Cargando…
The Value of Deep Learning Image Reconstruction in Improving the Quality of Low-Dose Chest CT Images
This study aimed to evaluate the value of the deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) algorithm (GE Healthcare’s TrueFidelity™) in improving the image quality of low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) of the chest. First, we retrospectively extracted raw data of chest LDCT from 50 patients and recons...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9601258/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36292249 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12102560 |
_version_ | 1784817015676993536 |
---|---|
author | Jiang, Jiu-Ming Miao, Lei Liang, Xin Liu, Zhuo-Heng Zhang, Li Li, Meng |
author_facet | Jiang, Jiu-Ming Miao, Lei Liang, Xin Liu, Zhuo-Heng Zhang, Li Li, Meng |
author_sort | Jiang, Jiu-Ming |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study aimed to evaluate the value of the deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) algorithm (GE Healthcare’s TrueFidelity™) in improving the image quality of low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) of the chest. First, we retrospectively extracted raw data of chest LDCT from 50 patients and reconstructed them by using model-based adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-Veo at 50% (ASIR-V 50%) and DLIR at medium and high strengths (DLIR-M and DLIR-H). Three sets of images were obtained. Next, two radiographers measured the mean CT value/image signal and standard deviation (SD) in Hounsfield units at the region of interest (ROI) and calculated the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). Two radiologists subjectively evaluated the image quality using a 5-point Likert scale. The differences between the groups of data were analyzed through a repeated measures ANOVA or the Friedman test. Last, our result show that the three reconstructions did not differ significantly in signal (p > 0.05) but had significant differences in noise, SNR, and CNR (p < 0.001). The subjective scores significantly differed among the three reconstruction modalities in soft tissue (p < 0.001) but not in lung tissue (p > 0.05). DLIR-H had the best noise reduction ability and improved SNR and CNR without distorting the image texture, followed by DLIR-M and ASIR-V 50%. In summary, DLIR can provide a higher image quality at the same dose, enhancing the physicians’ diagnostic confidence and improving the diagnostic efficacy of LDCT for lung cancer screening. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9601258 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96012582022-10-27 The Value of Deep Learning Image Reconstruction in Improving the Quality of Low-Dose Chest CT Images Jiang, Jiu-Ming Miao, Lei Liang, Xin Liu, Zhuo-Heng Zhang, Li Li, Meng Diagnostics (Basel) Article This study aimed to evaluate the value of the deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) algorithm (GE Healthcare’s TrueFidelity™) in improving the image quality of low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) of the chest. First, we retrospectively extracted raw data of chest LDCT from 50 patients and reconstructed them by using model-based adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-Veo at 50% (ASIR-V 50%) and DLIR at medium and high strengths (DLIR-M and DLIR-H). Three sets of images were obtained. Next, two radiographers measured the mean CT value/image signal and standard deviation (SD) in Hounsfield units at the region of interest (ROI) and calculated the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). Two radiologists subjectively evaluated the image quality using a 5-point Likert scale. The differences between the groups of data were analyzed through a repeated measures ANOVA or the Friedman test. Last, our result show that the three reconstructions did not differ significantly in signal (p > 0.05) but had significant differences in noise, SNR, and CNR (p < 0.001). The subjective scores significantly differed among the three reconstruction modalities in soft tissue (p < 0.001) but not in lung tissue (p > 0.05). DLIR-H had the best noise reduction ability and improved SNR and CNR without distorting the image texture, followed by DLIR-M and ASIR-V 50%. In summary, DLIR can provide a higher image quality at the same dose, enhancing the physicians’ diagnostic confidence and improving the diagnostic efficacy of LDCT for lung cancer screening. MDPI 2022-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9601258/ /pubmed/36292249 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12102560 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Jiang, Jiu-Ming Miao, Lei Liang, Xin Liu, Zhuo-Heng Zhang, Li Li, Meng The Value of Deep Learning Image Reconstruction in Improving the Quality of Low-Dose Chest CT Images |
title | The Value of Deep Learning Image Reconstruction in Improving the Quality of Low-Dose Chest CT Images |
title_full | The Value of Deep Learning Image Reconstruction in Improving the Quality of Low-Dose Chest CT Images |
title_fullStr | The Value of Deep Learning Image Reconstruction in Improving the Quality of Low-Dose Chest CT Images |
title_full_unstemmed | The Value of Deep Learning Image Reconstruction in Improving the Quality of Low-Dose Chest CT Images |
title_short | The Value of Deep Learning Image Reconstruction in Improving the Quality of Low-Dose Chest CT Images |
title_sort | value of deep learning image reconstruction in improving the quality of low-dose chest ct images |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9601258/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36292249 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12102560 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jiangjiuming thevalueofdeeplearningimagereconstructioninimprovingthequalityoflowdosechestctimages AT miaolei thevalueofdeeplearningimagereconstructioninimprovingthequalityoflowdosechestctimages AT liangxin thevalueofdeeplearningimagereconstructioninimprovingthequalityoflowdosechestctimages AT liuzhuoheng thevalueofdeeplearningimagereconstructioninimprovingthequalityoflowdosechestctimages AT zhangli thevalueofdeeplearningimagereconstructioninimprovingthequalityoflowdosechestctimages AT limeng thevalueofdeeplearningimagereconstructioninimprovingthequalityoflowdosechestctimages AT jiangjiuming valueofdeeplearningimagereconstructioninimprovingthequalityoflowdosechestctimages AT miaolei valueofdeeplearningimagereconstructioninimprovingthequalityoflowdosechestctimages AT liangxin valueofdeeplearningimagereconstructioninimprovingthequalityoflowdosechestctimages AT liuzhuoheng valueofdeeplearningimagereconstructioninimprovingthequalityoflowdosechestctimages AT zhangli valueofdeeplearningimagereconstructioninimprovingthequalityoflowdosechestctimages AT limeng valueofdeeplearningimagereconstructioninimprovingthequalityoflowdosechestctimages |