Cargando…

Technical Outcome, Clinical Success, and Complications of Low-Milliampere Computed Tomography Fluoroscopy-Guided Drainage of Lymphoceles Following Radical Prostatectomy with Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection

To evaluate the technical outcome, clinical success, and safety of low-milliampere CT fluoroscopy (CTF)-guided percutaneous drain (PD) placement in patients with lymphoceles following radical prostatectomy (RP) with pelvic lymph node dissection (LND). This retrospective analysis comprised 65 patient...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: D’Anastasi, Melvin, Ebenberger, Simone, Alghamdi, Abdulmajeed, Helck, Andreas, Herlemann, Annika, Stief, Christian, Khoder, Wael, Trumm, Christoph G., Stahl, Robert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9600916/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36292083
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12102394
_version_ 1784816948636286976
author D’Anastasi, Melvin
Ebenberger, Simone
Alghamdi, Abdulmajeed
Helck, Andreas
Herlemann, Annika
Stief, Christian
Khoder, Wael
Trumm, Christoph G.
Stahl, Robert
author_facet D’Anastasi, Melvin
Ebenberger, Simone
Alghamdi, Abdulmajeed
Helck, Andreas
Herlemann, Annika
Stief, Christian
Khoder, Wael
Trumm, Christoph G.
Stahl, Robert
author_sort D’Anastasi, Melvin
collection PubMed
description To evaluate the technical outcome, clinical success, and safety of low-milliampere CT fluoroscopy (CTF)-guided percutaneous drain (PD) placement in patients with lymphoceles following radical prostatectomy (RP) with pelvic lymph node dissection (LND). This retrospective analysis comprised 65 patients with PD placement in lymphoceles following RP under low-milliampere CTF guidance. Technical and clinical success were evaluated. Complications within a 30-day time interval associated with CTF-guided PD placement were classified according to SIR. Patient radiation exposure was quantified using dose-length products (DLP) of the pre-interventional planning CT scan (DLP(pre)), of the sum of intra-interventional CT fluoroscopic acquisitions (DLP(intra)) and of the post-interventional control CT scan (DLP(post)). Eighty-nine lymphoceles were detected. Seventy-seven CT-guided interventions were performed, with a total of 92 inserted drains. CTF-guided lymphocele drainage was technically successful in 100% of cases. For all symptomatic patients, improvement in symptoms was reported within 48 h after intervention. Time course of C-reactive protein and Leucocytes within 30 days revealed a statistically significant (p < 0.0001) decrease. Median DLP(pre), DLP(intra) and DLP(post) were 431 mGy*cm, 45 mGy*cm and 303 mGy*cm, respectively. Only one minor complication (self-resolving haematoma over the bladder dome; SIR Grade 2) was observed. Low-milliampere CTF-guided drainage is a safe treatment option in patients with lymphoceles following RP with pelvic LND characterized by high technical and good clinical success rates, which provides rapid symptom relief and serves as definite treatment or as a bridging therapy prior to laparoscopic marsupialisation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9600916
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96009162022-10-27 Technical Outcome, Clinical Success, and Complications of Low-Milliampere Computed Tomography Fluoroscopy-Guided Drainage of Lymphoceles Following Radical Prostatectomy with Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection D’Anastasi, Melvin Ebenberger, Simone Alghamdi, Abdulmajeed Helck, Andreas Herlemann, Annika Stief, Christian Khoder, Wael Trumm, Christoph G. Stahl, Robert Diagnostics (Basel) Article To evaluate the technical outcome, clinical success, and safety of low-milliampere CT fluoroscopy (CTF)-guided percutaneous drain (PD) placement in patients with lymphoceles following radical prostatectomy (RP) with pelvic lymph node dissection (LND). This retrospective analysis comprised 65 patients with PD placement in lymphoceles following RP under low-milliampere CTF guidance. Technical and clinical success were evaluated. Complications within a 30-day time interval associated with CTF-guided PD placement were classified according to SIR. Patient radiation exposure was quantified using dose-length products (DLP) of the pre-interventional planning CT scan (DLP(pre)), of the sum of intra-interventional CT fluoroscopic acquisitions (DLP(intra)) and of the post-interventional control CT scan (DLP(post)). Eighty-nine lymphoceles were detected. Seventy-seven CT-guided interventions were performed, with a total of 92 inserted drains. CTF-guided lymphocele drainage was technically successful in 100% of cases. For all symptomatic patients, improvement in symptoms was reported within 48 h after intervention. Time course of C-reactive protein and Leucocytes within 30 days revealed a statistically significant (p < 0.0001) decrease. Median DLP(pre), DLP(intra) and DLP(post) were 431 mGy*cm, 45 mGy*cm and 303 mGy*cm, respectively. Only one minor complication (self-resolving haematoma over the bladder dome; SIR Grade 2) was observed. Low-milliampere CTF-guided drainage is a safe treatment option in patients with lymphoceles following RP with pelvic LND characterized by high technical and good clinical success rates, which provides rapid symptom relief and serves as definite treatment or as a bridging therapy prior to laparoscopic marsupialisation. MDPI 2022-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9600916/ /pubmed/36292083 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12102394 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
D’Anastasi, Melvin
Ebenberger, Simone
Alghamdi, Abdulmajeed
Helck, Andreas
Herlemann, Annika
Stief, Christian
Khoder, Wael
Trumm, Christoph G.
