Cargando…

The Value of Deep Learning Image Reconstruction in Improving the Quality of Low-Dose Chest CT Images

This study aimed to evaluate the value of the deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) algorithm (GE Healthcare’s TrueFidelity™) in improving the image quality of low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) of the chest. First, we retrospectively extracted raw data of chest LDCT from 50 patients and recons...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jiang, Jiu-Ming, Miao, Lei, Liang, Xin, Liu, Zhuo-Heng, Zhang, Li, Li, Meng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9601258/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36292249
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12102560
_version_ 1784817015676993536
author Jiang, Jiu-Ming
Miao, Lei
Liang, Xin
Liu, Zhuo-Heng
Zhang, Li
Li, Meng
author_facet Jiang, Jiu-Ming
Miao, Lei
Liang, Xin
Liu, Zhuo-Heng
Zhang, Li
Li, Meng
author_sort Jiang, Jiu-Ming
collection PubMed
description This study aimed to evaluate the value of the deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) algorithm (GE Healthcare’s TrueFidelity™) in improving the image quality of low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) of the chest. First, we retrospectively extracted raw data of chest LDCT from 50 patients and reconstructed them by using model-based adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-Veo at 50% (ASIR-V 50%) and DLIR at medium and high strengths (DLIR-M and DLIR-H). Three sets of images were obtained. Next, two radiographers measured the mean CT value/image signal and standard deviation (SD) in Hounsfield units at the region of interest (ROI) and calculated the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). Two radiologists subjectively evaluated the image quality using a 5-point Likert scale. The differences between the groups of data were analyzed through a repeated measures ANOVA or the Friedman test. Last, our result show that the three reconstructions did not differ significantly in signal (p > 0.05) but had significant differences in noise, SNR, and CNR (p < 0.001). The subjective scores significantly differed among the three reconstruction modalities in soft tissue (p < 0.001) but not in lung tissue (p > 0.05). DLIR-H had the best noise reduction ability and improved SNR and CNR without distorting the image texture, followed by DLIR-M and ASIR-V 50%. In summary, DLIR can provide a higher image quality at the same dose, enhancing the physicians’ diagnostic confidence and improving the diagnostic efficacy of LDCT for lung cancer screening.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9601258
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96012582022-10-27 The Value of Deep Learning Image Reconstruction in Improving the Quality of Low-Dose Chest CT Images Jiang, Jiu-Ming Miao, Lei Liang, Xin Liu, Zhuo-Heng Zhang, Li Li, Meng Diagnostics (Basel) Article This study aimed to evaluate the value of the deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) algorithm (GE Healthcare’s TrueFidelity™) in improving the image quality of low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) of the chest. First, we retrospectively extracted raw data of chest LDCT from 50 patients and reconstructed them by using model-based adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-Veo at 50% (ASIR-V 50%) and DLIR at medium and high strengths (DLIR-M and DLIR-H). Three sets of images were obtained. Next, two radiographers measured the mean CT value/image signal and standard deviation (SD) in Hounsfield units at the region of interest (ROI) and calculated the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). Two radiologists subjectively evaluated the image quality using a 5-point Likert scale. The differences between the groups of data were analyzed through a repeated measures ANOVA or the Friedman test. Last, our result show that the three reconstructions did not differ significantly in signal (p > 0.05) but had significant differences in noise, SNR, and CNR (p < 0.001). The subjective scores significantly differed among the three reconstruction modalities in soft tissue (p < 0.001) but not in lung tissue (p > 0.05). DLIR-H had the best noise reduction ability and improved SNR and CNR without distorting the image texture, followed by DLIR-M and ASIR-V 50%. In summary, DLIR can provide a higher image quality at the same dose, enhancing the physicians’ diagnostic confidence and improving the diagnostic efficacy of LDCT for lung cancer screening. MDPI 2022-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9601258/ /pubmed/36292249 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12102560 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Jiang, Jiu-Ming
Miao, Lei
Liang, Xin
Liu, Zhuo-Heng
Zhang, Li
Li, Meng
The Value of Deep Learning Image Reconstruction in Improving the Quality of Low-Dose Chest CT Images
title The Value of Deep Learning Image Reconstruction in Improving the Quality of Low-Dose Chest CT Images
title_full The Value of Deep Learning Image Reconstruction in Improving the Quality of Low-Dose Chest CT Images
title_fullStr The Value of Deep Learning Image Reconstruction in Improving the Quality of Low-Dose Chest CT Images
title_full_unstemmed The Value of Deep Learning Image Reconstruction in Improving the Quality of Low-Dose Chest CT Images
title_short The Value of Deep Learning Image Reconstruction in Improving the Quality of Low-Dose Chest CT Images
title_sort value of deep learning image reconstruction in improving the quality of low-dose chest ct images
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9601258/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36292249
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12102560
work_keys_str_mv AT jiangjiuming thevalueofdeeplearningimagereconstructioninimprovingthequalityoflowdosechestctimages
AT miaolei thevalueofdeeplearningimagereconstructioninimprovingthequalityoflowdosechestctimages
AT liangxin thevalueofdeeplearningimagereconstructioninimprovingthequalityoflowdosechestctimages
AT liuzhuoheng thevalueofdeeplearningimagereconstructioninimprovingthequalityoflowdosechestctimages
AT zhangli thevalueofdeeplearningimagereconstructioninimprovingthequalityoflowdosechestctimages
AT limeng thevalueofdeeplearningimagereconstructioninimprovingthequalityoflowdosechestctimages
AT jiangjiuming valueofdeeplearningimagereconstructioninimprovingthequalityoflowdosechestctimages
AT miaolei valueofdeeplearningimagereconstructioninimprovingthequalityoflowdosechestctimages
AT liangxin valueofdeeplearningimagereconstructioninimprovingthequalityoflowdosechestctimages
AT liuzhuoheng valueofdeeplearningimagereconstructioninimprovingthequalityoflowdosechestctimages
AT zhangli valueofdeeplearningimagereconstructioninimprovingthequalityoflowdosechestctimages
AT limeng valueofdeeplearningimagereconstructioninimprovingthequalityoflowdosechestctimages