Cargando…
Isolation and Quantification of Plasma Cell-Free DNA Using Different Manual and Automated Methods
Plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) originates from various tissues and cell types and can enable minimally invasive diagnosis, treatment and monitoring of cancer and other diseases. Proper extraction of cfDNA is critical to obtain optimal yields and purity. The goal of this study was to compare the perfor...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9601152/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36292239 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12102550 |
_version_ | 1784816986930282496 |
---|---|
author | Polatoglou, Eleni Mayer, Zsuzsanna Ungerer, Vida Bronkhorst, Abel J. Holdenrieder, Stefan |
author_facet | Polatoglou, Eleni Mayer, Zsuzsanna Ungerer, Vida Bronkhorst, Abel J. Holdenrieder, Stefan |
author_sort | Polatoglou, Eleni |
collection | PubMed |
description | Plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) originates from various tissues and cell types and can enable minimally invasive diagnosis, treatment and monitoring of cancer and other diseases. Proper extraction of cfDNA is critical to obtain optimal yields and purity. The goal of this study was to compare the performance of six commercial cfDNA kits to extract pure, high-quality cfDNA from human plasma samples and evaluate the quantity and size profiles of cfDNA extracts—among them, two spin-column based, three magnetic bead-based and two automatic magnetic bead-based methods. Significant differences were observed in the yield of DNA among the different extraction kits (up to 4.3 times), as measured by the Qubit Fluorometer and Bioanalyzer. All kits isolated mostly small fragments corresponding to mono-nucleosomal sizes. The highest yield and reproducibility were obtained by the manual QIAamp Circulating Nucleic Acid Kit and automated MagNA Pure Total NA Isolation Kit. The results highlight the importance of standardizing preanalytical conditions depending on the requirements of the downstream applications. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9601152 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96011522022-10-27 Isolation and Quantification of Plasma Cell-Free DNA Using Different Manual and Automated Methods Polatoglou, Eleni Mayer, Zsuzsanna Ungerer, Vida Bronkhorst, Abel J. Holdenrieder, Stefan Diagnostics (Basel) Communication Plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) originates from various tissues and cell types and can enable minimally invasive diagnosis, treatment and monitoring of cancer and other diseases. Proper extraction of cfDNA is critical to obtain optimal yields and purity. The goal of this study was to compare the performance of six commercial cfDNA kits to extract pure, high-quality cfDNA from human plasma samples and evaluate the quantity and size profiles of cfDNA extracts—among them, two spin-column based, three magnetic bead-based and two automatic magnetic bead-based methods. Significant differences were observed in the yield of DNA among the different extraction kits (up to 4.3 times), as measured by the Qubit Fluorometer and Bioanalyzer. All kits isolated mostly small fragments corresponding to mono-nucleosomal sizes. The highest yield and reproducibility were obtained by the manual QIAamp Circulating Nucleic Acid Kit and automated MagNA Pure Total NA Isolation Kit. The results highlight the importance of standardizing preanalytical conditions depending on the requirements of the downstream applications. MDPI 2022-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9601152/ /pubmed/36292239 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12102550 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Communication Polatoglou, Eleni Mayer, Zsuzsanna Ungerer, Vida Bronkhorst, Abel J. Holdenrieder, Stefan Isolation and Quantification of Plasma Cell-Free DNA Using Different Manual and Automated Methods |
title | Isolation and Quantification of Plasma Cell-Free DNA Using Different Manual and Automated Methods |
title_full | Isolation and Quantification of Plasma Cell-Free DNA Using Different Manual and Automated Methods |
title_fullStr | Isolation and Quantification of Plasma Cell-Free DNA Using Different Manual and Automated Methods |
title_full_unstemmed | Isolation and Quantification of Plasma Cell-Free DNA Using Different Manual and Automated Methods |
title_short | Isolation and Quantification of Plasma Cell-Free DNA Using Different Manual and Automated Methods |
title_sort | isolation and quantification of plasma cell-free dna using different manual and automated methods |
topic | Communication |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9601152/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36292239 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12102550 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT polatogloueleni isolationandquantificationofplasmacellfreednausingdifferentmanualandautomatedmethods AT mayerzsuzsanna isolationandquantificationofplasmacellfreednausingdifferentmanualandautomatedmethods AT ungerervida isolationandquantificationofplasmacellfreednausingdifferentmanualandautomatedmethods AT bronkhorstabelj isolationandquantificationofplasmacellfreednausingdifferentmanualandautomatedmethods AT holdenriederstefan isolationandquantificationofplasmacellfreednausingdifferentmanualandautomatedmethods |