Stahl, Robert
Technical Outcome, Clinical Success, and Complications of Low-Milliampere Computed Tomography Fluoroscopy-Guided Drainage of Lymphoceles Following Radical Prostatectomy with Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection
title Technical Outcome, Clinical Success, and Complications of Low-Milliampere Computed Tomography Fluoroscopy-Guided Drainage of Lymphoceles Following Radical Prostatectomy with Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection
title_full Technical Outcome, Clinical Success, and Complications of Low-Milliampere Computed Tomography Fluoroscopy-Guided Drainage of Lymphoceles Following Radical Prostatectomy with Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection
title_fullStr Technical Outcome, Clinical Success, and Complications of Low-Milliampere Computed Tomography Fluoroscopy-Guided Drainage of Lymphoceles Following Radical Prostatectomy with Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection
title_full_unstemmed Technical Outcome, Clinical Success, and Complications of Low-Milliampere Computed Tomography Fluoroscopy-Guided Drainage of Lymphoceles Following Radical Prostatectomy with Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection
title_short Technical Outcome, Clinical Success, and Complications of Low-Milliampere Computed Tomography Fluoroscopy-Guided Drainage of Lymphoceles Following Radical Prostatectomy with Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection
title_sort technical outcome, clinical success, and complications of low-milliampere computed tomography fluoroscopy-guided drainage of lymphoceles following radical prostatectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9600916/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36292083
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12102394
work_keys_str_mv AT danastasimelvin technicaloutcomeclinicalsuccessandcomplicationsoflowmilliamperecomputedtomographyfluoroscopyguideddrainageoflymphocelesfollowingradicalprostatectomywithpelviclymphnodedissection
AT ebenbergersimone technicaloutcomeclinicalsuccessandcomplicationsoflowmilliamperecomputedtomographyfluoroscopyguideddrainageoflymphocelesfollowingradicalprostatectomywithpelviclymphnodedissection
AT alghamdiabdulmajeed technicaloutcomeclinicalsuccessandcomplicationsoflowmilliamperecomputedtomographyfluoroscopyguideddrainageoflymphocelesfollowingradicalprostatectomywithpelviclymphnodedissection
AT helckandreas technicaloutcomeclinicalsuccessandcomplicationsoflowmilliamperecomputedtomographyfluoroscopyguideddrainageoflymphocelesfollowingradicalprostatectomywithpelviclymphnodedissection
AT herlemannannika technicaloutcomeclinicalsuccessandcomplicationsoflowmilliamperecomputedtomographyfluoroscopyguideddrainageoflymphocelesfollowingradicalprostatectomywithpelviclymphnodedissection
AT stiefchristian technicaloutcomeclinicalsuccessandcomplicationsoflowmilliamperecomputedtomographyfluoroscopyguideddrainageoflymphocelesfollowingradicalprostatectomywithpelviclymphnodedissection
AT khoderwael technicaloutcomeclinicalsuccessandcomplicationsoflowmilliamperecomputedtomographyfluoroscopyguideddrainageoflymphocelesfollowingradicalprostatectomywithpelviclymphnodedissection
AT trummchristophg technicaloutcomeclinicalsuccessandcomplicationsoflowmilliamperecomputedtomographyfluoroscopyguideddrainageoflymphocelesfollowingradicalprostatectomywithpelviclymphnodedissection
AT stahlrobert technicaloutcomeclinicalsuccessandcomplicationsoflowmilliamperecomputedtomographyfluoroscopyguideddrainageoflymphocelesfollowingradicalprostatectomywithpelviclymphnodedissection