesion remains a key element in dentistry, whether approached in prosthetics, odontology, or orthodontics. It is a continuously researched aspect, as improved materials and adhesive methods keep emerging in the market. No orthodontic treatment can be effective without the proper adhesion strength of the bonded elements on the teeth. The objective of this research, in the broad context of self-ligating versus conventional brackets, was to compare active and passive self-ligating systems with a conventional one by conducting an in vitro study on human-extracted premolars. Shear bond strength tests were executed by means of an advanced materials-testing machine that generated maximum load and tensile strength values. The data obtained underwent statistical analysis with a statistical threshold of p < 0.05. The results regarding the statistical significance were acquired when comparing the passive self-ligating system with the active self-ligating and conventional systems (load-at-maximum-load mean 204.9, SD 91.09, and p < 0.05). In this study, the passive self-ligating bracket system appears to present increased shear bond strength. MDPI 2022-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9600873/ /pubmed/36286006 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj10100196 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Vartolomei, Aurel-Claudiu
Ghiga, Dana-Valentina
Serbanoiu, Dan-Cosmin
Moldovan, Marioara
Cuc, Stanca
Pacurar, Mariana
Pollmann, Maria Cristina Figueiredo
Comparative Evaluation of Two Bracket Systems’ Bond Strength: Conventional and Self-Ligating
title Comparative Evaluation of Two Bracket Systems’ Bond Strength: Conventional and Self-Ligating
title_full Comparative Evaluation of Two Bracket Systems’ Bond Strength: Conventional and Self-Ligating
title_fullStr Comparative Evaluation of Two Bracket Systems’ Bond Strength: Conventional and Self-Ligating
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Evaluation of Two Bracket Systems’ Bond Strength: Conventional and Self-Ligating
title_short Comparative Evaluation of Two Bracket Systems’ Bond Strength: Conventional and Self-Ligating
title_sort comparative evaluation of two bracket systems’ bond strength: conventional and self-ligating
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9600873/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36286006
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj10100196
work_keys_str_mv AT vartolomeiaurelclaudiu comparativeevaluationoftwobracketsystemsbondstrengthconventionalandselfligating
AT ghigadanavalentina comparativeevaluationoftwobracketsystemsbondstrengthconventionalandselfligating
AT serbanoiudancosmin comparativeevaluationoftwobracketsystemsbondstrengthconventionalandselfligating
AT moldovanmarioara comparativeevaluationoftwobracketsystemsbondstrengthconventionalandselfligating
AT cucstanca comparativeevaluationoftwobracketsystemsbondstrengthconventionalandselfligating
AT pacurarmariana comparativeevaluationoftwobracketsystemsbondstrengthconventionalandselfligating
AT pollmannmariacristinafigueiredo comparativeevaluationoftwobracketsystemsbondstrengthconventionalandselfligating