Cargando…

Isolation and Quantification of Plasma Cell-Free DNA Using Different Manual and Automated Methods

Plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) originates from various tissues and cell types and can enable minimally invasive diagnosis, treatment and monitoring of cancer and other diseases. Proper extraction of cfDNA is critical to obtain optimal yields and purity. The goal of this study was to compare the perfor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Polatoglou, Eleni, Mayer, Zsuzsanna, Ungerer, Vida, Bronkhorst, Abel J., Holdenrieder, Stefan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9601152/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36292239
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12102550
_version_ 1784816986930282496
author Polatoglou, Eleni
Mayer, Zsuzsanna
Ungerer, Vida
Bronkhorst, Abel J.
Holdenrieder, Stefan
author_facet Polatoglou, Eleni
Mayer, Zsuzsanna
Ungerer, Vida
Bronkhorst, Abel J.
Holdenrieder, Stefan
author_sort Polatoglou, Eleni
collection PubMed
description Plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) originates from various tissues and cell types and can enable minimally invasive diagnosis, treatment and monitoring of cancer and other diseases. Proper extraction of cfDNA is critical to obtain optimal yields and purity. The goal of this study was to compare the performance of six commercial cfDNA kits to extract pure, high-quality cfDNA from human plasma samples and evaluate the quantity and size profiles of cfDNA extracts—among them, two spin-column based, three magnetic bead-based and two automatic magnetic bead-based methods. Significant differences were observed in the yield of DNA among the different extraction kits (up to 4.3 times), as measured by the Qubit Fluorometer and Bioanalyzer. All kits isolated mostly small fragments corresponding to mono-nucleosomal sizes. The highest yield and reproducibility were obtained by the manual QIAamp Circulating Nucleic Acid Kit and automated MagNA Pure Total NA Isolation Kit. The results highlight the importance of standardizing preanalytical conditions depending on the requirements of the downstream applications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9601152
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96011522022-10-27 Isolation and Quantification of Plasma Cell-Free DNA Using Different Manual and Automated Methods Polatoglou, Eleni Mayer, Zsuzsanna Ungerer, Vida Bronkhorst, Abel J. Holdenrieder, Stefan Diagnostics (Basel) Communication Plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) originates from various tissues and cell types and can enable minimally invasive diagnosis, treatment and monitoring of cancer and other diseases. Proper extraction of cfDNA is critical to obtain optimal yields and purity. The goal of this study was to compare the performance of six commercial cfDNA kits to extract pure, high-quality cfDNA from human plasma samples and evaluate the quantity and size profiles of cfDNA extracts—among them, two spin-column based, three magnetic bead-based and two automatic magnetic bead-based methods. Significant differences were observed in the yield of DNA among the different extraction kits (up to 4.3 times), as measured by the Qubit Fluorometer and Bioanalyzer. All kits isolated mostly small fragments corresponding to mono-nucleosomal sizes. The highest yield and reproducibility were obtained by the manual QIAamp Circulating Nucleic Acid Kit and automated MagNA Pure Total NA Isolation Kit. The results highlight the importance of standardizing preanalytical conditions depending on the requirements of the downstream applications. MDPI 2022-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9601152/ /pubmed/36292239 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12102550 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Communication
Polatoglou, Eleni
Mayer, Zsuzsanna
Ungerer, Vida
Bronkhorst, Abel J.
Holdenrieder, Stefan
Isolation and Quantification of Plasma Cell-Free DNA Using Different Manual and Automated Methods
title Isolation and Quantification of Plasma Cell-Free DNA Using Different Manual and Automated Methods
title_full Isolation and Quantification of Plasma Cell-Free DNA Using Different Manual and Automated Methods
title_fullStr Isolation and Quantification of Plasma Cell-Free DNA Using Different Manual and Automated Methods
title_full_unstemmed Isolation and Quantification of Plasma Cell-Free DNA Using Different Manual and Automated Methods
title_short Isolation and Quantification of Plasma Cell-Free DNA Using Different Manual and Automated Methods
title_sort isolation and quantification of plasma cell-free dna using different manual and automated methods
topic Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9601152/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36292239
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12102550
work_keys_str_mv AT polatogloueleni isolationandquantificationofplasmacellfreednausingdifferentmanualandautomatedmethods
AT mayerzsuzsanna isolationandquantificationofplasmacellfreednausingdifferentmanualandautomatedmethods
AT ungerervida isolationandquantificationofplasmacellfreednausingdifferentmanualandautomatedmethods
AT bronkhorstabelj isolationandquantificationofplasmacellfreednausingdifferentmanualandautomatedmethods
AT holdenriederstefan isolationandquantificationofplasmacellfreednausingdifferentmanualandautomatedmethods